Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In the linguistic landscapes (LL) literature there is frequent mention of the viewing of public locales by passers-by, owners, and tourists, who necessarily enter and exit locales in different ways, times, and conditions. This paper extends our understanding of the viewing of LL by investigating the discursive constructions of the bathroom of a shared home through the voices of its residents: six Vietnamese international students studying in Australia. When the residents of the home were asked to reflect on their perceptions of language in this locale, the findings show that they attend to the inscriptions on the artifacts, the linguistic activities that take place within the locale, or see no LL whatsoever because of the ways they construct the locale. The findings suggest that linguists need to give more consideration to the types of linguistic activities that occur in a locale in exploration of how individuals view their LL.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aiestaran, J., Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
    (2010) Multilingual cityscapes: Perceptions and preferences of the inhabitants of the city of Donostia-San Sebastian. InE. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.219–234). Bristol, Buffalo, & Toronto: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑014
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-014 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amevuvor, J., & Hafer, G.
    (2019) Communities in the stalls: A study of latrinalia linguistic landscapes. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 16(2), 90–106. doi:  10.1080/15427587.2018.1446141
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2018.1446141 [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrod, R.
    (1997) The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203–226. doi:  10.1177/0022002797041002001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041002001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Backhaus, P.
    (2006) Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 52–66. doi:  10.1080/14790710608668385
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668385 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2007) Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon, Buffalo, & Toronto: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blunt, A., & Dowling, R.
    (2006) Home. Hoboken: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203401354
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203401354 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruyèl-Olmedo, A., & Juan-Garau, M.
    (2015) Shaping tourist LL: Language display and the sociolinguistic background of an international multilingual readership. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 51–67. doi:  10.1080/14790718.2013.827688
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2013.827688 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chmielewska, E.
    (2010) Semiosis takes place or radical uses of quaint theories. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp.274–291). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chow, K., & Healey, M.
    (2008) Place attachment and place identity: First-year undergraduates making the transition from home to university. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 362–372. doi:  10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dagenais, D., Moore, D., Sabatier, C., Lamarre, P., & Armand, F.
    (2009) Linguistic landscape and language awareness. InE. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp.253–269). New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S.
    (2018) Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on- and offline. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑61955‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61955-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Garvin, R. T.
    (2010) Responses to the linguistic landscape in Memphis, Tennessee: An urban space in transition. InE. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.235–251). Bristol, Buffalo, & Toronto: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑016
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-016 [Google Scholar]
  13. Giddens, A.
    (1990) The consequences of modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gieryn, T. F.
    (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463–496. doi:  10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gorter, D., Marten, H. F., & Van Mensel, L.
    (Eds.) (2012) Minority languages in the linguistic landscape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230360235
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360235 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanauer, D. I.
    (2010) Laboratory identity: A linguistic landscape analysis of personalized space within a microbiology laboratory. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 7(2–3), 152–172. doi:  10.1080/15427581003757442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15427581003757442 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J.
    (2006) Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. doi:  10.1080/17450100500489189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hickey, R.
    (2014) The psychological dimensions of shared space in Belfast. City, 18(4–5), 440–446. doi:  10.1080/13604813.2014.939482
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.939482 [Google Scholar]
  19. Holton, M.
    (2017) A place for sharing: The emotional geographies of peer-sharing in UK University halls of residences. Emotion, Space and Society, 22(C), 4–12. doi:  10.1016/j.emospa.2016.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2016.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
    (2010) Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kitis, E. D., & Milani, T. M.
    (2015) The performativity of the body. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 268–290. doi:  10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit [Google Scholar]
  22. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y.
    (1997) Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. doi:  10.1177/0261927X970161002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Leeman, J., & Modan, G.
    (2009) Commodified language in Chinatown: A contextualized approach to linguistic landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 332–362. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00409.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00409.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Leong, P.
    (2016) American graffiti: Deconstructing gendered communication patterns in bathroom stalls. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(3), 306–327. doi:  10.1080/0966369X.2014.991705
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.991705 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lou, J. J.
    (2016) The linguistic landscape of Chinatown: A sociolinguistic ethnography. Bristol & Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095636
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095636 [Google Scholar]
  26. Malinowski, D.
    (2009) Authorship in the linguistic landscape: A multimodal-performative view. InE. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp.107–125). New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Manan, S. A., David, M. K., Dumanig, F. P., & Naqeebullah, K.
    (2015) Politics, economics and identity: Mapping the linguistic landscape of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 31–50. doi:  10.1080/14790718.2014.905581
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2014.905581 [Google Scholar]
  28. Molz, J. G.
    (2008) Global abode: Home and mobility in narratives of round-the-world travel. Space and Culture, 11(4), 325–342. doi:  10.1177/1206331207308333
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331207308333 [Google Scholar]
  29. Moriarty, M.
    (2015) Indexing authenticity: The linguistic landscape of an Irish tourist town. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2015(232), 195–214. doi:  10.1515/ijsl‑2014‑0049
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0049 [Google Scholar]
  30. Munro, M., & Madigan, R.
    (1999) Negotiating space in the family home. InI. Cieraad (Ed.), At home: An anthropology of domestic space (pp.107–117). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nguyen, T. C.
    (2010) Challenges of learning English in Australia towards students coming from selected Southeast Asian countries: Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia. International Education Studies, 4(1), 13–20. doi:  10.5539/ies.v4n1p13
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n1p13 [Google Scholar]
  32. Peck, A., & Stroud, C.
    (2015) Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 133–151. doi:  10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.08pec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.08pec [Google Scholar]
  33. Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E.
    (2015) Metrolingualism: Language in the city. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315724225
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724225 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pietikäinen, S.
    (2014) Spatial interaction in Sámiland: Regulative and transitory chronotopes in the dynamic multilingual landscape of an indigenous Sámi village. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 478–490. doi:  10.1177/1367006913484210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484210 [Google Scholar]
  35. Porteous, J. D.
    (1976) Home: The territorial core. Geographical Review, 66(4), 383–390. doi:  10.2307/213649
    https://doi.org/10.2307/213649 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sheller, M., & Urry, J.
    (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. doi:  10.1068/a37268
    https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268 [Google Scholar]
  37. Shohamy, E., Ben-Rafael, E., & Barni, M.
    (2010) Linguistic landscape in the city. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993 [Google Scholar]
  38. Shohamy, E., & Waksman, S.
    (2009) Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. InE. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp.313–331). New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S.
    (2010) Multilingual signage: A multimodal approach to discourses of consumption in a South African township. Social Semiotics, 20(5), 469–493. doi:  10.1080/10350330.2010.513174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2010.513174 [Google Scholar]
  40. Taylor, S.
    (2015) ‘Home is never fully achieve … even when we are in it’: Migration, belonging and a social exclusion within Punjabi transnational mobility. Mobilities, 10(2), 193–219. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2013.84606
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.84606 [Google Scholar]
  41. Trumper-Hecht, N.
    (2010) Linguistic landscape in mixed cities in Israel from the perspective of ‘walkers’: The case of Arabic. InE. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp.235–251). Bristol, Buffalo, & Toronto: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑015
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-015 [Google Scholar]
  42. Vandenbroucke, M.
    (2015) Language visibility, functionality and meaning across various TimeSpace scales in Brussels’ multilingual landscapes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(2), 163–181. doi:  10.1080/01434632.2014.909442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2014.909442 [Google Scholar]
  43. Watson, S.
    (1986) Housing and the family: The marginalization of non-family households in Britain. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 10(1), 8–28. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2427.1986.tb00002.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1986.tb00002.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Weintraub, J.
    (1997) The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. InJ. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy (pp.1–42). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error