1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 42, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study explores the most perceivable phonological features of Hong Kong (HK) L2 English speakers and how they affect the perception of HK L2 English speech from the perspective of both native and non-native English listeners. Conversational interviews were conducted to collect speech data from 20 HK speakers of English and 10 native speakers of English in the United Kingdom. Phonological features of 20 HK speakers of English were analyzed at both segmental and suprasegmental levels. Forty listeners with different language backgrounds were recruited to listen and rate the speech samples of the 20 HK speakers of English in terms of the cognitive perception of foreign accentedness and comprehensibility and affective perception of likability and acceptability. This study identifies the phonological variables that contribute significantly to listeners’ perception of accentedness, comprehensibility, likability, acceptability, and overall impression of HK speakers’ English speech.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.18010.che
2019-07-04
2025-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.18010.che
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, D.
    (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, C.
    (1979) English speech rhythm and the foreign learner. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110879247
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879247 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K.
    (1992) The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01043.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Koehler, K.
    (1988) The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38(4), 561–613. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1988.tb00167.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00167.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Venkatagiri, H.
    (1994) Syllable duration and pausing in the speech of Chinese ESL speakers. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 807–812. 10.2307/3587566
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587566 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolton, K., & Kwok, H.
    (1990) The dynamics of the Hong Kong accent: Social identity and sociolinguistic description. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 1(1), 147–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T.
    (2008) Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707–729. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Breckler, S. J.
    (1984) Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1191–1205. 10.1037/0022‑3514.47.6.1191
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brennan, E., & Brennan, S.
    (1981) Accent scaling: Language attitudes and reactions toward Mexican-American English speech. Language and Speech, 24(3), 207–221. 10.1177/002383098102400301
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400301 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bresnahan, M. J., Ohashi, R., Nebashi, R., Liu, W. Y., & Shearman, S. M.
    (2002) Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Language & Communication, 22(2), 171–185. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(01)00025‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00025-8 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, K.
    (1968) Intelligibility. InA. Davies (Ed.), Language testing symposium (pp.180–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cargile, A. C.
    (1997) Attitudes toward Chinese-accented speech: An investigation in two contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(4), 434–443. 10.1177/0261927X970164004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970164004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cargile, A. C., & Giles, H.
    (1998) Language attitudes toward varieties of English: An American-Japanese context. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(3), 338–356. 10.1080/00909889809365511
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365511 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cargile, A. C., Giles, H., Ryan, E. B., & Bradac, J. J.
    (1994) Language Attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions. Language & Communication: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 211–236. 10.1016/0271‑5309(94)90001‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)90001-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chan, A. Y. W.
    (2006) Strategies used by Cantonese speakers in pronouncing English initial consonant clusters: Insights into the interlanguage phonology of Cantonese ESL learners in Hong Kong. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(4), 331–355. 10.1515/IRAL.2006.015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2010) An investigation into Cantonese ESL learners’ acquisition of English initial consonant clusters. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 48(1), 99–141. 10.1515/ling.2010.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chan, A. Y. W., & Li, D. C. S.
    (2000) English and Cantonese phonology in contrast: Explaining Cantonese ESL learners’ English pronunciation problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(1), 67–85. 10.1080/07908310008666590
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666590 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chang, J.
    (1987) Chinese speaker, learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems (2nd ed.). InM. Swan & B. Smith (Eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, H. C.
    (2010) Second language timing patterns and their effects on native listeners’ perceptions. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 36(2), 183–212.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2011) Judgments of intelligibility and foreign accent by listeners of different language backgrounds. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(4), 61–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (2015) Acoustic analyses and intelligibility assessments of timing patterns among Chinese English learners with different dialect backgrounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(6), 749–773. 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9315‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9315-5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, Y., Robb, M. P., Gilbert, H. R., & Lerman, J. W.
    (2001) A study of sentence stress production in Mandarin speakers of American English. Journal of Acoustic. Society of American, 4, 1681–1690. 10.1121/1.1356023
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1356023 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, H. C., & Wang, Q.
