1887
image of Exploring the effects of web-based communication tasks on the development and transferability of audience awareness in
L2 writers
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article reports on two quasi-experimental studies that investigated the possible development and transfer of audience awareness in novice EFL writers as they engaged in online writing tasks through a Social Networking Service (SNS). Japanese students from two universities were asked to write, read, and comment on other students’ writing once a week. The two studies were arranged sequentially so as to capture in an exploratory but jointly illuminating manner whether and how the “elusive” ( ) construct of “sense of audience” can develop and transfer across genres. The results of both studies suggest that the SNS environment can help L2 writers develop audience awareness and transfer that awareness across genres when two conditions are met: (1) the genre of the SNS tasks should be perceived as similar to that for which transfer was expected; and (2) the students did not develop a sense of audience in previous writing instruction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.18035.sas
2020-02-20
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, V., & Ota, H.
    (2011) Mixi diary versus Facebook photos: Social networking site use among Japanese and Caucasian American females. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 40(1), 39–63. 10.1080/17475759.2011.558321
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2011.558321 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bitchener, J., Storch, N., & Wette, R.
    (Eds.) (2017) Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315269665
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315269665 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, J. C., & Brown, K. L.
    (2012) The effects of authentic audience on English as a second language (ESL) writers: A task-based, computer-mediated approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 435–454. 10.1080/09588221.2011.606224
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.606224 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cho, H.
    (2017) Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 37–51. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cresswell, J. W.
    (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DePalma, M., & Ringer, J. M.
    (2011) Toward a theory of adaptive transfer: Expanding disciplinary discussions of “transfer” in second-language writing and composition studies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 134–147. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A.
    (2017) Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 52–60. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S.
    (2014) Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hafner, C. A.
    (2013) Digital composition in a second or foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 830–834. 10.1002/tesq.135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.135 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyland, K.
    (2005) Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 363–377. 10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  12. James, M. A.
    (2008) The influence of perceptions of task similarity/difference on learning transfer in second language writing. Written Communication, 25(1), 76–103. 10.1177/0741088307309547
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307309547 [Google Scholar]
  13. Johns, A. M.
    (1997) Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524650
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524650 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2008) Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(1), 237–252. 10.1017/S0261444807004892
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004892 [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, M., & Storch, N.
    (2017) Second language writing in the age of CMC: Affordances, multimodality, and collaboration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 1–4. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Messick, S.
    (1992) Validity of test interpretation and use. InM. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed.) (pp.1487–1491). New York: MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J.
    (2014) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Napierkowski, H.
    (2001, March) Collaborative learning and sense of audience in two computer-mediated discourse communities. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Denver, CO.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A.
    (2017) Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H.
    (2009) Situated writing practices in foreign language settings: The role of previous experience and instruction. InR. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp.23–48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691859‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691859-005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sasaki, M.
    (2002) Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. InS. Ransdell & M-L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp.49–80). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0363‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0363-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011) Effects of varying lengths of study-abroad experiences on Japanese EFL students’ L2 writing ability and motivation: A longitudinal study. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 81–105. 10.5054/tq.2011.240861
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240861 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K.
    (1996) Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning, 46(1), 137–174. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1996.tb00643.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00643.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Sasaki, M., Kozaki, Y., & Ross, S. J.
    (2017) The impact of normative environments on learner motivation and L2 reading ability growth. Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 163–178. 10.1111/modl.12381
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12381 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sasaki, M., Mizumoto, A., & Murakami, A.
    (2018) Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self-regulation perspective. Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 1–18. 10.1111/modl.12469
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12469 [Google Scholar]
  26. Tardy, C. M.
    (2017) The challenge of genre in the academic writing classroom: Implications for L2 writing teacher education. InJ. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp.69–83). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315269665‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315269665-5 [Google Scholar]
  27. Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & De Maeyer, S.
    (2017) In-school and out-of-school multimodal writing as an L2 writing resource for beginner learners of Dutch. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 23–36. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  28. Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D.
    (2007) Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–23. 10.1017/S0267190508070013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070013 [Google Scholar]
  29. Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K.
    (2004) The influence of attitude and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00250.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.18035.sas
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.18035.sas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: learning transfer; audience awareness; SNS; argumentative writing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error