1887
image of Pseudo-compliance or convergence?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper reports on a professional learning (PL) project conducted over one year at a senior secondary school in New Zealand. Subject teachers volunteered to work with one another and a facilitator to identify the linguistic demands of their subjects, adapt teaching materials, and try out teaching approaches congruent with research evidence about teaching emergent bilingual (EB) learners. This paper explores cases of subject-specific partnerships and how participants’ responses to the PL appeared to impact their existing pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The PL sessions were facilitated through audio-recorded Zoom meetings. A thematic analysis was conducted, and the findings were analysed using an adaptation of framework to map how participants engaged with the PL and collaborated with one another on new pedagogies. The study suggests that these teachers accommodated linguistic teaching approaches, but their adaptation to language PCK may have remained at a compliant level.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20103.gle
2022-01-06
2022-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abell, S. K.
    (2008) Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1405–1416. doi:  10.1080/09500690802187041
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041 [Google Scholar]
  2. Birt, L. , Scott, S. , Cavers, D. , Campbell, C. , & Walter, F.
    (2016) Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?Qualitative Health Research, 26 (13), 1802–1811. doi:  10.1177/1049732316654870
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunch, G. C.
    (2013) Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37 , 298–341. doi:  10.3102/0091732X12461772
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772 [Google Scholar]
  4. Davison, C.
    (2006) Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 9 (4), 454–475. doi:  10.2167/beb339.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb339.0 [Google Scholar]
  5. Faltis, C. J. , & Valdés, G.
    (2016) Preparing teachers for teaching in and advocating for linguistically diverse classrooms: A vade mecum for teacher educators. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp.549–592). American Educational Research Association. 10.3102/978‑0‑935302‑48‑6_8
    https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6_8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Fang, Z. , & Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2010) Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53 (7), 587–597. doi:  10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6
    https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Farrell, T. S. C.
    (2020) Professional development through reflective practice for English-medium instruction (EMI) teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23 (3), 277–286. doi:  10.1080/13670050.2019.1612840
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1612840 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gleeson, M.
    (2015) ‘It’s the nature of the subject’: Secondary teachers’ disciplinary beliefs and decisions about teaching academic language in their content classes. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38 (2), 104–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammond, J.
    (2006) High challenge, high support: Integrating language and content instruction for diverse learners in an English literature classroom. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (4), 269–283. doi:  10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kibler, A. K. , Walqui, A. , & Bunch, G. C.
    (2015) Transformational opportunities: Language and literacy instruction for English language learners in the common core era in the United States. TESOL Journal, 6 (1), 9–35. doi:  10.1002/tesj.133
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.133 [Google Scholar]
  11. Love, K.
    (2009) Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across disciplines. Language and Education, 23 (6), 541–560. 10.1080/09500780902822942
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902822942 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lyster, R. , & Ballinger, S.
    (2011) Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language teaching Research, 15 (3), 279–288. doi:  10.1177/1362168811401150
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401150 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education. (n.d.). ESOL online. Retrieved from: https://esolonline.tki.org.nz/
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ministry of Education, Unitech in Schools, TEAM Solutions, & Visual Learning (Producer)
    Ministry of Education, Unitech in Schools, TEAM Solutions, & Visual Learning (Producer) (2007) Making language and learning work. Retrieved from: https://esolonline.tki.org.nz/ESOL-Online/Planning-for-my-students-needs/Professional-support-for-teachers-and-teacher-aides/Making-language-and-learning-work
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Molle, D.
    (2021) Content-Area teachers’ appropriation of language development practices during professional learning. TESOL Quarterly, 55 (2), 486–509. doi:  10.1002/tesq.610
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.610 [Google Scholar]
  16. Saldaña, J.
    (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schleppegrell, M.
    (2018) The knowledge base for language teaching: What is the English to be taught as content?Language Teaching Research, 24 (1), 17–27. doi:  10.1177/1362168818777519
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818777519 [Google Scholar]
  18. Shenton, A. K.
    (2004) Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22 (2), 63–75. doi:  10.3233/EFI‑2004‑22201
    https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201 [Google Scholar]
  19. Starman, A. B.
    (2013) The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Pedagogika, 64 (1), 28–43
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Shulman, L. S.
    (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 51 (1), 1–23. 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar]
  21. Turkan, S. , de Oliveira, L. , Lee, O. , & Phelps, G.
    (2014) Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116 (1), 1–30. 10.1177/016146811411600303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600303 [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Driel, J. H. , & Berry, A.
    (2012) Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational researcher, 41 (1), 26–28. doi:  10.3102/0013189X11431010
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20103.gle
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.20103.gle
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error