1887
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Baker and Freebody (1989) argued that the teaching of reading was the teaching of culture, and in learning the culture of schooling, children were learning how to respond to the authority of the teacher and the school texts. Their interest in analysing the talk around text which occurred in primary schools lay in critiquing the politics of school knowledge. In this paper, a transitivity analysis within a systemic functional grammar will be used to explore what the discourse of reading lessons looks like in one secondary school context, to examine what is being communicated about the culture of schooling and to come to a different conclusion to that of Baker and Freebody about the value of teacher and text-authorising strategies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.19.2.01lov
1996-01-01
2019-09-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, C. and P. Freebody
    (1989) Talk around text: Constructions of textual and teacher authority in classroom discourse. In S. De Castell , A. Luke and C. Luke (eds) Language, authority and criticism. London, Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes, D. , J. Britton , and H. Rosen
    1971 Language, the learner and the school. Harmondsworth, Penguin Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein, B.
    (1990) The social construction of pedagogic discourse. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloome, D.
    (1989) Locating the learning of reading and writing in classrooms: Beyond deficit, difference and effectiveness models. Norwood, NJ, Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Christie, F.
    (1994) On pedagogic discourse: Final report of a research activity funded by the ARC 1990-2Institute of Education, The University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clyne, M.
    (1980) Writing, testing and culture. The Secondary Teacher11:32–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards, A. D.
    (1980) Patterns of power and authority in classroom talk. London, Croom Helm.
  8. Fairclough, N.
    (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge, Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Foucault, M.
    (1972) The archaeology of knowledge ( A.M. Sheridan Smith , trans.) London, Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gee, J. P.
    (1990) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, J. and G. Weade
    (1990) The social construction of classroom reading: Beyond method. Australian Journal of Reading, 13,4: 326–336.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Green, J. and R. Kantor-Martin
    (1988) Exploring the complexity of language and learning in the life of the classroom. Paper presented atthe Language and Learning Symposium. University of Queensland, Brisbane.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gregory, M. and K. Malcolm
    (1981) Generic Situation and discourse phaseApplied Linguistics Research Working Group, Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M.
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar (Second ed.) Melbourne, Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunter, I.
    (1991) Learning the literate lesson: The limits of the aesthetic personality. In C. Baker and A. Luke (eds.) Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy, John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.19.06hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.19.06hun [Google Scholar]
  16. (1994) Four anxieties about English. Interpretations, 27,3:1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Iser, W.
    (1978) The act of reading. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Love, K.
    (1991) Towards a further analysis of teacher talk. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 14,2: 30–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1994) A discourse analytic model of reflective practice. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 22, 2: 151–162. doi: 10.1080/0311213940220205
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0311213940220205 [Google Scholar]
  20. Love, K. and D. Suherdi
    (in press) The negotiation of knowledge in an adult ESL class. Linguistics and Education, 7,4.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mehan, H.
    (1979) Learning lessons. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 [Google Scholar]
  22. (1984) Language and schooling. Sociology of Education, 57, 174–183. doi: 10.2307/2112601
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2112601 [Google Scholar]
  23. (1985).the structure of classroom discourse. London, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (199l) The school’s work of sorting students. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nystrand, M. and A. Gamoran
    (1991) Instructional discourse, student engagement and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 3: 261–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Perrott, C.
    (1988) classroom talk and pupil learning. Sydney, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Reid, I.
    (1992) Who framed the text?In J. Thomson (ed.)Reconstructing literature teaching. Sydney, Australian Association of the Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rothery, J.
    (1995) Exploring literacy in school English. Sydney, Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sinclair, J. M. and R. M. Coulthard
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse. London, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wallace, C.
    (1992) On reading. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.19.2.01lov
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error