1887
Volume 46, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article reports initial parts of a classroom-based action research aimed to teach students to write a literature review (LR), which is considered as a critical, yet often overlooked genre, thus posing difficulties to the students. The existing works on LRs appear to treat the ability to write overviews of individual studies, and to combine them in acceptable ways, as assumed knowledge. In fact, for the learners in the context of the study, and in many second- and foreign-language learning contexts, such abilities are not shared among learners. Therefore, in the implementation of an initial short course, a genre analysis of 60 literature reviews from publications and completed theses in applied linguistics was conducted to identify suitable generic patterns used in literature reviews that could be implemented in the context. The result is a , a genre description of LRs appropriate for the students’ English proficiency level, outlined in detail in this article with the teaching implication for this pedagogical context.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21044.afi
2023-05-23
2024-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akhtar, R., Hassan, H., & Saidalvi, A.
    (2020) The effects of ESL student’s attitude on academic writing apprehensions and academic writing challenges. International journal of psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (5), 5404 – 5412. 10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR2020247
    https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR2020247 [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Badi, I. A. H.
    (2015) Academic writing difficulties of ESL learners. WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings. https://www.westeastinstitute.com/proceedings/2015-barcelona-presentations/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrade, M. S., Evans, N. W. & Hartshorn, K. J.
    (2015) Perceptions and realities of ESL students in higher education: An overview of Institutional Practices. InN. W. Evans, N. J. Anderson, & W. G. Eggington (Eds.), ESL readers and writers in higher education: Understanding challenges, providing support (pp.18–35). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Azizifar, A., Mansoor, K., & Lofti, A. R.
    (2010) An analytical evaluation of locally produced Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the Present. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 36–44. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  5. Badenhorst, C.
    (2018) Citation practice of postgraduate students writing literature reviews. London Review of Education, 16(1), 121 – 135. 10.18546/LRE.16.1.11
    https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.1.11 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beach, R., Bigelow, M., Brendler, B., Coffino, K., Dillon, D., Frederick, A., Gabrielli, M., Helman, L., Ngo, B., O’Brien, D., Rambow, A., Scharber, C., Sethi, J., Braaksma, M., Janssen, T., Thein, A. H., Liang, L., & Stornaiuolo, A.
    (2012) Annotated bibliography of research in the teaching of English. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(2), AB1–AB101.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bednarek, M., Crosthwaite, P., & Garcia, A.
    (2020) Corpus linguistics and education in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(2), 105–116. 10.1075/aral.00029.edi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.00029.edi [Google Scholar]
  8. Bitchener, J.
    (2016) The content feedback practices of applied linguistics doctoral supervisors in New Zealand and Australian universities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 105–121. 10.1075/aral.39.2.01bit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.2.01bit [Google Scholar]
  9. Boote, D. N., & Beile, P.
    (2005) Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation Literature Reviews in research preparation. Educational researcher, 34(6), 3–15. 10.3102/0013189X034006003
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bunton, D.
    (1999) The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18(Supplement 1), S41–S56. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00022‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2002) Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. InJ. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp.57–75). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, X., & Li, M.
    (2019) Chinese learner writers’ niche establishment in the literature review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 391, 48–58. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, A.
    (2007) Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy framework. English for Specific Purposes, 261, 287–307. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coe, R. M.
    (2002) The new rhetoric of genre: writing political briefs. InA. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives (pp.197–210). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Derewianka, B.
    (2001) Pedagogical grammars: Their roles in English language teaching. InA. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analyzing English in a global context: A reader (pp.240–268). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, R.
    (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Forey, G., Besser, S., & Sampson, N.
    (2015) Parental involvement in foreign language learning: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(3), 383–413. 10.1177/1468798415597469
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415597469 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gil-Salom, L., & Soler-Monreal, C.
    (2014) Writers’ positioning in literature reviews in English and Spanish computing doctoral theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 161, 23–39. 10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hart, C.
    (1998) Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2018) Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hector-Mason, S., and Bardack, S.
    (2010) Annotated bibliography. English Language Learner Center American Institutes for Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hood, S.
    (2010) Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230274662
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T.
    (1988) A genre-based investigation of the discussion section in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 71, 113–121. https://distancelearningsection.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/esl_onlinelearning_bibliog2012.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hyland, K.
    (2015) Genre, discipline & identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 191, 32–43. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hyon, S.
    (1996) Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722. 10.2307/3587930
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587930 [Google Scholar]
  26. Johns, A., Bawarshi, A., Coe, R., Hyland, K., Paltridge, B., Rieff, M., & Tardy, C.
    (2006) Crossing the boundaries of genre studies: Commentaries by experts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 151, 234–249. 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kwan, B. S. C.
    (2006) The schematic structure of literature review in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific purposes, 251, 30–55. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Martin, J. R.
    (2009) Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Language and Education, 201, 10–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2014) Looking out: Functional linguistics and genre. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 9(3), 307–321. 10.1558/lhs.v9i3.307
    https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v9i3.307 [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin, J. R., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (1991) Systemic typology and topology. InF. Christie (Ed.), Literacy in social processes: Papers from the inaugural Australian Systemic Linguistics Conference, held at Deakin University, January 1990 (pp.345–383). Centre for Studies in Language in Education, Northern Territory University, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2007) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ng, B. C., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2007) Bilingualism: An advance resource book. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ratnawati, R., Faridah, D., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P.
    (2018) Exploring academic writing needs of Indonesian EFL undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal, 9 (4), 420–432. 10.24093/awej/vol9no4.31
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.31 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rose, D.
    (2012) Genre in the Sydney School. InJ. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp.209–225). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2012) Academic language in teaching and learning: Introduction to special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 409–418. 10.1086/663297
    https://doi.org/10.1086/663297 [Google Scholar]
  36. Soler-Monreal, C.
    (2015) Announcing one’s work in PhD theses in computer science: A comparison of move 3 in literature reviews written in English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1. English for Specific Purposes, 401, 27 – 41. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Soler-Monreal, C., & Gil-Salom, L.
    (2011) A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD theses. International Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 53 – 75. 10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149641
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149641 [Google Scholar]
  38. Starks, D., & Lewis, M.
    (2003) The annotated bibliography: structure and variation within a genre. Australian review of applied linguistics, 26(2), 101–117. 10.1075/aral.26.2.07sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.26.2.07sta [Google Scholar]
  39. Swales, J. M.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (2004) Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2012) A text and its commentaries: Towards a reception history of ‘Genre in three traditions’ (Hyon, 1996). Iberica, 241, 103–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B.
    (2012) Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed). University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.2173936
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936 [Google Scholar]
  43. Thompson, P.
    (2009) Literature review in Applied PhD theses: Evidence and problems. InK. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp.50–67). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230244290_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244290_4 [Google Scholar]
  44. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Xie, J.
    (2016) Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 231, 1–15. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2017) Evaluation in moves: An integrated analysis of Chinese MA thesis literature reviews. English Language teaching, 10(3), 1–20. 10.5539/elt.v10n3p1
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n3p1 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21044.afi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21044.afi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error