Animals, embryos, thinkers and doers

References

1. Baron, D.
   (1986) Grammar and Gender. Yale University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bryant, P.
   (1980) Australian questioning intonation: as addition to speaker’s response-seeking repertoire. BA Hons Thesis, ANU Australia.
3. Coates, J.
   (1986) Women, men and language. London, Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Coates, J. and D. Cameron
   (eds) (1988) Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. London, Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cameron, D.
   (1990) The feminist critique of language: A reader. New York, Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fillmore, C.
   (1975) An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society1:123–131.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hall, K. and M. Bucholtz
   (eds) (1995) Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York, Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hines, C.
   (1994) What’s so easy about pie?: The lexicalization of a metaphor. In A. Goldberg (ed.) Conceptual structure, Discourse and language. Cambridge, CUP.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Holmes, J.
   (1986) Functions of you know in women’s and men’s speech. Language in Society15,1:1–22.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Holmes, J.
    (1989) Sort of in New Zealand women’s and men’s speech. Studia Linguistica42,2:85–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1988.tb00788.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1988.tb00788.x [Google Scholar]
11. Horvath, B.
    (1985) Variation in Australian English: the sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge, CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
13. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
14. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson
    (ms.) Philosophy in the flesh: How the embodied mind creates philosophy.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Langacker, R.
    (1986/1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Luchjenbroers, J.
    (1995) Cognitive linguistics and gender representation. HKPU: Working Papers in ELT and Applied Linguistics1,1:73–104.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ortony, A.
    (ed.) (1979) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, CUP.
19. Pauwels, A.
    (ed.) (1987) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Mosman, Australian Professional Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Radtke, H.L. and H.J. Stam
    (eds) (1994) Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Shnukal, A.
    (1982) You’re getting somethink for nothing: Two phonological variables of Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics2,2:197–212.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Stirling, L.
    (1987) Language and gender in Australian Newspapers. In A. Pauwels (ed.) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Mosman, Australian Professional Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sweetser, E.
    (1991) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge, CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Talmy, L.
    (1983) How language structures space. Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No. 4. Cognitive Science Dept., UC Berkeley. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11
25. Tannen, D.
    (1993) Gender and conversational interaction. New York, OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Tannen, D.
    (1994) Gender and discourse. New York, OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Thorne, B. , C. Kramarae , and N. Henley
    (eds) (1983) Language, gender and society. New York, Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]