    (2016) The Effects of Chinese learners’ English acoustic-prosodic patterns on listeners’ attitudinal judgments. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(2), 91–108. 10.17576/3L‑2016‑2202‑07
     https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2202-07 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2014, October). Acoustic analyses of prosodic features of Chinese learners of English and their effects on attitudinal judgments. Paper presented at2014 International Conference on Phonetic Research and Language Learning (ICPRLL) & English Phonetic Conference in China (EPCC), Human University, Changsha, China.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2001) What speaking rate do nonnative listeners prefer?Applied Linguistics, 22, 324–337. 10.1093/applin/22.3.324
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.3.324 [Google Scholar]
  26. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Deterding, D., Wong, J., & Kirkpatrick, A.
    (2008) The pronunciation of Hong Kong English. English World-wide, 29(2), 148–175. 10.1075/eww.29.2.03det
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.29.2.03det [Google Scholar]
  28. Eady, S.
    (1982) Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: Tone language versus stress language. Language Speech, 25, 29–42. 10.1177/002383098202500103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500103 [Google Scholar]
  29. Eisenchlas, S. A., & Tsurutani, C.
    (2011) You sound attractive! Perceptions of accented English in a multilingual environment. Australian Review of Applied linguistics, 34(2), 216–236. 10.1075/aral.34.2.05eis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.2.05eis [Google Scholar]
  30. Field, J.
    (2005) Intelligibility and the Listener: The Role of Lexical Stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. 10.2307/3588487
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487 [Google Scholar]
  31. Flege, J. E.
    (1988) The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. InH. Winitz (Ed.), Human communication and its disorders: A review (pp.224–401). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M.
    (1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34(1), 65–87. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1984.tb00996.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00996.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Giles, H., Williams, A., Mackie, D., & Rosselli, F.
    (1995) Reactions to Anglo and Hispanic-American accented speakers: Affect, identity, persuasion, and the English-only controversy. Language and Communication, 15(2), 107–120. 10.1016/0271‑5309(94)00019‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)00019-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Griffiths, R.
    (1990) Speech rate and NNS comprehension. Language Learning, 40(3), 311–336. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00666.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00666.x [Google Scholar]
  35. (1992) Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 385–390. 10.2307/3587015
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587015 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hansen Edwards, J.
    (2015) The deletion of /t, d/ in Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 35(1), 60–77. 10.1111/weng.12166
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12166 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2018) TH variation in Hong Kong English. English Language and Linguistics, 1–30. doi:  10.1017/S1360674318000035
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674318000035 [Google Scholar]
  38. Heike, A. E.
    (1987) The Resolution of dynamic speech in L2 listening. Language Learning, 37, 123–139. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1968.tb01315.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1968.tb01315.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Hinofitis, F. B., & Bailey, K. M.
    (1981) American undergraduates’ reactions to the communication skills of foreign teaching assistants. InJ. Fisher, M. Clarke, & J. Schachter (Eds.), On TESOL ’80: Building bridges (pp.120–133). Washington, D.C.: TESOL Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang, B. H.
    (2013) The effects of accent familiarity and language teaching experience on raters’ judgments of non-native speech. System, 41(3), 770–785. 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hung, T. N.
    (2000) Towards a phonology of Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 19(3), 337–356. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00183
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00183 [Google Scholar]
  42. Jenkins, J.
    (2000) The phonology of English as an international language. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (2002) A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23, 83–103. 10.1093/applin/23.1.83
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.83 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jesney, K.
    (2004) The use of global foreign accent rating in studies of L2 acquisition. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Language Research Centre Reports.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kang, O.
    (2010) Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 301–315. 10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2013) Relative impact of pronunciation features on ratings of non-native speakers’ oral proficiency. InJ. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp.10–15). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kang, O., & Pickering, L.
    (2013) Using acoustic and temporal analysis for assessing speaking. InA. Kunnan (Ed.), Companion to Language Assessment (pp.1047–1062). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla056
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla056 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L.
    (2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 554–566. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01091.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2008) Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 459–489. 10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kormos, J., & Denes, M.
    (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kraut, R., & Wulff, S.
    (2013) Foreign-accented speech perception ratings: A multifactorial case study. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 34(3), 249–263. 10.1080/01434632.2013.767340
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.767340 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K.
    (2011) A course in phonetics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ladegaard, Hans J.
