1887
Volume 45, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Funeral and mourning rites capture so many aspects of the Iranian traditional and religious rituals and provide members of society with cultural tools of lamenting the dead. The study presents socio-cultural considerations in connection with social space and action, linguistic interactions, and semiotic resources of rituals used in mourning ceremonies for Shiite Muslims in the city of Nur, Iran. The paper relies on a mediated discourse analysis approach as a theoretical framework from which to develop a semiotic analysis of the linguistic practices and mediational means that appear in the mourning events. To this end, I shall draw upon video and audio recorded interactions of mourning rituals personally collected at funerals. The paper demonstrates that while mourning rituals are culturally and religiously framed in Shiite Muslims, one must also include the social space, the discourse cycle, the trajectories of the material resource of individual’s historical bodies and of text.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21034.iza
2022-05-16
2024-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, A.
    (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Zidjaly, N.
    (2019) Digital activism as nexus analysis: A sociolinguistic example from Arabic Twitter. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, paper 221. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/digital-activism-as-nexus-analysis-a-sociolinguistic-example-from
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M.
    (1981) The dialogic imagination. University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, J.
    (2005) Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2010) The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2015) Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 105–116. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102214‑014035
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014035 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2019) Commentary: Chronotopes, synchronization and formats. Language & Communication, 70, 132–135. 10.1016/j.langcom.2019.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Canagarajah, S.
    (2017) The Routledge handbook of migration and language. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315754512
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coupland, N.
    (2010) Introduction: Sociolinguistics in the global era. InN. Coupland (Ed.), Handbook of language and globalization (pp.1–27). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444324068.ch
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068.ch [Google Scholar]
  10. Creese, A., & Blackledge, A.
    (2019) Translanguaging and public service encounters: Language learning in the library. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 800–814. 10.1111/modl.12601
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12601 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S.
    (2018) Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on- and offline. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑61955‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61955-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Durkheim, E.
    (1915/1965) The elementary forms of the religious life. The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gardner, K.
    (1998) Death, burial and bereavement amongst Bengali Muslims in Tower Hamlets, East London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(3), 507–521. 10.1080/1369183X.1998.9976647
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.1998.9976647 [Google Scholar]
  14. Garfinkel, H.
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1988) Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential quiddity of immortal ordinary society (I of IV): An announcement of studies. Sociological theory, 6(1), 103–109. 10.2307/201918
    https://doi.org/10.2307/201918 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goebel, Z., Cole, D., & Manns, H.
    (2020) Theorizing the semiotic complexity of contact talk: Contact registers and scalar shifters. InZ. Goebel, D. Cole, & H. Manns (Eds.), Contact talk: The discursive organization of contact and boundaries (pp.1–28). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, E.
    (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1964) The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 133–136. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090 [Google Scholar]
  19. (1971) Relations in public. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1981) Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Good Delvecchio, M.-J., & Good, B. l.
    (1988) Ritual, the state and the transformation of emotional discourse in Iranian society. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 12, 43–53. 10.1007/BF00047038
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047038 [Google Scholar]
  23. Heller, M., Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
    (2014) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and tourism–mobilities, markets, multilingualism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 425–458. 10.1111/josl.12091
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12091 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hester, S., & Francis, D.
    (1994) Doing data: The local organization of a sociological interview. The British Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 675–695. 10.2307/591889
    https://doi.org/10.2307/591889 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hult, F.
    (2017) Nexus analysis as scalar ethnography for educational linguistics. InM. Martine-Jones & D. Martin (Eds.), Researching multilingualism: Critical ethnography perspectives (pp.89–104). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Iedema, R.
    (2003) Multimodality, resemiotisation: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. 10.1177/1470357203002001751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 [Google Scholar]
  27. Izadi, D.
    (2017) Semiotic resources and mediational tools in Merrylands, Sydney, Australia: The case of Persian and Afghan shops. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 495–512. 10.1080/10350330.2017.1334401
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334401 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2020) The spatial and temporal dimensions of interactions: A case study of an ethnic grocery shop. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑19584‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19584-7 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jacquemet, M.
    (2005) Transidiomatic practices, language and power in the age of globalization. Language & Communication, 25(3), 257–277. 10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaworski, A.
    (2014) Mobile language in mobile places. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 524–533. 10.1177/1367006913484207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484207 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jones, R.
    (2010) Cyberspace and physical space attention structures in computer-mediated communication. InA. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp.151–167). Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones, R. H.
    (2014) Mediated discourse analysis. InS. Norris & C. D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, images and texts: A reader in multimodality (pp.39–51). De Gruyter, Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511175.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511175.39 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2016) Spoken discourse. Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350012172
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350012172 [Google Scholar]
  34. Khosronejad, P.
    (2015) Gageriveh, Bakhtiari women’s lamentations: Between self-suffering and tribal identity. InP. Khosronejad (Ed.), Women’s rituals and ceremonies in Shiite Iran and Muslim communities: Methodological and theoretical challenges (pp.41–61). LIT Verlag Münster.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lefebvre, H.
    (1974) The production of space. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Metcalf, P., & Huntington, R.
    (Eds.) (1991) Celebrations of death: The anthropology of mortuary ritual. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803178 [Google Scholar]
  37. Norris, S.
    (2004) Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203379493
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379493 [Google Scholar]
  38. Norris, S., & Jones, R. H.
    (Eds.) (2005) Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Parvaresh, V.
    (2017) Panegyrists, vagueness and the pragmeme. InV. Parvaresh & A. Capone (Eds.), The pragmeme of accommodation: The case of interaction around the event of death (pp.61–81). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pennycook, A.
    (2010) Language as a local practice. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203846223
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846223 [Google Scholar]
  41. Procházka, O., & Blommaert, J.
    (2021) Ergoic framing in New Right online groups: Q, the MAGA kid, and the deep state theory. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 44(1), 4–36. 10.1075/aral.19033.pro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19033.pro [Google Scholar]
  42. Rosaldo, R.
    (2005) Grief and a headhunter’s rage. InA. Robben (Ed.), Death, mourning, and burial: A cross-cultural reader (pp.167–179). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Scollon, R.
    (2001a) Action and text: Towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action. InR. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp.139–183). SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2001b) Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2005) The discourses of food in the world system: Toward a nexus analysis of a world problem. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(3), 465–488. 10.1075/jlp.4.3.07sco
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.3.07sco [Google Scholar]
  46. (2008) Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemiotization. InV. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp.233–244). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.
    (2003) Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  48. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
    (2004) Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203694343
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343 [Google Scholar]
  49. Serwe, S. K.
    (2020) Investigating language use in immigrant businesses: Workplace practices of a Thai massage salon owner in Germany. InK. Goncalves & H. Kelly-Holmes (Eds.), Language, global mobilities, blue-collar workers and blue-collar workplaces (pp.107–127). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429298622‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298622-6 [Google Scholar]
  50. Silverstein, M., & Urban, G.
    (1996) Natural histories of discourse. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Soja, E. W.
    (1996) Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and- imagined places. Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Statistical Center of Iran (The Iranian Authority for General Department of Public Statistics and Statistical Center of Iran)
    Statistical Center of Iran (The Iranian Authority for General Department of Public Statistics and Statistical Center of Iran) (2016) The Statistical Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran. https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Population-and-Housing-Censuses
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tannen, D.
    (2007) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wertsch, J. V.
    (1994) The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1(4), 202–208.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21034.iza
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21034.iza
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bereavement ceremonies; doing penance; entextualization; mourning rites; nexus analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error