1887
image of The evidence-based intervention for teaching the Chinese language in Australian classrooms
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There is a lack of research on evidence-based intervention in relation to the issue of L2 variations in secondary schools. This study addresses some conceptual problems of L2, proposing a four-quadrant model of language processes. This model provides a framework to identify students’ L2 developmental stages. With an action research method, the data were collected from 126 Chinese language learners in Australia over a 4-year period (2016–2020). The main instruments were questionnaires, class observations, informal interviews, and student feedback. The findings revealed that most learners were initially motivated to learn the Chinese language in year 9, even if they were at varying stages of L2 development. While several factors were interplayed to affect their language experience, the findings underscored the implementation of a range of plausible interventions. The effectiveness of the intervention was measured by student engagement, and further backed by the retention rates of year 12 students. This study provides a beginning to the evidence base, necessary to design Chinese language interventions in Australia.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20022.yan
2020-09-24
2020-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aflalo, E.
    (2018) Students generating questions as a way of learning. Active Learning in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:  10.1177/1469787418769120
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418769120 [Google Scholar]
  2. Apel, K., Henbest, V. S., & Masterson, J.
    (2019) Orthographic knowledge: Clarifications, challenges, and future directions. Reading and Writing, 32(4), 873–889. 10.1007/s11145‑018‑9895‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9895-9 [Google Scholar]
  3. Appel, R.
    (2019) Immigrant children learning Dutch: Sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic aspects of second-language acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Banerji, M., & Dailey, R. A.
    (1995) A study of the effects of an inclusion model on students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(8), 511–522. 10.1177/002221949502800806
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949502800806 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrett, M.
    (Ed.) (1999) The development of language. London: Psychology.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergold, J., & Thomas, S.
    (2012) Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Qualitative Social Research, 13(4), 191–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berman, J., & Graham, L.
    (2018) Learning intervention: Educational casework and responsive teaching for sustainable learning. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203711675
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203711675 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F.
    (1982) Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Byram, M.
    (1996) Framing the experience of residence abroad: The pedagogical function of the informal interview. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 9(1), 84–98. 10.1080/07908319609525220
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908319609525220 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cahill, S. M.
    (2009) Where does handwriting fit in? Strategies to support academic achievement. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(4), 223–228. 10.1177/1053451208328826
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208328826 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cammarata, L.
    (2016) Foreign language education and the development of inquiry-driven language programs: Key challenges and curricular planning strategies. InL. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching (pp.137–160). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203850497
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850497 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carreira, M.
    (2016) A general framework and supporting strategies for teaching mixed classes. Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language, 49, 159–176. 10.1075/sibil.49.09car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.49.09car [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, H. C., Hsu, C. C., Chang, L. Y., Lin, Y. C., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T.
    (2013) Using a radical-derived character e-learning platform to increase learner knowledge of Chinese characters. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 89–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, H., & Nordstrom, J.
    (2018) Teaching young second language learners in LOTE contexts. InR. Oliver & B. Nguyen (Eds.), Teaching young second language learners (pp.109–126). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315149813‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315149813-6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J.
    (2019) Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351033268
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033268 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K.
    (2013) Research methods in education. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203720967
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720967 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook, V.
    (2016) Second language learning and language teaching. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315883113
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883113 [Google Scholar]
  18. Davies, N. F.
    (2011) Receptive versus productive skills in foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 60(8), 440–443. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1976.tb03667.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1976.tb03667.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Dörnyei, Z.
    (1994) Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02042.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02042.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Dreyfus, S.
    (2004) The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 177–181. 10.1177/0270467604264992
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992 [Google Scholar]
  21. Du, X., Zhao, K., Ruan, Y., Wang, L., & Duan, X.
    (2017) Beginner CFL learners’ perceptions of language difficulty in a task-based teaching and learning (TBTL) environment in Denmark. System, 69, 108–120. 10.1016/j.system.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Elder, C.
    (2000) Outing the native speaker: The problem of diverse learner backgrounds in ‘foreign’ language classrooms – an Australian case study. Language Culture & Curriculum, 13(1), 86–108. 10.1080/07908310008666591
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666591 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellis, R.
    (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Finnan, C.
    (2018) Accelerating the learning of all students: Cultivating culture change in schools, classrooms and individuals. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429502576
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429502576 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ford, O.
    (2017) Streaming of classes, social comparison, and students self-concept. Journal of Initial Teacher Inquiry, 3, 32–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gauthier, K., & Genesee, F.
    (2011) Language development in internationally adopted children: A special case of early second language learning. Child Development, 82(3), 887–901. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2011.01578.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01578.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Good, T. L.
