Volume 43, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study draws on Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), particularly semantic gravity waving, as a strategy for academic literacies practitioners to conceptualise how knowledge in their field might be organised and presented. Students can be guided to notice meanings related to context-dependency at the discourse and lexico-grammatical levels through the presentation of semantic gravity waving profiles. For this study, semantic gravity waving profiles have been found useful for explaining the rationale of a genre pedagogy approach, the structure of an Introduction-Method-Results-Discussion (IMRD) genre, and teaching both lexical coherence for a theoretical framework section, and accurate use of determiners with non-count abstract nouns such as “research”. Therefore, semantic gravity profiling seems to provide explanatory power as a pedagogical tool in the classroom. Findings from a mixed method survey with sixty students as well as extracts from student texts before and after semantic gravity waving profile pedagogical interventions are provided.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aitchison, C. C., & Scraton, S.
    (2007) Sport and gender identities. New York, NY: Routledge Press. 10.4324/9780203646649
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203646649 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F.
    (2010) Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260. 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G.
    (2008) Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of teacher education, 59(5), 389–407. 10.1177/0022487108324554
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ballinger, S., & Lyster, R.
    (2011) Student and teacher oral language use in a two-way Spanish/English immersion school. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 289–306. 10.1177/1362168811401151
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401151 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernstein, B.
    (1975) Class and pedagogies: Visible and invisible. Educational studies, 1(1), 23–41. 10.1080/0305569750010105
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569750010105 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bister, M. D.
    (2018) The concept of chronicity in action: Everyday classification practices and the shaping of mental health care. Sociology of health & illness, 40(1), 38–52. 10.1111/1467‑9566.12623
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12623 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boardley, I. D., & Grix, J.
    (2014) Doping in bodybuilders: A qualitative investigation of facilitative psychosocial processes. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 6(3), 422–439. 10.1080/2159676X.2013.766809
    https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2013.766809 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boughey, C.
    (2013) What are we thinking of? A critical overview of approaches to developing academic literacy in South African higher education. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 25–41. 10.4314/jlt.v47i2.2
    https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i2.2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boughey, C., & McKenna, S.
    (2016) Academic literacy and the decontextualised learner. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blackie, M. A.
    (2014) Creating semantic waves: Using Legitimation Code Theory as a tool to aid the teaching of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 462–469. 10.1039/C4RP00147H
    https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00147H [Google Scholar]
  11. Bozalek, V., D. Ng’ambi, D. Wood, J. Herrington, J. Hardman, & A. Amory
    (Eds) (2015) Activity Theory, authentic learning and emerging technologies: Towards a transformative higher education pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chare, N.
    (2014) Literary veins: Women’s bodybuilding, muscle worship and abject performance. Performance Research, 19(1), 91–101. 10.1080/13528165.2014.908088
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2014.908088 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chuang, F. Y., & Nesi, H.
    (2006) An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of L2 English produced by Chinese students. Corpora, 1(2), 251–271. 10.3366/cor.2006.1.2.251
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2006.1.2.251 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarence, S.
    (2014) Enabling cumulative knowledge-building through teaching: A Legitimation Code Theory analysis of pedagogic practice in law and political science. Unpublished PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa [available atwww.legitimationcodetheory.com].
  15. (2016) Exploring the nature of disciplinary teaching and learning using Legitimation Code Theory Semantics. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 123–137. 10.1080/13562517.2015.1115972
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1115972 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clarence, S., & McKenna, S.
    (2017) Developing academic literacies through understanding the nature of disciplinary knowledge. London Review of Education, 15(1), 38–49. 10.18546/LRE.15.1.04
    https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.1.04 [Google Scholar]
  17. Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. P.
    (2012) Academic literacies and systemic functional linguistics: how do they relate?Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 64–75. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W.
    (2005) Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & society, 19(6), 829–859. 10.1177/0891243205278639
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639 [Google Scholar]
  19. Coyle, D.
    (2008) CLIL - a pedagogical approach from the European perspective. InN. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Volume4: Second and Foreign Language Education) (pp.97–111). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_92
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_92 [Google Scholar]
  20. Curry, T. J.
    (1993) The effects of receiving a college letter on the sport identity. Sociology of sport Journal, 10(1), 73–87. 10.1123/ssj.10.1.73
    https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.10.1.73 [Google Scholar]
  21. Deng, Z.
    (2018) Bringing knowledge back in: perspectives from liberal education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 335–351. 10.1080/0305764X.2017.1330874
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1330874 [Google Scholar]
  22. Derewianka, B.
    (2003) Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC journal, 34(2), 133–154. 10.1177/003368820303400202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202 [Google Scholar]
  23. Durkheim, E.
    (1933) The division of labor in society (G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
  24. Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K.
