1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study uses the methodology of conversational analysis to examine a case of ‘troubles talk’ between a group of female survivors of rape:that is, conversation on the discourse topic of ‘troubles’ or problems, and displaying the close interactional distance of intimacy. Rather than dwelling on the sequential and functional framework of ‘troubles talk’, this paper analyses the conversational process of ‘affiliation’ between the interactants as it occurs within the structure of the conversation, and the linguistic and paralinguistic devices utilised successfully in the achievement of ‘affiliation’ in the ‘troubles talk’. Both topical and interactional levels are considered, as they interact in the conversation to achieve successful ‘affiliation’ and ‘affiliation response’. The successful utilisation of linguistic and paralinguistic devices in affiliation affect the consequent self-disclosure which is crucial in overcoming the trauma of the experiences discussed in the ‘troubles talk’. The significance of affiliation to social context, gender, and culture are also considered.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.16.1.04pri
1993-01-01
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Caraveli, A.
    (1986) The bitter wounding:The lament as social protest in rural Greece. In J. Dubisch (ed.)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dubisch, J.
    (ed.) (1986) Gender and power in rural Greece. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Du Bois, J. , S. Cumming , and S. Schuetze-Coburn
    (1988) Discourse transcription. In S.A. Thompson (ed.).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner, R.J.
    (1991) The issue of natural data collection. Paper presented tothe Applied Linguistics Association of Australia Annual Conference, Townsville, October 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jefferson, G.
    (1988) On the sequential organisation of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems35,4:418–441. doi: 10.2307/800595
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800595 [Google Scholar]
  6. Liddicoat, A. J.
    (1989) The turn-taking system in multi-interviewee news interviews. Melbourne Papers in Applied Linguistics1,2:1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. London Rape Crisis Centre
    London Rape Crisis Centre (1984) Sexual violence: The reality for women. London, Women’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sydney Rape Crisis Collective
    Sydney Rape Crisis Collective (1984) Surviving rape. Sydney, Fontana/Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tannen, D.
    (1990) You just don’t understand: Men and women in conversation. New York, William Morrow.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson, S.A.
    (1988) Discourse and grammar. (Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol.2) University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.16.1.04pri
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error