Volume 42, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Thirty years ago Australian researchers led the development of language and content integration in schools, advocating systematic teaching of language across the curriculum to meet the needs of English as an additional language (EAL) students. However, despite significant improvements in initial teacher education, targeted professional development and language-specific curriculum and assessment, this paper suggests that secondary teachers have gained only a superficial understanding of the language knowledge necessary to teach EAL students. Drawing on questionnaires, interviews, and observations, this case study of two secondary schools in Sydney reveals the majority of teachers report their perspectives and experiences of good teaching have equipped them with a repertoire of sufficient strategies to meet EAL needs, and they see little difference between teaching EAL and learners with low levels of literacy. This paper concludes a renewed focus on integrating language and content teaching and partnership models of professional learning and evaluation are needed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) [Google Scholar]
  2. Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA)
    Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012) The shape of the Australian curriculum (Version 4), https://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/The_Shape_of_the_Aus​tralian_Curriculum_v4.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunch, G. C.
    (2013) Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37, 298–341. doi:  10.3102/0091732X12461772
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772 [Google Scholar]
  4. Christie, F., & Derewianka, B.
    (2010) School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Hong Kong: A&C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummins, J., & Early, M.
    (Eds.) (2011) Identity texts: The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davison, C.
    (1988) The role of language in the post-primary classroom. InDavison, C. (Ed.), “But this isn’t science, Miss”: The Language across the Curriculum Project in Victoria (pp.16–26). Victoria, Australia: Ministry of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1993) Integrating ESL into the mainstream: Australian perspectives. Multicultural Teaching, 11(3), 35–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2006) Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 9(4), 454–475. doi:  10.2167/beb339.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb339.0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davison, C., & Williams, A.
    (2001) Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. InB. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp.51–70). Harlow: Longman Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Oliveira, L. C., & Lan, S.-W.
    (2014) Writing science in an upper elementary classroom: A genre-based approach to teaching English language learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 23–39. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Department of Education NSW
    Department of Education NSW. (n.d.). Teaching English language learners (TELL). Retrieved fromhttps://beta.dec.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/271498/Flyer-EOI-for-host-schools-TELL-PL-2017.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Derewianka, B.
    (2012) Knowledge about language in the Australian curriculum: English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 127–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Echevarria, J., Frey, N., & Fisher, D.
    (2015) What it takes for English learners to succeed. Educational Leadership, 72(6), 22–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D.
    (2008) Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Pearson Education Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fang, Z.
    (2005) Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science education, 89(2), 335–347. 10.1002/sce.20050
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2010) Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587–597. doi:  10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6
    https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibbons, P.
    (2008) “It was good and I learnt a lot”: Intellectual practices and ESL learners in the middle years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 155–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2009) English learners, academic literacy and thinking: Learning in the Challenge Zone. New York: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2014) Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gleeson, M.
    (2015) ‘It’s the nature of the subject’: Secondary teachers’ disciplinary beliefs and decisions about teaching academic language in their content classes. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38(2), 104–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gleeson, M., & Davison, C.
    (2016) A conflict between experience and professional learning: Subject teachers’ beliefs about teaching English language learners. RELC Journal, 47(1), 43–57. 10.1177/0033688216631221
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631221 [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, M.
    (1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. 10.1016/0898‑5898(93)90026‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hammond, J.
    (2014) An Australian perspective on standards-based education, teacher knowledge, and students of English as an additional language. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 507–532. 10.1002/tesq.173
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.173 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hammond, J., & Jones, P.
    (2012) Knowledge about language and the Australian curriculum: Implications for teachers and students. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 122–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hurst, D., & Davison, C.
    (2005) Collaborating on the curriculum: Focus on secondary ESOL. InJ. Crandall & D. Kaufman (Eds.), Content-based instruction in primary and secondary school settings (pp.41–66). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A.
    (2013) Teacher professional development to improve science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Theory into Practice, 52(2), 110–117. doi:  10.1080/00405841.2013.770328
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770328 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lo Bianco, J.
