1887
image of Input–output relation in second language acquisition

Abstract

Abstract

Studies on the role of input in L2 acquisition often estimate L2 input properties through L1 corpora and focus on L2-English. This study probes the initial stage of L2-Korean learning for adult English-speaking beginners of Korean to investigate input-output relations in the acquisition of L2 that is typologically different from English in a more direct manner. We specifically ask how L2 beginner input affects L2 beginner production with respect to Korean postpositions. For this purpose, we investigate how the beginners receive input regarding Korean postpositions from a textbook and to what extent the input characteristics are manifested in learner writing. We found that, whereas the presentation of certain postpositions in the textbook was generally reflected in learner writing, individual postpositions showed disparity in their use between the textbook and the writing. Implications of the findings are discussed in light of L1-L2 differences and how the textbook presents form-function pairings of these postpositions.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20049.shi
2021-01-21
2021-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/aral.20049.shi/aral.20049.shi.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20049.shi&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abbot-Smith, K., & Tomasello, M.
    (2006) Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 275–290. doi:  10.1515/TLR.2006.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, L. G.
    (1980) A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15(3), 147–149. doi:  10.3758/BF03334492
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334492 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alsaif, A., & Milton, J.
    (2012) Vocabulary input from school textbooks as a potential contributor to the small uptake gained by English as a foreign language learners in Saudi Arabia. The Language Learning Journal, 40(1), 21–33. doi:  10.1080/09571736.2012.658221
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.658221 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L.
    (2015) The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239–273. doi:  10.1017/S030500091400049X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091400049X [Google Scholar]
  5. Behrens, H.
    (2009) Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2), 383–411. doi:  10.1515/LING.2009.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao, F., Sussman, B. L., Rios, V., Yan, X., Wang, Z., Spray, G. J., & Mack, R. M.
    (2017) Different mechanisms in learning different second languages: Evidence from English speakers learning Chinese and Spanish. NeuroImage, 148, 284–295. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.042
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.042 [Google Scholar]
  7. Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2005) Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6), 500–508. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2005.00441.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00441.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Cho, I. J.
    (2006) Comparative linguistic analysis of subject and object case marking errors by English speaking learners of Korean. Journal of Korean Language Education, 17(3), 281–299.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Choo, M., & Kwak, H. Y.
    (2008) Using Korean. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139168496
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168496 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chu, K-H.
    (2009) Hankwuke mwunpep kyoyuklon: Cosalul taysangulo [Korean grammar education: Regarding particles]. Pakiceng.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A.
    (2015) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 524–542. doi:  10.1017/S1366728914000200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000200 [Google Scholar]
  12. Davis, M., & Face, T.
    (2006) Vocabulary coverage in Spanish textbooks: How representatives is it?InN. Sagarra & A. J. Toribio (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.132–143). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dąbrowska, E.
    (2008) The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 931–951. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  14. Desagulier, G.
    (2016) A lesson from associative learning: Asymmetry and productivity in multiple-slot constructions. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 12(2), 173–219. doi:  10.1515/cllt‑2015‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. doi:  10.1017/S0272263102002024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
    (2009a) Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–385. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00896.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x [Google Scholar]
  17. (2009b) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 188–221. doi:  10.1075/arcl.7.08ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.08ell [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U.
    (2015) Usage-based language learning. InB. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp.163–180). John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Frenck-Mestre, C., Kim, S. K., Choo, H., Ghio, A., Herschensohn, J., & Koh, S.
    (2019) Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(3), 385–404. doi:  10.1080/23273798.2018.1549332
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1549332 [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2019) Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
    (2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 289–316. doi:  10.1515/cogl.2004.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ha, K., & Choi, S.
    (2012) Adult second language learners’ acquisition of word order and case markers in Korean. Korean Language in America, 17, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, S-M.
    (2014) An analysis of errors on the usage of particles in the discussions of advanced Korean language learners. Bilingual Research, 57, 223–255. doi:  10.17296/korbil.2014..57.223
    https://doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2014..57.223 [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, S. H., & Won, M. J.
    (2017) Analysis of distribution and selection factor of ‘un/nun’ and ‘i/ka’ in the native speaker corpus and the Korean learner’s corpus. Enesasilkwa kwancem [Language Facts and Perspectives], 41, 49–83. doi:  10.20988/lfp.2017.41..49
    https://doi.org/10.20988/lfp.2017.41..49 [Google Scholar]
  25. Han, Z., Park, E. S., & Combs, C.
    (2008) Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 597–618. doi:  10.1093/applin/amn010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn010 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hilpert, M., & Diessel, H.
    (2017) Entrenchment in Construction Grammar. InH.-J. Schmid (Eds.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp.57–74). Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X.
    (2011) Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00627.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Jung, B. K.
    (2020) Verb use for the locative functions of three adverbial postpositions (-ey, -eyse, and -(u)lo) in Korean: Analysis of L1-Korean corpora and L2-Korean textbooks (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai‘i.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kang, B. M., & Kim, H. G.
    (2009) Hankwuke sayong pindo [Usage frequency of Korean language]. Hankwuk Mwunhwsa.
  30. Kim, J.-E.
