Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Professional engineers must move easily between concretization and abstraction in written communication, while remaining rooted in the context of the particular engineering problem to be solved. Engineering programmes often seek to use a replicated professional situation in order to prepare students for the workplace; however, there are questions as to how a decontextualized task prepares students for the language and knowledge requirements of the field. This paper reports on the findings of a Master’s research project, which investigated this issue through a comparison of two sets of engineering feasibility studies: publicly available industry texts and English as an Additional Language (EAL) student texts from a Master’s engineering program. The findings show that while the corpora have some similarities, there are differences that suggest that the student texts are less bound to the concrete reality of their project, which has implications for those working in disciplinary and professional literacies.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Australian Education International (AEI)
    Australian Education International (AEI) (2010) International graduate outcomes and employer perceptions. Canberra: AEI.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein, B.
    (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (revised edition). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Community Energy for Goulburn (CE4G)
    Community Energy for Goulburn (CE4G) (2016) A study into the feasibility of a community owned solar farm in Goulburn NSW. The Goulburn Group. Retrieved fromwww.ce4g.org.au/index.php
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Curry, M. J., & Hanauer, D.
    (Eds.) (2014) Language, literacy and learning in STEM education: Research methods and perspectives from applied linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lsse.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Engineers Australia
    Engineers Australia (2016) Stage 1 competency for professional engineers. Retrieved fromwww.engineersaustralia.org.au
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gardner, S.
    (2012) Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 52–63. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodman, N., Muster, T., De Silva, K., Sanguansri, P., Hall, M., & Toze, S.
    (2014) Feasibility study for increasing water recycling at the Kellogg plant, Botany, NSW. Brisbane: Australian Water Recycling Centre of Excellence. Retrieved fromvuir.vu.edu.au/32272/1/Kellogg%2B-%2BFINAL.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gwilliams, L., & Fontaine, L.
    (2015) Indeterminacy in process type classification. Functional Linguistics, 2(8), 1–19. doi:  10.1186/s40554‑015‑0021‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0021-x [Google Scholar]
  9. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2014) An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hanifan, R.
    (2014) Concise dictionary of engineering: A guide to the language of engineering. Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑07839‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07839-7 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hao, J.
    (2015) Construing Biology: An ideational perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  12. Hionis, D., Cornish, S., Trezise, F., & Murphy, R.
    (2015) Moonambel water supply feasibility study. MWH, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved fromwww.chw.net.au/sites/default/files/documents/moonambel_water_supply_feasibility_report_reve.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Luzon, M. J.
    (2005) Genre analysis in technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(3), 285–295. 10.1109/TPC.2005.853937
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.853937 [Google Scholar]
  14. Maton, K.
    (2014) Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2016) Building knowledge about knowledge building. InK. Maton, S. Hood, & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory (pp.1–23). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Maton, K., & Doran, Y. J.
    (2017) SFL and code theory. InT. Bartlett & G. O’Grady (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp.605–618). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2007) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2008) Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McKenna, B.
    (1997) How engineers write: An empirical study of engineering report writing. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 189–211. 10.1093/applin/18.2.189
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.189 [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Der Wijngaart, B., Pemberton, C., & Herring, D.
    (2009) Wind Power Concept Study Report. Australia: Wind Power Concept Study Working Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wolff, K.
    (2013) ‘Reservoirs’ and ‘Repertoires’: Epistemological and discursive complexities in multidisciplinary engineering practice. Journal of Academic Writing, 3(1), 84–94. 10.18552/joaw.v3i1.94
    https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v3i1.94 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2017) The manufacturing sector’s response to the lack of appropriate technical expertise in South Africa. InB. Collier-Reed (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the South African Society for Engineering Education (pp.439–441). Cape Town: South African Society for Engineering Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolff, K., & Luckett, K.
    (2013) Integrating multidisciplinary engineering knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 78–92. 10.1080/13562517.2012.694105
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.694105 [Google Scholar]
  24. Wolmarans, N.
    (2016) Inferential reasoning in design: Relations between material product and specialised disciplinary knowledge. Design Studies, 45(A), 92–115. doi:  10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.003 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error