Volume 47, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139



In this article I describe the transition of a group of university students in Australia into an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic disruptions. I reflect upon my intersubjective experiences as the lecturer in an unexpected situation of urgency and physical distancing. Research has acknowledged synchronous virtual learning contexts as less psychologically distancing than previously thought. I argue that these contexts can foster profound intimacy between participants through linguistic and multimodal means. I use an auto-ethnographic narrative inquiry approach to share observations gained retrospectively through multimodal, critically reflexive, social semiotic discourse analysis of audio-visual recordings of synchronous workshops conducted in 2020. I attempt to fill the gap in research on intimacy in online educational settings by suggesting that intimacy can be created by and . I advocate moving away from an obsession with standardising and generating student knowledge in formal online learning to a stance that values intimacy, connection, and spontaneity.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Abrahamson, C. E.
    (1998) Storytelling as a pedagogical tool in higher education. Education, 118(3), 440.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikens, J. W., Collibee, C., & Cunningham, J.
    (2015) Gossiping to the top: Observed differences in popular adolescents’ gossip. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(5), 642–661. 10.1177/0272431615617291
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615617291 [Google Scholar]
  3. Akarasriworn, C., & Ku, H. Y.
    (2013) Graduate students’ knowledge construction and attitudes toward online synchronous videoconferencing collaborative environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(1), 35–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, J., & Doherty, M.
    (2004) Learning through work, discourse and participation: Storied lives, self and social-changing cultures. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 44(2), 158–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ananga, P., & Biney, I. K.
    (2017) Comparing face-to-face and online teaching and learning in higher education. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 7(2), 165–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson, G. J.
    (1968) Effects of classroom social climate on individual learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Artino, A. R., & Jones, K. D.
    (2012) Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 151, 170–175. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baepler, P., & Walker, J. D.
    (2014) Active learning classrooms and educational alliances: Changing relationships to improve learning. InP. Baepler, D. C. Brooks, & J. D. Walker (Eds.), Active learning spaces: New directions for teaching and learning (pp.27–40). Wiley. 10.1002/tl.20083
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20083 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bair, D., & Bair, M.
    (2011) Paradoxes of online teaching. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 1–15. 10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050210
    https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050210 [Google Scholar]
  10. Baldry, A. P., & Thibault, P. J.
    (2006) Multimodal transcription and text. Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Baskerville, D.
    (2011) Developing cohesion and building positive relationships through storytelling in a culturally diverse New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 271, 107–115. 10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bateson, G.
    (1953) The position of humor in human communication. InH. von Foerster (Ed.), Cybernetics, Ninth Conference (pp.1–47). Josiah Macey Jr Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Canagarajah, S.
    (2021) Materialising semiotic repertoires: Challenges in the interactional analysis of multilingual communication. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 206–225. 10.1080/14790718.2021.1877293
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1877293 [Google Scholar]
  14. Canagarajah, S., & Dovchin, S.
    (2019) The everyday politics of translingualism as a resistant practice. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 127–144. 10.1080/14790718.2019.1575833
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1575833 [Google Scholar]
  15. Canagarajah, A. S.
    (2004) Subversive identities, pedagogical safe houses, and critical learning. InB. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp.116–137). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524834.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524834.007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P.
    (2006) Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. 10.1007/s11162‑005‑8150‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cekaite, A., & Aronsson, K.
    (2005) Language play, a collaborative resource in children’s L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 169–191. 10.1093/applin/amh042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh042 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, J. C.
    (2020) The interplay of avatar identities, self-efficacy, and language practices. ARAL, 44(1), 65–81. 10.1075/aral.19032.che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19032.che [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, J., & Dobinson, T.
    (2020) Digital communication in a virtual community of practice: Linguistic/paralinguistic behaviour in the multimodal context of Blackboard Collaborate. InS. Dovchin (Ed.), Language, digital communication and society (pp.121–146). P. Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F.
    (1987) Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Coates, J.
    (2007) Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 29–49. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2010) Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1–17. 10.1787/hemp‑v22‑art2‑en
    https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v22-art2-en [Google Scholar]
  23. Coole, D. H., & Frost, S.
    (2010) Introducing the new materialisms. InD. H. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp.1–43). Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822392996‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996-001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Creese, A., Takhi, J. K., & Blackledge, A.
    (2017) Reflexivity in team ethnography: Using researcher vignettes. InM. Martin-Jones & D. Martin (Eds.), Researching multilingualism: Critical and ethnographic perspectives (pp.203–214). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Csikar, E., & Stefaniak, J. E.
    (2018) The utility of storytelling strategies in the biology classroom. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 42–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cumming, R.
    (2007) Language play in the classroom: Encouraging children’s intuitive creativity with words through poetry. Literacy, 41(2), 93–101. 10.1111/j.1467‑9345.2007.00463.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00463.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Cutrone, P.
    (2009) Overcoming Japanese EFL learners’ fear of speaking. Language Studies Working Papers, 1(1), 55–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Davies, C. E.
    (2003) How English-learners joke with native speakers: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics351, 1361–1385. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00181‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00181-9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Denzin, N. K.