    (2004) The Japanese learners misuse aspect for Korean particles. Journal of Korean Language Education, 15(1), 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015) Analysis on interrelation between error of particles by learners of Korean language and education contents. Journal of Korean Language Education, 26(4), 1–38. doi:  10.18209/iakle.2015.26.4.1
    https://doi.org/10.18209/iakle.2015.26.4.1 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, M.-J.
    (2013) Analysis of error of particles in Korean language among Chinese students in Korea. Yengcuemwun [Yeongju Literacy Society], 26, 61–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, Y.
    (1999) The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5/6), 687–714. doi:  10.1080/016909699386239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386239 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2016) A study on the semantic function and situational model of ‘eun/neun’ and ‘yi/ga’: Focusing on basic level learners. Language & Information Society, 28, 59–107. 10.29211/soli.2016.28..003
    https://doi.org/10.29211/soli.2016.28..003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim, Y.-J., & Guo, J.
    (2016) A study on the acquisition of Korean adverbial case marker ey in spoken production by Chinese Korean L2 learners. Kwukekyoyukyenkwu [Korean Education Research], 38, 1–26. doi:  10.17313/jkorle.2016..38.1
    https://doi.org/10.17313/jkorle.2016..38.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ko, S.-J.
    (2004) Hyentay Hankwuke cosauy yenkwu I [Research on modern Korean particles]. Hankwukmwunhwasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ko, S.-J., Kim, M. O., Kim, J., Seo, S-G., Jung, H-J., & Han, S. H.
    (2004) ‘Hankwuke haksupca’ malmwungchiwa olyu pwunsek [‘Korean learners’ corpus and error analysis]. Hankwukmwunhwasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ko, Y. K., & Kwu, P-K.
    (2008) Wulimal mwunpeplon [The Korean grammar]. Cipmwuntang.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kyle, K.
    (2016) Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S.
    (2017) Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing, 34(4), 513–535. doi:  10.1177/0265532217712554
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217712554 [Google Scholar]
  41. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol.1). Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee, C.-K., & Ko, Y-J.
    (2013) Hankwuke kokup haksupcauy cosa ‘ey’ey tayhan insikkwa sayong yangsang yenkwu [The degree of advanced Korean learners’ recognition of postposition]. Emwunnoncip [The Journal of Language & Literature], 56, 485–511.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee, J.
    (2012) Analyzing errors in the use of particles by Japanese learners of Korean – For students of University of Shimane. Bilingual Research, 49, 299–319. Retrieved onNovember 14, 2018, from doi:  10.17296/korbil.2012..49.299
    https://doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2012..49.299 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, Y.
    (2012) A study on the development of Korean grammar textbooks for English-speaking learners based on an analysis of textbooks and learners’ needs. Journal of Korean Language Education, 23(3), 289–314. doi:  10.18209/iakle.2012.23.3.289
    https://doi.org/10.18209/iakle.2012.23.3.289 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee-Ellis, S.
    (2009) The development and validation of a Korean C-Test using Rasch Analysis. Language Testing, 26(2), 245–274. doi:  10.1177/0265532208101007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208101007 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A.
    (2010) Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 447–464. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, C. N., & Thomson, S. A.
    (1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language. InC. N. Li (Eds.), Subject and topic (pp.457–489). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Madlener, K.
    (2015) Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition (Vol.29). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. 10.1515/9783110405538
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110405538 [Google Scholar]
  49. McDonough, K., & Kim, Y.
    (2009) Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 386–398. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00897.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00897.x [Google Scholar]
  50. McDonough, K., & Nekrasova-Becker, T.
    (2014) Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(2), 419–442. doi:  10.1017/S0142716412000446
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000446 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nakamura, D.
    (2012) Input skewedness, consistency, and order of frequent verbs in frequency-driven second language construction learning: A replication and extension of Casenhiser and Goldberg (2005) to adult second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50(1), 1–37. Retrieved on December 21, 2018, from doi: 10.1515/iral‑2012‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2012-0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Oh, A., & Park, S. H.
    (2016) Chinese L2 acquisition of Korean particle i/ka and eun/nun. Enesasilkwa kwancem, 39, 221–247. doi:  10.20988/lfp.2016.39..221
    https://doi.org/10.20988/lfp.2016.39..221 [Google Scholar]
  53. Römer, U.
    (2004) Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. InG. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Steward (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp.151–168). John Benjamins Pub. 10.1075/scl.17.12rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.17.12rom [Google Scholar]
  54. Shin, G.-H., & Jung, B. K.
    (in press). Automatic analysis of learner corpora in Korean: Written production of Korean passive constructions for Mandarin-speaking learners of Korean. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, M. S.
    (1991) Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin (Utrecht), 7(2), 118–132. doi:  10.1177/026765839100700204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700204 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sohn, H. M.
    (1999) The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2011) Constructional preemption by contextual mismatch: A corpus-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 107–129. doi:  10.1515/cogl.2011.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.005 [Google Scholar]
  58. Straka, M., & Straková, J.
    (2017) Tokenizing, POS Tagging, lemmatizing and parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe. InJ. Hajič & D. Zeman (Eds.), Proceedings of the CoNLL 2017 “Shared task: Multilingual parsing from raw text to universal dependencies” (pp.88–99). Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:  10.18653/v1/K17‑3009
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K17-3009 [Google Scholar]
  59. Theakston, A. L.
    (2004) The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgment tasks. Cognitive Development, 19(1), 15–34. doi:  10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Türker, E.
    (2005) Locative expressions in Korean and Turkish: A cognitive grammar approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Year, J., & Gordon, P.
    (2009) Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 399–417. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00898.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00898.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20049.shi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20049.shi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error