1887
Language Testing Colloquium
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.11.2.07dej
1988-01-01
2024-09-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ACTFL
    ACTFL (1982) ACTFLProvisional Proficiency Guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ACTFL
    ACTFL (1986) ACTFLProficiency Guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alderson, J.C.
    (1978) A Study of the cloze procedure with native and non-native speakers of English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachman, L.F.
    (1987) Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. In A. Valdman (ed.) Proceedings of the Symposium on the Evaluation of Foreign Language Proficiency. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University, CREDLI: 29–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachman, L.F. and S.J. Savignon
    (1986) The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: a critique of the ACTFL oral interview. Modern Language Journal70: 380–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05294.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05294.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, M.L.
    (1983) Hierarchical structure of comprehension skills, volume2. Hawthorn, Victoria, ACER.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. de Jong, J.H.A.L. and C.A.W. Glas
    (1987) Validation of listening comprehension tests using Item Response Theory. Language Testing4,2: 170–194. doi: 10.1177/026553228700400204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400204 [Google Scholar]
  8. Groot, P.J.M.
    (1975) Testing communicative competence in listening comprehension. In R.L. Jones and B. Spolsky (eds) Testing language proficiency. Washington, DC, Center for Applied Linguistics: 45–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McClelland, J.L. , D.E. Rumelhart et al.
    (1986) Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Page, B. and D. Hewett
    (1987) Languages step by step: graded objectives in the U.K. London, Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Powers, D.E.
    (1986) Academic demands related to listening skills. Language Testing3,1: 1–38. doi: 10.1177/026553228600300101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300101 [Google Scholar]
  12. Savignon, S.J.
    (1985) Evaluation of communicative competence: the ACTFL Provisional Proficiency Guidelines. Modern Language Journal69,2: 129–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1985.tb01928.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1985.tb01928.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Spolsky, B.
    (1985) What does it mean to know how to use a language? An essay on the theoretical basis of language testing. Language Testing2,2: 180–191. doi: 10.1177/026553228500200206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200206 [Google Scholar]
  14. Thurstone, L.L.
    (1959) The measurement of values. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. van Dijk, T.
    (ed.) (1985) Handbook of discourse analysis. London, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. van Dijk, T. and W. Kintsch
    (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. van Ek, J.
    (1975) The Threshold Level. Strasbourg, Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Winograd, T.A.
    (1980) What does it mean to understand language?Cognitive Science4,3: 209–241. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0403_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0403_1 [Google Scholar]
  19. (1983) Language as a cognitive process. Reading, MA: Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.11.2.07dej
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error