    (2000) Language attitudes and sociolinguistic behaviour: Exploring attitude-behaviour relations in language. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 214–233. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00112
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00112 [Google Scholar]
  54. Luke, K. K., & Richards, J. C.
    (1982) English in Hong Kong: Functions and status. English World-Wide, 3, 47–61. 10.1075/eww.3.1.04kan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.3.1.04kan [Google Scholar]
  55. Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J.
    (2002) Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269–282. 10.1037/0022‑3514.82.3.269
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.269 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mok, P. K., & Dellwo, V.
    (2008) Comparing native and nonnative speech rhythm using acoustic rhythmic measures: Cantonese, Beijing Mandarin and English. Retrieved fromwww.cuhk.hk/lin/people/peggey/Mok&Dellwo_SP2008.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Munro, M., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995a) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995b) Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306. 10.1177/002383099503800305
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800305 [Google Scholar]
  59. (1998) The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48, 159–182. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00038
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00038 [Google Scholar]
  60. (1999) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the apeech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49, 285–310. 10.1111/0023‑8333.49.s1.8
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2001) Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451–468.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L.
    (2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131. 10.1017/S0272263106060049
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049 [Google Scholar]
  63. Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Sato, K.
    (2006) Salient accents, covert attitudes: Consciousness-raising for pre-service second language teachers. Prospect, 21(1), 67–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Nelson, C.
    (1995) Intelligibility and world Englishes in the classroom. World Englishes, 14, 273–279. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1995.tb00356.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1995.tb00356.x [Google Scholar]
  65. Peng, L., & Jane Setter, J.
    (2000) The emergence of systematicity in the English pronunciations of two Cantonese-speaking adults in Hong Kong. English World-Wide21, 81–108. 10.1075/eww.21.1.05pen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.21.1.05pen [Google Scholar]
  66. Pickering, L.
    (2004) The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 19–43. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(03)00020‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00020-6 [Google Scholar]
  67. Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J.
    (2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 [Google Scholar]
  68. Richards, J. C.
    (1983) Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 219–239. 10.2307/3586651
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586651 [Google Scholar]
  69. Riggenbach, H.
    (1991) Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14, 423–441. 10.1080/01638539109544795
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795 [Google Scholar]
  70. Riney, T. J., Takagi, N., & Inutsuka, K.
    (2005) Phonetic parameters and perceptual judgments of accent in English by American and Japanese Listeners. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 441–466. 10.2307/3588489
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588489 [Google Scholar]
  71. Setter, J.
    (2008) Consonant clusters in Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 27(3–4), 502–515. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2008.00581.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00581.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Setter, J., & Deterding, D.
    (2003) Extra final consonants in the English of Hong Kong and Singapore. InSolé, M. J., Recasens, D. and Romero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, pp.1875–1878.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Setter, J., Wong, C. S. P., & Chan, B. H. S.
    (2010) Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Sewell, A.
    (2009) World Englishes, English as a Lingua Franca and the case of Hong Kong English. English Today, 25(1), 37–43. 10.1017/S0266078409000066
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078409000066 [Google Scholar]
  75. Stibbard, R.
    (2004) The spoken English of Hong Kong: A study of co-occurring segmental errors. Language. Culture and Curriculum, 17, 127–142. 10.1080/07908310408666688
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310408666688 [Google Scholar]
  76. Tajima, K., Port, R., & Dalby, J.
    (1997) Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0031
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0031 [Google Scholar]
  77. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W.
    (2006) Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30. 10.1017/S0272263106060013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013 [Google Scholar]
  78. Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 905–916. 10.1017/S1366728912000168
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
  79. Warren, P., Elgort, I., & Crabbe, D.
    (2009) Comprehensibility and prosody ratings for pronunciation software development. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 87–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Wennerstrom, A.
    (1998) Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1–25. 10.1017/S0272263198001016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198001016 [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhang, Y., Nissen, S., & Francis, A. L.
    (2008) Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4498–4513. 10.1121/1.2902165
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2902165 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.18010.che
Loading
The effects of Hong Kong L2 English speakers’ phonological features on listeners’ cognitive and affective perceptions
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 42, 84 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18010.che
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.18010.che
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.18010.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): foreign accent; second language pronunciation; speech production and perception

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error