1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 43, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 43, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) has been a key tenet of Australian education policy since its launch over a decade ago. Print media coverage of NAPLAN and myschool.edu.au,1 which displays and compares NAPLAN results across Australia, has played a role in both reporting and shaping this aspect of education policy. This paper uses a corpus-assisted approach to map print media representations of NAPLAN over the first decade of the Program, from 2008 to 2018. Building on previous work on NAPLAN and the print media (Mockler, 20132016), it draws on a corpus of almost 6,000 articles from the Australian national and capital city daily newspapers published between 2008 and 2018. It charts the discursive shifts that have taken place over this period as NAPLAN has transitioned in the public space from a diagnostic tool seen to be useful to educators, to a comparative tool seen to be useful to parents and the general public, and more recently to a contested tool seen to have narrow or limited utility.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.19047.moc
2020-07-03
2023-06-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.19047.moc
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altheide, D. L.
    (1997) The news media, the problem frame, and the production of fear. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(4), 647–668. 10.1111/j.1533‑8525.1997.tb00758.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00758.x [Google Scholar]
  2. (2013) Media logic, social control, and fear. Communication Theory, 23(3), 223–238. doi:  10.1111/comt.12017
     https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Angus, L.
    (2015) School choice: Neoliberal education policy and imagined futures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 395–413. 10.1080/01425692.2013.823835
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.823835 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anthony, L.
    (2018) AntConc (Version 3.5). Tokyo: Waseda University. Retrieved fromwww.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority
    Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (2019) My school. Retrieved fromhttps://www.myschool.edu.au/
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, P.
    (2011) Times may change, but we will always have money: Diachronic variation in recent British English. Journal of English Linguistics, 39(1), 65–88. 10.1177/0075424210368368
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424210368368 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
    (2013) Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920103
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baroutsis, A.
    (2016) Media accounts of school performance: Reinforcing dominant practices of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 567–582. 10.1080/02680939.2016.1145253
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1145253 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berliner, D. C.
    (2005) The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205–213. 10.1177/0022487105275904
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105275904 [Google Scholar]
  10. Biesta, G.
    (2007) Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. 10.1111/j.1741‑5446.2006.00241.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Bolton, R.
    (2018, August15). MySchool decision delayed by doubts about results. Australian Financial Review, p.6.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bourke, T., Ryan, M., & Lloyd, M.
    (2016) The discursive positioning of graduating teachers in accreditation of teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 1–9. 10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  13. Carr, G.
    (2020) ‘Is this normal?’: Examining sex education in a corpus of magazine advice column. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(2). Advance Online Publication. https://benjamins.com/catalog/aral
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chilcott, T.
    (2009a, August8). Student results list a first. The Courier Mail, p.20.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (2009b, August10). Test may not be best – Principals resist ‘limited’ approach. The Courier Mail, p.5.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (2010, May10). NAPLAN boycott averted – Teachers strike deal. The Courier Mail, p.17.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Clarke, M.
    (2012) Talkin’’bout a revolution: The social, political, and fantasmatic logics of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(2), 173–191. 10.1080/02680939.2011.623244
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.623244 [Google Scholar]
  18. Coelli, M., Foster, G., & Leigh, A.
    (2018) Do school principals respond to increased public scrutiny? New survey evidence from Australia. Economic Record, 94(S1), 73–101. 10.1111/1475‑4932.12400
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12400 [Google Scholar]
  19. Commonwealth of Australia
    Commonwealth of Australia (2008) Quality education: The case for an education revolution in our schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Commonwealth Parliament
    Commonwealth Parliament (2013, July26). Australian Education Act. No.67. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00012
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Connell, R. W.
    (2009) Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229. 10.1080/17508480902998421
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480902998421 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2013) Why do market ‘reforms’ persistently increase inequality?Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 279–285. doi:  10.1080/01596306.2013.770253
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.770253 [Google Scholar]
  23. Davies, M.
    (2013) Corpus of News on the Web (NOW): 3+ billion words from 20 countries, updated every day. Retrieved fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/now/
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Doolan, J., & Blackmore, J.
    (2018) Principals’ talking back to mediatised education policies regarding school performance. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 818–839. doi:  10.1080/02680939.2017.1386803
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1386803 [Google Scholar]
  25. Education faces up to testing times
    Education faces up to testing times (2009, May9). The Courier Mail, p.22.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
    (2019) Incorporating text dispersion into keyword analyses. Corpora, 14(1), 77–104. 10.3366/cor.2019.0162
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2019.0162 [Google Scholar]
  27. Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C.
