1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The number of ranks required for an adequate discourse analysis may vary between genres and can be explained with reference to the social purpose of that genre. Stages of generic structure were attributed to eight language testing interviews on the basis of apparent interviewer purpose, and this attribution was subsequently justified by the distribution of speech function types and mood choices between them. A problem in analysing the major section of the interview was whether to model it as a group of recurring elements at the level of stage, at the level of exchange, or at an intermediate level. The intermediate level of transaction was adopted, allowing for an model which recognises the common purpose and speech function patterns of the stage but also allows an account of how conversational exchanges group to construct both dialogic and monologic texts with or without the characteristics of other recognisable genres. Such an analysis is especially useful in assessing learners’ ability to engage in extended conversational discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20.1.01per
1997-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akinnaso, F.N. and C. Seabrook Ajirotutu
    (1982) Performance and ethnic style in job interviews. In J.J. Gumperz (ed.) Language and social identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berry, M.
    (1981) Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard and M. Montgomery (eds.) Studies in discourse analysis. London, Boston and Henley, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, C.S.
    (1985) Systemic linguistics: Theory and applications. London, Bats ford Academic and Educational.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Curtin, P.
    (1987) Considerations in measuring speaking proficiency in the second language learner: Another look at the interview. Unpublished MA thesis, Sydney, University of Sydney, Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eggins, S.
    (1994) An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London, Frances Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Halliday, M.A.K.
    (1976) Categories of the theory of grammar. In G.R. Kress (ed.) Halliday: System and function in language. London, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1984) Language as code and language as behaviour: a systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue. In R. Fawcett , M.A.K. Halliday , S.M. Lamb and A. Makkai (eds.) The Semiotics of culture and language, I. London, Frances Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1994) An introduction to functional grammar. Second edition. London, Frances Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan
    (1985) Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, Deakin University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnston, M.
    (1985) Syntactic and morphological progessions in learner English. Canberra, Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Martin, J.R.
    (1992) English text, system and structure. Amsterdam, John Benjamin’s. doi: 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  12. Neeson, S.
    (1985) An exploratory study of the discourse structure of the Australian Second Language Proficiency Ratings test of oral proficiency. Unpublished MA Thesis. Birmingham, University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Perrett, G.H.
    (1990) The language testing interview: A reappraisal. In J.H.A.L. de Jong and D.S. Stevenson (eds.) Individualising the assessment of language abilities. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1991) How do learners answer questions? Discourse and the development of inter language. Unpublished PhD thesis. Sydney, University of Sydney, Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sinclair, J.McH. , and R.M. Coulthard
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sinclair, J.McH. , and D. Brazil
    (1982) Teacher Talk. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wolfson, N.
    (1976) Speech events and natural speech: some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society, 5:189-209. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500007028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007028 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20.1.01per
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error