1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 13, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The author argues that the differences in the ways of speaking prevailing in different societies and different communities are profound and systematic, and reflect the different cultural values. In the past, the extent of the differences between different language communities in their ways of speaking was often underestimated. In particular, the search for universals in language use inspired by language philosophers such as Paul Grice (1975, 1981) and John Searle (1969, 1979) often led to the identification of the mainstream American English with the “normal human ways of speaking”. The last decade has witnessed a growing reaction against this kind of misguided universalism,resulting in the birth of a new discipline: cross-cultural pragmatics. The progress of this new discipline, however, has been hampered by the lack of a suitable metalanguage. Researchers in this field tend to rely heavily on vague and undefined terms such as “directness”, “indirectness”, “harmony”, “solidarity”, which are used differently by different authors, or by the same authors but on different occasions. This leads to confusion, and to a lack of consensus and clarity even on the most basic points. The author argues that to compare cultures in a truly illuminating way we need a culture-independent perspective, and that one can reach such a perspective by relying on a natural semantic metalanguage, based on universal semantic primitives. These claims are illustrated in the paper with numerous examples.

© 1990 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.13.1.03wie
1990-01-01
2023-09-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.13.1.03wie
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahams, R.
    (1976) Talking Black. Rowley, MA.Newbury House.
  2. Ameka, F.
    (1987) A comparative analysis of conversational routines in two languages: English and Ewe. Journal of Pragmatics11.3299–326 doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90135‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90135-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnlund, D.
    (1975) Communicative styles in two cultures: Japan and the United States. In Kendon and Key 1975 427–456
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, E.
    (1976) Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York, Academic Press.
  5. Bauman, R. and J. Sherzer
    (eds.) (1974) Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  6. Benedict, R.
    (1947) The chrysanthemum and the sword. London, Seeker and Warburg
  7. Blum-Kulka, S. , B. Danet and R. Gherson
    (1985) The language of requesting in Israeli society. In Forgas 1985: 113–139 doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑5074‑6_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5074-6_7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, P. and S. Levinson
    (1978) Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In Goody 1978: 56–310
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chisholm, W.S.
    (1984) Interrogativity: a colloquium on the grammar, typology and pragmatics of questions in seven diverse languages. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.4
  10. Cole, P. and J. Morgan
    (eds.) (1975) Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York, Academic Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Comrie, B.
    (1984) Russian. In Chisholm 1984: 7–46 doi: 10.1075/tsl.4.03com
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.4.03com [Google Scholar]
  12. Coulmas, F.
    (1981a) Poison to your soul: thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In Coulmas 1981b: 69–91
     [Google Scholar]
  13. (1981b) Conversational routine. The Hague, Mouton.
  14. Eades, D.
    (1982) You gotta know how to talk....: information seeking in South-East Queensland Aboriginal Society. Australian Journal of Linguistics2.1: 61–82 doi: 10.1080/07268608208599282
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608208599282 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fishman, J.
    (ed.) (1968) Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague, Mouton doi: 10.1515/9783110805376
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805376
  16. Forgas, J.P.
    (ed.) (1985) Language and social situations. New York, Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑5074‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5074-6
  17. Geertz, C.
    (1976) The religion of Java. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  18. Gladwin, T. and W. Sturtevant
    (eds.) (1962) Anthropology and human behaviour. Washington DC, Anthropological Society of Washington.
  19. Goddard, C.
    (1985) A grammar of Yankunvtjatjara. Alice Springs, Institute for Aboriginal Development.
  20. Goody, E.
    (ed.) (1978) Questions and politeness. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  21. Grice, H.P.
    (1975) Logic and Conversaiton. In Cole and Morgan 1975: 41–58
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (1981) Presupposition and conversational implicature. In Cole 1981: 183–198
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Harkins, J.
    (1988) English as a ‘two-way’ language in Alice Springs. M.A. thesis, Australian National University.
  24. Hijirida, K. and H. Sohn
    (1986) Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistic sensitivity to honorific variables: evidence from English, Japanese, and Korean. Papers in Linguistics. 19.3: 365–401. doi: 10.1080/08351818609389264
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818609389264 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hollos, M. and W. Beeman
    (1974) The development of directives among Norwegian and Hungarian children: an example of communicative style in culture. Language in Society. 7: 345–355. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500005765
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005765 [Google Scholar]
  26. Honna, N. and B. Hoffer
    (1989) An English Dictionary of Japanese ways of thinking. Tokyo, Yuhikaku.
  27. Hymes, D.H.
    (1962) The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin and Sturtevant 1962: 15–53. Reprinted in Fishman 1968: 99–138
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson, K.
    (1972) The vocabulary of race. In Kochman 1972: 140–151.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kageyama, T. and I. Tamori
    (1976) Japanese whimperatives. Papers inJapanese Linguistics4: 13–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Katriel, T.
    (1986) Talking straight: dugri speech in Israeli Sabra Culture. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  31. Kendon, A. , R. Harris , and M. Key
    (eds.) 1975 Organisation of behaviour in face-to-face interaction. The Hague, Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110907643
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907643
  32. Kochman, T.
    (1972a) Toward an ethnography of black American speech behaviour. In Kochman 1972b: 241–264
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (ed.) (1972b) Rappin’ and styling’ out. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
  34. (1981) Black and white styles in conflict. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  35. Lanham, B.B.
    (1986) Ethnics and moral precepts taught in schools of Japan and the United States. In Lebra and Lebra 1986: 280–296.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lebra, T.S.
    (1976) Japanese patterns of behaviour. Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii.
  37. Lebra, T.S. and P. William
    (eds.) (1986) Japanese culture and behaviour: selected readings. (Rev. ed.) Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii.
  38. Leech, G.
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London, Longman.
  39. Matsumoto, Y.
    (1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics12 doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90003‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mizutani, O. and N. Mizutani
    (1987) How to be polite in Japanese. Tokyo, Japan Times.
  41. Ochs Keenan, E.
    (1976) The universality of conversational postulates. Language in Society5: 67–80. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006850
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006850 [Google Scholar]
  42. Reisman, K.
    (1974) Contrapuntal conversations in an Antiguan villiage. In Bauman and Sherzer 1974: 110–143.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Schriffrin, D.
    (1984) Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society13: 311–355 doi: 10.1017/S0047404500010526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010526 [Google Scholar]
  44. Searle, J.
    (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  45. (1979) Expression and meaning: studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213
  46. Smith, H.
    (1976) The Russians. London, Sphere Books.
  47. Smith, R.
    (1983) Japanese society: tradition, self, and the social order. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  48. Sohn, H.
    (1983) Intercultural communication in cognitive values: Americans and Koreans. Language and Linguistics (Seoul)9: 93–136.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Suzuki, T.
    (1986) Language and behaviour in Japan: the conceptualisation of personal relations. In Lebra and Lebra 1986: 142–157.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Tannen, D.
    (1981a) Ethnicity as conversational style. Discourse Processes4.3: 221–238. doi: 10.1080/01638538109544517
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538109544517 [Google Scholar]
  51. (1981b) New York Jewish conversational style. International Journal of the Sociology of Language30: 133–149.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. (1986) That’s not what I meant! How conversational style makes or breaks relationships. New York, Ballantine.
  53. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1985) Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics9. 145–178. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90023‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2 [Google Scholar]
  54. In Press. Semantics, culture and cognition. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.13.1.03wie
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error