From emergence to acquisition

References

1. Anderson, S.R.
   (1985) Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (ed) Language typology and syntactic description. Vol3. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakalla, M.H.
   (ed) (1980) Proceedings of the first international symposium on teaching Arabic to non-Arabic speakers. Riyadh, University of Riyadh.
3. Barlow, M.
   (1992) A situated theory of agreement. New York, Garland Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney
   (1981) SLA from a functional perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In H. Winitz (ed) Annals of the New York Academy of Science conference on native and foreign language acquisition. New York, New York Academy of Sciences.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney Bates
   (1987) Language universals, individual variation, and the competition model. In B. McWhinney and E. Bates (eds) Mechanisms of language acquisition. New York, Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bever, T.G.
   (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic competence. In T.G. Hayes (ed) Cognition and tlie development of language. New York, Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bybee, J.L.
   (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
8. Bybee, J.L.
   (1991) Natural morphology: the organisation of paradigms and language acquisition. In Huebner and Ferguson (eds).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cazden, C. , E. Cancino , E. Rosansky and J. Schumann
   (1975) Second language acquisition sequences in children, adolescents and adults. Report submitted to theNational Institute of education, Washington D.C.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clahsen, H.
    (1986) Connecting theories of language processing and (second) language acquisition. C.W. Pfaff (ed) First and second language acquisition processes. Cambridge, Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clahsen, H. and P. Muysken
    (1989) The UG paradox and second language acquisition. Second Language Research2:99-119.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cooreman, A. and K. Kilborn
    (1991) Functional linguistics: Discourse structure and language processing in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner and C.A. Ferguson (eds).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Decamp, D.
    (1973) Implicational scales and socio linguistic linearity. Linguistics73:30-43.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dik, S.
    (1978) Functional grammar. Amsterdam, North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fassi Fehri, A.
    (1988) Agreement in Arabic, Binding and coherence. In M. Barlow and C. A. Ferguson (eds) Agreement in natural language. Stanford, CA, CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Givon, T.
    (1979) Discourse and syntax (Syntax and SemanticsNo12) New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Givon, T.
    (1990) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol.2. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gutman, L.
    (1948) A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociolinguistic Review9:139-150. doi: 10.2307/2086306
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2086306 [Google Scholar]
19. Hakuta, K.
    (1976) A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language. Language Learning26,2:321-351. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1976.tb00280.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00280.x [Google Scholar]
20. Huebner T. and C. A. Ferguson
    (eds) (1991) Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.2 [Google Scholar]
21. Klein, W.
    (1991) SLA theory: Prolegomena to a theory of language acquisition and implications for theoretical linguistics. In T. Huebner and C. A. Ferguson (eds).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lapointe, S.G.
    (1984) Toward a unified theory of agreement. Paper presented at theConference on Agreement in Natural Language, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lapointe, S.G.
    (1988.b) Distinguishing types of morphosyntactic co-occurences: mismatch resolution, agreement and government. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol.2Parasession on agreement in grammatical theory. Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Langacker, R.W.
    (1986) Foundations of cognitive grammar topics, in B. Rudaka-Oyston (ed) Cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Larsen-Freeman, D. and M. Long
    (1991) An introduction to second language classroom research. London, Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McCarthy, J and A. Prince
    (1990) Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Eid and McCarthy (eds).
    [Google Scholar]
27. Eid, M. and J. McCarthy
    (eds) (1990) Perspectives on Arabic linguistics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mansouri, F.
    (1995.a) A discourse approach to the acquisition of Arabic S-V agreement by Australian learners. Unpublished M.A thesis. The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mansouri, F.
    (1995.b) The acquisition of Arabic subject-verb agreement by Australian learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics16,2:64-85.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Meisel, J. , H. Clahsen and M. Pienemann
    (1981) On determining developmental stages in natural SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition3,1:109-135. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004137
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004137 [Google Scholar]
31. Mohammad, M.A.
    (1990) The problem of subject-verb agreement in Arabic: Towards a solution, in Eid and McCarthy (eds).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Moutaouakil, A.
    (1985) Topic in Arabic: Towards a functional analysis. In A.M. Bolkestein , C. De Groot and J. L. Mackenzie (eds) Syntax and pragmatics in functional grammar. Foris Publication: Dordrecht-Holland. doi: 10.1515/9783110846362‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846362-008 [Google Scholar]
33. Neel, A.F.
    (1980) Fundamentals of Arabic grammar for non-Arabic Speakers. In Bakalla (ed.).
34. Omar, M.
    (1973) The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague, Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pienemann, M.
    (1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition6,2:186-214. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100005015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005015 [Google Scholar]
36. Pienemann, M and M. Johnston
    (1985) Towards an explanatory model of language acquisition. Paper presented at the1985 Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum, UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pienemann, M.
    (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics10:52-79. doi: 10.1093/applin/10.1.52
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52 [Google Scholar]
38. Pienemann, M.
    (1994) Towards a theory of processability in second language acquisition. Unpublished ms, Australian National University. A more comprehensive edition of this paper is to appear in a forthcoming bookLanguage processing and second language acquisition.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rutherford, W.
    (1983) Language typology and language transfer. In S. Gass and L. Selinker (eds) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA, Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sadock, J.
    (1986) An autolexical view of pronouns, anaphora and agreement. Working Papers on Linguistics, University of Chicago, 2.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Slobin, D.I.
    (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C.A. Ferguson and D.I. Slobin (eds) Studies of child language development. New York, Holt Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Slobin, D.I.
    (ed) (1985) The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, Earlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Van Valin, R.D. , and W.A. Foley
    (1980) Role and reference grammar. In E.A. Moravcsik and J.R. Wirth . (eds) Current approaches to syntax. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]