Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This brief article critically examines the assumptions and shortcomings of lexico-syntactically based measures of readability, using the popular Fry’s readability scale as its prime example. Thereafter, it explores an alternative semantic approach to the issue by re-focusing upon three crucial cohesive factors in the development of textual meaning that Fry’s formula ignores, to its cost.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Butler, C.S.
    (1985) Systemic linguistics. London, Batsford.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Forsyth, F.
    (1971) The day of the jackal. London, Corgi Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fry, E.B.
    (1968) A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading11, 7: 513–516 & 575–578.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1977) Fry’s readability graph: clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading21, 6: 242–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardner, P.L.
    (1981) Students’ difficulties with logical connectives in science. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics4, 2: 50–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Halliday, M.A.K.
    (1988) An introduction to functional grammar. London, Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London, Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harrison, C.
    (1980) Readability in the classroom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Keller, H.
    (1971) Closer towards a theory of music. The Listener85, 6: 218–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Joyce, J.
    (1928) Anna Livia Plurabelle. In H. Levin (ed.) (1966) The portable James Joyce. New York, Viking Press: 721–744.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosen, H.
    (1967) The language of textbooks. In J.N. Britton (ed.) Talking and writing. London, Methuen: 100–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Syme, R.
    (1939) The Roman revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Weaver, N.
    (1980) Picture to the editor. Afterimage7, 9: 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error