    (1990) Making language policy: Australia’s experience. InR. B. J. Baldauf & A. Luke (Eds.), Language planning and education in Australasia and the South Pacific (pp.1–22). Philadelphia, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Love, K.
    (2010) Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in the secondary curriculum. Pedagogies, 5(4), 338–355. doi:  10.1080/1554480X.2010.521630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2010.521630 [Google Scholar]
  30. Love, K., & Humphrey, S.
    (2012) A multi-level language toolkit for the Australian Curriculum: English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 173–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin, J. R.
    (2013) Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 23–37. doi:  10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2008) Genre relations: Mapping culture. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 30(2), 376–380.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Masny, D.
    (1997) Linguistic awareness and writing: Exploring the relationship with language awareness. Language Awareness, 6(2–3), 105–118. 10.1080/09658416.1997.9959921
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1997.9959921 [Google Scholar]
  34. Morgan, C., Craig, T., Schuette, M., & Wagner, D.
    (2014) Language and communication in mathematics education: An overview of research in the field. ZDM, 46(6), 843–853. doi:  10.1007/s11858‑014‑0624‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0624-9 [Google Scholar]
  35. New South Wales (NSW) Education Standards Authority (NESA)
    New South Wales (NSW) Education Standards Authority (NESA) (2017) NSW supplementary documentation: Elaborations in priority areas. Retrieved fromeducationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/wcm/connect/603968d0-871e-4f0e-820f-98d6dfc736ff/elaboration-in-priority-areas.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=
  36. O’Hallaron, C. L., Palinscar, A. S., & Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2015) Reading science: Using systemic functional linguistics to support critical language awareness. Linguistics and Education, 32, Part A, 55–67. doi:  10.1016/j.linged.2015.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ollerhead, S.
    (2017) Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing Australian pre-service teachers to support English language learners. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 256–266. 10.1080/1359866X.2016.1246651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1246651 [Google Scholar]
  38. Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P.
    (2009) Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 313–319. 10.1007/s11165‑008‑9111‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9111-z [Google Scholar]
  39. Polat, N., & Mahalingappa, L.
    (2013) Pre- and in-service teachers’ beliefs about ELLs in content area classes: A case for inclusion, responsibility, and instructional support. Teaching Education, 24(1), 58–83. 10.1080/10476210.2012.713930
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.713930 [Google Scholar]
  40. Premier, J. A., & Miller, J.
    (2010) Preparing pre-service teachers for multicultural classrooms. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 35–48. 10.14221/ajte.2010v35n2.3
    https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n2.3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Reeves, J. R.
    (2006) Secondary teacher attitudes toward including English-language learners in mainstream classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 131–142. doi:  10.3200/JOER.99.3.131‑143
    https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.3.131-143 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
    (2012) Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2013) The role of metalanguage supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63, 153–170. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00742.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x [Google Scholar]
  44. (2016) Content-based language teaching with functional grammar in the elementary school. Language Teaching, 49(1), 116–128. doi:  10.1017/S0261444814000093
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000093 [Google Scholar]
  45. Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C.
    (2011) Understanding students’ language use about expansion through analyzing their lexicogrammatical resources. Science Education, 95(5), 852–876. 10.1002/sce.20448
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20448 [Google Scholar]
  46. Turkan, S., de Oliveira, L., Lee, O., & Phelps, G.
    (2014) Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Unsworth, L.
    (1999) Developing critical understanding of the specialised language of school science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(7), 508.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Veel, R.
    (1997) Learning how to mean – scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. InF. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp.161–195). London and Washington: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2006) The Write it Right project – Linguistic modelling of secondary school and the workplace. InR. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, & A. McCabe (Eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches (pp.66–92). London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Walqui, A., & van Lier, L.
    (2010) Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners. San Francisco: WestEd.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J.
    (2001) Language and literacy in science education. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error