    (2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33. 10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen [Google Scholar]
  25. Georgiou, H., Maton, K., & Sharma, M.
    (2014) Recovering knowledge for science education research: Exploring the “Icarus Effect” in student work. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 14(3), 252–268. 10.1080/14926156.2014.935526
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.935526 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobs, C.
    (2013) Academic literacies and the question of knowledge. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 127–40. 10.4314/jlt.v47i2.7
    https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i2.7 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones, R. L., Edwards, C., & Viotto Filho, I. T.
    (2016) Activity theory, complexity and sports coaching: An epistemology for a discipline. Sport, education and society, 21(2), 200–216. 10.1080/13573322.2014.895713
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.895713 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kilpert, L., & Shay, S.
    (2013) Kindling fires: examining the potential for cumulative learning in a Journalism curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 40–52. 10.1080/13562517.2012.678326
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.678326 [Google Scholar]
  30. Macken-Horarik, M.
    (2011) Building a knowledge structure for English: Reflections on the challenges of coherence, cumulative learning, portability and face validity. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 197–213. 10.1177/000494411105500303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411105500303 [Google Scholar]
  31. Macnaught, L., Maton, K., Martin, J. R., & Matruglio, E.
    (2013) Jointly constructing semantic waves: Implications for teacher training. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 50–63. 10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.008 [Google Scholar]
  32. Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J.
    (2013) Content and language integrated learning. InC. Chapelle (Ed.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp.911–20). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols, M. J.
    (2010) The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin, J. R.
    (2017) Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in secondary school science and humanities discourse. Onomázein, 1, 111–148. 10.7764/onomazein.sfl.05
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.05 [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2005) Designing literacy pedagogy: Scaffolding asymmetries. InJ. Webster, C. Matthiessen & R. Hasan (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language (pp.251–280). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2007) Interacting with text: The role of dialogue in learning to read and write. Foreign Languages in China, 4(5), 66–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Maton, K.
    (2000) Languages of legitimation: The structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, 147–67. 10.1080/713655351
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713655351 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2009) Cumulative and segmented learning: Exploring the role of curriculum structures in knowledge building. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 43–57. 10.1080/01425690802514342
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802514342 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2011) Theories and things: The semantics of disciplinarity. InF. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp.62–84). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (2013) Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 8–22. 10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2014a) Building powerful knowledge: The significance of semantic waves. InB. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum (pp.181–197). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137429261_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137429261_12 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2014b) Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2016) Legitimation Code Theory: Building knowledge about knowledge- building. InK. Maton, S. Hood, & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory (pp.1–24). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Maton, K., & Doran, Y. J.
    (2017) Semantic density: A translation device for revealing complexity of knowledge practices in discourse, part 1 – wording. Onomázein, 46–76. 10.7764/onomazein.sfl.03
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.03 [Google Scholar]
  45. Matruglio, E., Maton, K., & Martin, J. R.
    (2013) Time travel: The role of temporality in enabling semantic waves in secondary school teaching. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 38–49. 10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  46. McNamara, M. S.
    (2010) What lies beneath? The underlying principles structuring the field of academic nursing in Ireland. Journal of Professional Nursing, (6), 377–384. 10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Morton, T.
    (2010) Using a genre-based approach to integrating content and language in CLIL: The example of secondary history. InC. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp.81–104). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.7.05mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.05mor [Google Scholar]
  48. Mitchell, R. L. G.
    (2010) Approaching common ground: Defining quality in online education. New Directions for Community Colleges, 150, 89–94. 10.1002/cc.408
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.408 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M.
    (1994) Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right resources for literacy and learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Szenes, E., Tilakaratna, N., & Maton, K.
    (2015) The knowledge practices of critical thinking. InM. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp.573–591). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. 10.1057/9781137378057_34
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_34 [Google Scholar]
  51. Yates, L., & Collins, C.
    (2010) The absence of knowledge in Australian curriculum reforms. European Journal of Education, 45, 89–102. 10.1111/j.1465‑3435.2009.01417.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01417.x [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error