    (2011) Equity and quality of mathematics education: Research and media portrayals. InB. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp.205–222). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gabrielatos, C.
    (2018) Keyness analysis. InC. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review (pp.225–258). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315179346‑11
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179346-11 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gabrielatos, C., McEnery, T., Diggle, P., & Baker, P.
    (2012) The peaks and troughs of corpus-based contextual analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(2), 151–175. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.17.2.01gab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.01gab [Google Scholar]
  30. Gillard, J.
    (2008) NAPLAN national report released [Press release]. Retrieved fromhttps://ministers.employment.gov.au/gillard/naplan-national-report-released
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (2010, January27). Now parents can learn about their kids’ schools. Daily Telegraph, p.27.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gonski, D., Arcus, T., Boston, K., Gould, V., Johnson, W., O’Brien, L., Perry, L., & Roberts, M.
    (2018) Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Retrieved fromhdl.voced.edu.au/10707/456059
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P.
    (2011) Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Retrieved fromhttps://docs.education.gov.au/documents/review-funding-schooling-final-report-december-2011
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gorur, R.
    (2013) My school, my market. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 214–230. doi:  10.1080/01596306.2013.770248
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.770248 [Google Scholar]
  35. Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N.
    (2009) Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. Dordrecht: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall, B.
    (2012, February21). Two-tier system of winners, losers. Canberra Times, p.4.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hall, L.
    (2009, July14). Strike threat over school rankings. The Australian, p.5.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hardie, A.
    (2014) CASS Blog: Log ratio – an informal introduction. Retrieved fromcass.lancs.ac.uk/log-ratio-an-informal-introduction/
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hardy, K.
    (2016, December7). Students going backwards: Education global testing alarm bells for ACT, nation. Canberra Times, pp.1–2.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Hawkes, T.
    (2009, January27). Ladder of opportunity rises above league tables. Sydney Morning Herald, p.11.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hiatt, B.
    (2008, December8). WA kids will cram to improve test results. The West Australian, p.12.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Howell, A.
    (2017) ‘Because then you could never ever get a job!’: Children’s constructions of NAPLAN as high-stakes. Journal of Education Policy, 1–24. doi:  10.1080/02680939.2017.1305451
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1305451 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacks, T., & Cook, H.
    (2017, March17). Big improvers, coasters and strugglers. The Age, p.8.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Keller, C.
    (2010, May18). Two more SA teachers accused of NAPLAN misconduct: Test cheat claims grow. The Advertiser, p.5.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Killick, D.
    (2009, August7). Teacher threat on tests League tables protest. Hobart Mercury, pp.1, 11.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ladwig, J.
    (2018) On the limits to evidence-based learning of educational science. InG. E. Hall, D. M. Gollnick, & L. F. Quinn (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of teaching and learning. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118955901.ch27
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955901.ch27 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lampert, J., Burnett, B., Comber, B., Ferguson, A., & Barnes, N.
    (2018) Quality teaching discourses: A contested terrain. InS. Gannon, R. Hattam, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Resisting educational inequality (pp.150–158). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315109268‑14
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109268-14 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lingard, B.
    (2010) Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147. doi:  10.1080/17508481003731026
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17508481003731026 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Savage, G.
    (2014) Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: The effects of testing and data infrastructures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(5), 710–730. 10.1080/01425692.2014.919846
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.919846 [Google Scholar]
  50. Martin, A.
    (2017, August3). Unanticipated consequences: Don’t deny struggling students a chance at the HSC. Sydney Morning Herald, p.18.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. McKnight, L., & Morgan, A.
    (2019) A broken paradigm? What education needs to learn from evidence-based medicine. Journal of Education Policy, 1–17. doi:  10.1080/02680939.2019.1578902
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1578902 [Google Scholar]
  52. Milburn, C.
    (2012, September10). Lesson learnt: 13 years may not be enough. Sydney Morning Herald, p.14.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mockler, N.
