1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 20, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Overall, learners of Mandarin tend to use overt nouns and pronouns to a greater extent than native speakers (Charters 1996b), but what specifically gives rise to this discrepancy? Differences in the distribution of ellipsis in learner and native speaker texts is investigated: both frequency and discourse contexts of syntactic structures associated with ellipsis are compared. Learners made no errors of ellipsis in structures where ellipsis is grammatically prescribed, nor did they appear to avoid such syntactic structures. In fact, the discrepancy in overall frequencies arises in contexts where ellipsis is optional; it is a consequence not of differing syntactic choices, but of differing pragmatic choices in comparable syntactic contexts. No single syntactic structure emerges as a significant contributor to the different rates of optional ellipsis overall. However, when individual variation is taken into account, it is clear that some learners use ellipsis only in syntactic contexts where it is permissible in English, and most learners use elliptic syntactic structures in a narrower range of discourse contexts than is typical of native speaker use.

© 1997 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20.1.04cha
1997-01-01
2023-12-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.20.1.04cha
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aoun, J.
    (1985) A grammar of anaphora. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Battistella, E.
    (1985) On the distribution of PRO in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory3:317-340. doi: 10.1007/BF00154266
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154266 [Google Scholar]
  3. Besnier, N.
    (1985) The local organisation of zero anaphora in Tuvaluan conversation. Te Reo: Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand28:119-147.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bresnan, J.
    (ed) (1982) The mental representation of grammatical relations. Canbridge, MA, MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Charters, A.H.
    (1996a) A silence more eloquent: NP ellipsis in Mandarin discourse. M.A. Thesis, ANU.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. (1996b) A comparison of learner and native speaker NP ellipsis in Mandarin. Te Reo. Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand39:3-23.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen Ping
    (1984) A discourse analysis of third person zero anaphora in Chinese. Bloomington IA, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chomsky, N.
    (1980) On binding. Linguistic Inquiry11:1-46.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chung, S.
    (1989) On the notion of ‘null anaphor’ in Chamorro. In Jaeggli and Safir (eds).
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Crystal, D.
    (1992) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. (3rd edition) Oxford, Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Espino de Valdivia, I.
    (1989) Universal trends in nominal zero anaphora: An inquiry into Japanese and Spanish discourse. Transactions of the International Conference of Orientalists in Japan34:70-83.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Farmer, A.K. and R.M. Harnish
    (1987) Communicative reference with pronouns. In Verschueren and Bertuccelli-Papa (eds).
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fillmore, C.J.
    (1969) Types of lexical information. In F. Kiefer (ed) Studies in syntax and semantics. Dordrecht, Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑1707‑7_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1707-7_6 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1986) Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Nikiforidou et al. (eds) Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, Berkeley Linguistics Society. doi: 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866 [Google Scholar]
  16. Givon, T.
    (1983) Introduction. In T. Givon (ed) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam, Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1984) Universals of discourse structure and second language acquisition. In W. Rutherford (ed) language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.5.10giv
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.5.10giv [Google Scholar]
  18. Haegeman, L.
    (1991) Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  19. Horrocks, G.
    (1987) Generative grammar. London, Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang, C.T.J.
    (1982) Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD. dissertation. MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15,4:531-44
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (1989) Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalised control theory. In Jaeggli and Safir (eds).
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (1993) Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry24,1:103-138.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang Yan
    (1992) Against Chomsky’s typology of empty categories. Journal of Pragmatics17:1-29. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90026‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90026-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1994) The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554292
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554292 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaeggli, O. and K.J. Safir
    eds The null subject parameter. Dordrecht, Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2540‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Junghare, I.Y.
    (1988) Topic-prominence and zero NP-anaphora in Marathi and Hindi. In M.A. Jazayery and W. Winter (eds) Languages and cultures: Studies in honour of Edgar C Polome. (Trends in Linguistics36) Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110864359.309
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864359.309 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaplan, R.M. and J. Bresnan
    (1982) Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan (ed).
     [Google Scholar]
  29. La Polla, R.
    (1993) Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica. 63,4. Taiwan, Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (1994) Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In M. Noonan and P. Downing (eds) Word order in discourse (Typological Studies in Language30). Amsterdam/Philedelphia, John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lasnik, H.
    (ed) (1989) Essays on anaphora, studies in natural language and linguistic theory. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Levinson, S.C.
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (1987a) Minimisation and conversational inference. In Verschueren and Bertuccelli-Papi (eds).
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (1987b) Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics23:379-434. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011324
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011324 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1991) Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited.Journal of Linguistics27:107-61. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012433
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012433 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, C.N. and S. Thompson
    (1979) Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. In T. Givon (ed) Discourse and syntax. (Syntax and Semantics12) New York and London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lust, B.
    (1986) (ed) Studies in the acquisition of anaphora. 2Vols.Dordrecht, D. Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4548‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4548-7 [Google Scholar]
  38. Manzini, M.R.
    (1983) On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry14:554-561.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Reinhart, T.
    (1976) The syntactic domain of anaphora. Ph.d. dissertation, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. (1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London, Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rizzi, L.
    (1986) Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry17:501-58.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Shopen, T.
    (1972) A generative theory of ellipsis: A consideration of the linguistic use of silence. Reproduced by theIndiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (1973) Ellipsis as grammatical indeterminacy. Foundations of Language10:65-77.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Verschueren, J. and M. Bertuccelli-Papi
    (eds) (1987) The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5 [Google Scholar]
  45. White, L.
    (1985) The ‘pro-drop’ parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning35:47-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1985.tb01014.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01014.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Williams, J.
    (1989) Pronoun copies, pronominal and zero anaphora. In S. Gass et al (eds) Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20.1.04cha
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error