1887
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between teachers’ theories of language and learning and the nature of classroom discourse. Through analysis of data collected from two year 3 classes, it is argued that there are three components functioning simultaneously in all lessons. These are the interpersonal, the content and the metalanguage components. The focus of the paper is on how the content and the metalanguage components are realized in the classroom discourse, and on the educational implications of the metalanguage component in particular. It is suggested that the quality of the metalanguage component has an impact on the overall quality of the language education program and that this impact derives from an appropriate theory of language use.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.14.2.01ham
1991-01-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Christie, F.
    (1989) Curriculum genres in early childhood education: A case study in writing development. Unpublished PhD thesis. Linguistics Department, University of Sydney.
  2. Halliday, M.A.K.
    (1985) Spoken and written language. Geelong, Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1989) Towards a language based theory of learning. Paper presented tothe ‘Language and Learning’ conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Halliday, M.A.K and R. Hasan
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London, Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hammond, J.
    (1990) Is Learning to read and write the same as learning to speak? In F. Christie (ed.) Literacy for a changing world. Melbourne, A.C.E.R. Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lemke, J. L.
    (1985) Using language in the classroom. Geelong, Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Martin, J. R.
    (1987) Classification and framing: double dealing in pedagogic discourse. Paper presented atthe Post-World Congress Symposium ‘Language in Learning’, Brisbane 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Martin, J.R. , P. Wignell , S. Eggins and J. Rothery
    (1988) Secret English: discourse technology in a junior secondary school. In L. Gerot and T.van Leeuwen (eds) Language and socialisation: home and school. Sydney, School of English and Linguistics, Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sinclair, J. and R.M. Coulthard
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Stubbs, M.
    (1983) Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.14.2.01ham
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error