    (2013) Reporting the ‘education revolution’: MySchool.edu.au in the print media. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. (2014) Simple solutions to complex problems: Moral panic and the fluid shift from ‘equity’ to ‘quality’ in education. Review of Education, 2(2), 115–143. 10.1002/rev3.3028
     https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3028 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2016) NAPLAN and the problem frame: Exploring representations of NAPLAN in the print media, 2010 and 2013. InB. Lingard, S. Sellar, & G. Thompson (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment (pp.181–198). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. (2018) Discourses of teacher quality in the Australian print media 2014–2017: A corpus-assisted analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–17. doi:  10.1080/01596306.2018.1553849
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1553849 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mockler, N., & Groundwater-Smith, S.
    (2018) Questioning the language of improvement and reform in education: Reclaiming meaning. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315519579
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315519579 [Google Scholar]
  58. Moore, T.
    (2011, 12March). After MySchool comes the real revolution. The Australian, p.4.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. NSW Education Standards Authority
    NSW Education Standards Authority (2018) Minimum standard online tests. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/20190322064734/https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/11-12/hsc/hsc-minimum-standard/online-tests
  60. Polesel, J., Rice, S., & Dulfer, N.
    (2014) The impact of high-stakes testing on curriculum and pedagogy: A teacher perspective from Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 640–657. 10.1080/02680939.2013.865082
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.865082 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pyne, C.
    (2015) NAPLAN results to be delivered faster [Press release]. Retrieved fromhttps://ministers.education.gov.au/pyne/naplan-results-be-delivered-faster
  62. Ragusa, A. T., & Bousfield, K.
    (2017) ‘It’s not the test, it’s how it’s used!’ Critical analysis of public response to NAPLAN and MySchool Senate Inquiry. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(3), 265–286. doi:  10.1080/01425692.2015.1073100
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1073100 [Google Scholar]
  63. Riddle, S.
    (2018) Resisting educational inequity and the ‘bracketing out’of disadvantage in contemporary schooling. InS. Gannon, R. Hattam, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Resisting educational inequality (pp.16–30). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315109268‑2
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109268-2 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rose, J., Low-Choy, S., Singh, P., & Vasco, D.
    (2018) NAPLAN discourses: A systematic review after the first decade. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–16. doi:  10.1080/01596306.2018.1557111
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1557111 [Google Scholar]
  65. Savage, G. C.
    (2013) Tailored equities in the education market: Flexible policies and practices. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 185–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Scott, M.
    (2010) Problems in investigating keyness, or clearing the undergrowth and marking out trails. InM. Bondi, & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in texts (pp.43–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/scl.41.04sco
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.41.04sco [Google Scholar]
  67. (2018) Wordsmith Tools (Version 7). Stroud, UK: Lexical Analysis Software.
  68. Shine, K.
    (2015) Are Australian teachers making the grade? A study of news coverage of Naplan testing. Media International Australia, 154(1), 25–33. 10.1177/1329878X1515400105
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1515400105 [Google Scholar]
  69. Smith, A.
    (2017, November19). ‘Hothousing students is dishonest’. Sun Herald, p.6.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Taylor, C.
    (2013) Searching for similarity using corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), 81–113. 10.3366/cor.2013.0035
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0035 [Google Scholar]
  71. Testing times when figures don’t add up
    Testing times when figures don’t add up (2009, October15). Daily Telegraph, p.24.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Thompson, G., & Lasic, T.
    (2011, December). Doing something about it: Representations of NAPLAN in the public domain. Paper presented at theAustralian Association for Research in Education, Grand Chancellor Hotel, Hobart.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Tomazin, F.
    (2009, September5). Schools threaten testing boycott. The Age, p.7.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Topsfield, J.
    (2012, December12). Australia’s disaster in education. The Age, p.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Why we are publishing a league table
    Why we are publishing a league table (2010, January29). Sydney Morning Herald, p.14.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilson, A.
    (2013) Embracing Bayes factors for key item analysis in corpus linguistics. InM. Bieswanger & A. Koll-Stobbe (Eds.), New approaches to the study of linguistic variability: Language competence and language awareness in Europe (Vol.4, pp.3–11). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Wu, M.
    (2016) What can national testing data tell us?InB. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment (pp.19–29). Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.19047.moc
Loading
Ten years of print media coverage of NAPLAN
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 43, 117 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19047.moc
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.19047.moc
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.19047.moc
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): corpus-assisted analysis; discourse analysis; NAPLAN

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error