    (1988) Observational research… grounding theory in classrooms. Educational Psychologist, 23(4), 375–379. 10.1207/s15326985ep2304_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2304_5 [Google Scholar]
  28. Grebennikov, L., & Shah, M.
    (2013) Student voice: Using qualitative feedback from students to enhance their university experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 606–618. 10.1080/13562517.2013.774353
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774353 [Google Scholar]
  29. Green, K.
    (2018) Using more native-like language acquisition processes in the foreign language classroom. Cogent Education, 5(1), 14291341. 10.1080/2331186X.2018.1429134
    https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1429134 [Google Scholar]
  30. Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M.
    (2007) Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781412984614
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984614 [Google Scholar]
  31. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (2014) Notes on teaching Chinese to foreign learners. Journal of World Languages, 1(1), 1–6. 10.1080/21698252.2014.893675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2014.893675 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hammarberg, B.
    (2014) Problems in defining the concepts of L1, L2 and L3. InA. Otwinowska & G. De Angelis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in multilingual contexts: Sociolinguistic and educational perspectives (pp.3–18). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783091263‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091263-003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hand, L., & Rowe, M.
    (2001) Evaluation of student feedback. Accounting Education, 10(2), 147–160. 10.1080/09639280110081651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280110081651 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hanks, J.
    (2017) Exploratory practice in language teaching: Puzzling about principles and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑45344‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45344-0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hattie, J.
    (2012) Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203181522
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522 [Google Scholar]
  36. Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L.
    (2015) The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hsiao, H. S., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. Y., Chen, B., Wu, C. H., & Lin, C. Y.
    (2016) The development and evaluation of listening and speaking diagnosis and remedial teaching system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 372–389. 10.1111/bjet.12237
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12237 [Google Scholar]
  38. Infante, P., & Poehner, M.
    (2019) Realizing the ZPD in second language education. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6(1), 63–91. 10.1558/lst.38916
    https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.38916 [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnston, O., & Wildy, H.
    (2016) The effects of streaming in the secondary school on learning outcomes for Australian students: A review of the international literature. Australian Journal of Education, 60(1), 42–59. 10.1177/0004944115626522
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115626522 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kane, R. G. & Maw, N.
    (2005) Making sense of learning at secondary school: Involving students to improve teaching practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 311–322. 10.1080/03057640500319024
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500319024 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ke, S., & Chan, S. D.
    (2017) Strategy use in L2 Chinese reading: The effect of L1 background and L2 proficiency. System, 66, 27–38. 10.1016/j.system.2017.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kibler, A.
    (2017) Peer interaction and learning in multilingual settings from a sociocultural perspective: Theoretical insights. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(3), 199–203. 10.1080/19313152.2017.1328970
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2017.1328970 [Google Scholar]
  43. Köpke, B., & Genevska-Hanke, D.
    (2018) First language attrition and dominance: Same same or different?Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1963. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01963
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01963 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kleinsasser, R. C.
    (2001) Primary to secondary LOTE articulation: A local case in Australia. Foreign Language Annals, 34(3), 193–205. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2001.tb02401.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02401.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Krashen, S. D.
    (1992) The input hypothesis: An update. InJ. E. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp.409–431). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D.
    (1983) The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S.
    (2017) Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680. 10.1177/1362168816683559
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559 [Google Scholar]
  48. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Freeman, D.
    (2008) Language moves: The place of “foreign” languages in classroom teaching and learning. Review of Research in Education, 32, 147–186. 10.3102/0091732X07309426
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309426 [Google Scholar]
  49. Larson, A. L., Cycyk, L. M., Carta, J. J., Hammer, C. S., Baralt, M., Uchikoshi, Y., An, Z. G., & Wood, C.
    (2020) A systematic review of language-focused interventions for young children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 157–178. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Leaver, B. L., Ehrman, M., & Shekhtman, B.
    (2005) Achieving success in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610431
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610431 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lenneberg, E. H.
    (1967) Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley. 10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mackenzie, N. M., & Spokes, R.
    (2018) Handwriting, keyboarding or both?InN. M. Mackenzie & J. Scull (Eds.), Understanding and supporting young writers from birth to 8 (pp.137–164). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McConachy, T.
    (2018) Critically engaging with cultural representations in foreign language textbooks. Intercultural Education, 29(1), 77–88. 10.1080/14675986.2017.1404783
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2017.1404783 [Google Scholar]
  54. McMillan, J. H.
    (2012) Educational research: fundamentals for the consumer (6th ed.). New York: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Möllering, M.
    (2014) Australian language policy and the design of a national curriculum for languages. InP. Grommes & A. Hu (Eds.), Plurilingual education: Policies–practice–language development (pp.55–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Neilsen, R.
    (2016) The development of knowledge about language in teacher training: What works?InI. H. Mirici, I. H. Erten, H. Oz, & I. Vodopija-Krstanovic (Eds.), Research papers on teaching English as an additional language (pp.137–149). Rijeka, Croatia: University of Rijeka.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Nicholas, H.
    (2015) Losing bilingualism while promoting second language acquisition in Australian language policy. InJ. Hajek & Y. Slaughter (Eds.), Challenging the monolingual mindset (pp.165–181). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. O’Hara, M.
    (2003) Cultivating consciousness: Carl R. Rogers’s person-centered group process as transformative andragogy. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 64–79. 10.1177/0095399703251646
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703251646 [Google Scholar]
  59. Packard, J. L., Chen, X., Li, W., Wu, X., Gaffney, J. S., Li, H., & Anderson, R. C.
    (2006) Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 457–487. 10.1007/s11145‑006‑9003‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9003-4 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pienemann, M.
    (1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pine, G. J.
    (2009) Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O.
    (2007) Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00022.x [Google Scholar]
  63. Punch, K.
    (2005) Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. New York: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B.
    (2011) Developing self-regulated skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194–218. 10.1177/1932202X1102200202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200202 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ramírez, N., Lieberman, A., & Mayberry, R.
    (2013) The initial stages of first-language acquisition begun in adolescence: When late looks early. Journal of Child Language, 40(2), 391–414. 10.1017/S0305000911000535
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000535 [Google Scholar]
  66. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H.
    (2008) (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848607934
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934 [Google Scholar]
  67. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J.
    (2004) Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and emotion, 28(2), 147–169. 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f [Google Scholar]
  68. Reid, J. M.
    (1987) The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL quarterly, 21(1), 87–111. 10.2307/3586356
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586356 [Google Scholar]
  69. Reinders, H.
    (2010) Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 40–55. 10.14221/ajte.2010v35n5.4
    https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n5.4 [Google Scholar]
  70. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R.
    (2002) Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Richardson, V.
    (1994) Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10. 10.3102/0013189X023005005
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023005005 [Google Scholar]
  72. Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2018) Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315661001
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661001 [Google Scholar]
  73. Romaine, S.
    (1999) Bilingual language development. InM. Barrett (Ed.), The development of language (251–271). London: Psychology.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Sakui, K., & Gaies, S. J.
    (1999) Investigating Japanese learners’ beliefs about language learning. System, 27(4), 473–492. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00046‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00046-9 [Google Scholar]
  75. Scrimgeour, A.
    (2012) Understanding the nature of performance: The influence of learner background on school-age learner achievement in Chinese. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 312–338. 10.1075/aral.35.3.05scr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.35.3.05scr [Google Scholar]
  76. Skehan, P.
    (1991) Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in second language acquisition, 13(2), 275–298. 10.1017/S0272263100009979
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009979 [Google Scholar]
  77. Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T.
    (2005) Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(24), 8781–8785. 10.1073/pnas.0503523102
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503523102 [Google Scholar]
  78. van der Lans, R. M., van de Grift, W. J., & Van Veen, K.
    (2018) Developing an instrument for teacher feedback: Using the Rasch model to explore teachers’ development of effective teaching strategies and behaviors. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(2), 247–264. 10.1080/00220973.2016.1268086
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268086 [Google Scholar]
  79. VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G.
    (2010) Key terms in second language acquisition. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Vukelich, C., Enz, B., Roskos, K. A., & Kristie, J.
    (2019) Helping young children learn language and literacy: Birth through kindergarten (4th ed.). New York: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Walker, R.
    (2017) Naturalistic research. InJ. Arthur (Ed.), Research methods and methodologies in Education (pp.78–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang, W., & Ruan, J.
    (2016) Historical overview of Chinese language education for speakers of other languages in China and the United States. InJ. Ruan, J. Zhang, & C. B. Leung (Eds.), Chinese language education in the United States (pp.1–28). New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21308‑8_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21308-8_1 [Google Scholar]
  83. Waxman, H. C., Tharp, R. G., & Hilberg, R. S.
    (Eds.) (2004) Observational research in US classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and linguistic diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616419
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616419 [Google Scholar]
  84. Yeung, P. S., Ho, C. S. H., Wong, Y. K., Chan, D. W. O., Chung, K. K. H., & Lo, L. Y.
    (2013) Longitudinal predictors of Chinese word reading and spelling among elementary grade students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1245–1277. 10.1017/S0142716412000239
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000239 [Google Scholar]
  85. Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P.
    (2016) The effects of an online student-constructed test strategy on knowledge construction. Computers & Education, 94, 89–101. 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  86. Zarrinabadi, N., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M.
    (2019) Directed motivational currents in L2 (pp.33–47). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑05472‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05472-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhang, Q. G., & Gong, Q.
    (2014) The retention of year 11/12 Chinese in Australian schools: A relevance theory perspective. InK. Dunworth & G. Zhang (Eds.), Critical perspectives on language education (pp.119–140). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20022.yan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20022.yan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error