    (2000) The practices and politics of interpretation. InN. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.897–922). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dobransky, N. D., & Bainbridge Frymier, A.
    (2004) Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223. 10.1080/01463370409370193
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370193 [Google Scholar]
  31. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2020) Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429485893
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485893 [Google Scholar]
  32. Dovchin, S.
    (2015) Language, multiple authenticities and social media: The online language practices of university students in Mongolia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(4), 437–459. 10.1111/josl.12134
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12134 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S.
    (2017) Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on-and offline. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Espinoza, M.
    (2009) A case study of the production of educational sanctuary in one migrant classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 44–62. 10.1080/15544800802557144
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800802557144 [Google Scholar]
  35. Eynon, T.
    (2001) Metaphor: The impossible translation?British Journal of Psychoanalysis, 17(3), 353–364. 10.1111/j.1752‑0118.2001.tb00596.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.2001.tb00596.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Fludernik, M.
    (2009) An introduction to narratology. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203882887
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882887 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fortune, D., & Mair, H.
    (2011) Notes from the sports club: Confessional tales of two researchers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(4), 457–484. 10.1177/0891241610377093
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241610377093 [Google Scholar]
  38. Garrison, D. R.
    (2009) Communities of inquiry in online learning. InP. L. Rogers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (pp.352–355). IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑60566‑198‑8.ch052
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch052 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gilmore, S., & Warren, S.
    (2007) Emotion online: Experiences of teaching in a virtual learning environment. Human Relations, 60(4), 581–608. 10.1177/0018726707078351
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707078351 [Google Scholar]
  40. Goatly, A.
    (2012) Meaning and humour. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791536
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791536 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Van Osdel, J.
    (2009) Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 609–617.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gray, P.
    (2013) Free to learn: Why unleashing the instinct to play will make our children happier, more self-reliant, and better prepared for life. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Guichon, N., & Cohen, C.
    (2014) The impact of the webcam on an online L2 interaction. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 70(3), 331–354. 10.3138/cmlr.2102
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2102 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P.
    (2007) Ethnography: Principles in practice. Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C.
    (2012) “Everybody is their own island”: Teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 123–144. 10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.967
    https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.967 [Google Scholar]
  46. Heflich, D. A., & Putney, L. G.
    (2001) Intimacy and reflection: Online conversation in a practicum seminar. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(3), 10–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hrastinski, S.
    (2008) Asynchronous and synchronous e-Learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kendall, J. E., & Kendall, K. E.
    (2017) Enhancing online executive education using storytelling: An approach to strengthening online social presence. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 15(1), 62–81. 10.1111/dsji.12121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12121 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kim, J.-H.
    (2015) Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
    (2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lapidaki, E.
    (2020) Toward the discovery of contemporary trust and intimacy in higher education music. InI. M. Yob & E. R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Humane music education for the common good (pp.261–273). Indiana University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvxcrxmm.21
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxcrxmm.21 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lehtonen, M., Page, T., Miloseva, L., & Thorsteinsson, G.
    (2008) Development of social mediation and emotional regulation in virtual learning environment research. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 34–47. 10.26634/jpsy.2.1.357
    https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.357 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lessing, A. D.
    (2013) On intimacy in the classroom. Schools: Studies in education, 10(2), 192–209. 10.1086/673330
    https://doi.org/10.1086/673330 [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, W., & Zhu, H.
    (2019) Tranßcripting: Playful subversion with Chinese characters. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 145–161. 10.1080/14790718.2019.1575834
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1575834 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lin, T. J., & Chen, C. H.
    (2018) A preliminary study of the form and status of passionate affection emoticons. International Journal of Design, 12(2), 75–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R.
    (2004) “There’s millions of them”: Hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics361, 149–184. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00116‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00116-4 [Google Scholar]
  57. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Testimony. InMerriam-Webster.com dictionary. RetrievedDecember 31, 2021, fromhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/testimony
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M.
    (1994) Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ochs, E., & Capps, L.
    (2002) Living narrative. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674041592
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041592 [Google Scholar]
  60. O’Halloran, K.
    (2004) Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. O’Regan, K.
    (2003) Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 78–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Testimony. InOed.com. RetrievedDecember 31, 2021, fromhttps://www.oed.com/view/Entry/199748?rskey=G0VvUl&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid
  63. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T.
    (2005) How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Pérez-Sedeño, E., Almendros, L. S., Dauder, S. G., & Arjonilla, E. M. O.
    (2019) Knowledges, practices and activism from feminist epistemologies. Vernon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Plaza, S. R.
    (2010) Egalitarian dialogue and instrumental dimension: Two principles of dialogic learning in the classroom. Psychology, Society & Education, 2(1), 71–82. 10.25115/psye.v2i1.436
    https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v2i1.436 [Google Scholar]
  66. Pomerantz, A., & Bell, N. D.
    (2011) Humour as a safe house in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 951, 148–161. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01274.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01274.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Reddington, E.
    (2015) Humour and play in language classroom interaction: A review of the literature. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 22–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Richardson, L., & St Pierre, E. A.
    (2008) Writing: A method of inquiry. InN. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp.473–499). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Rogerson-Revell, P.
    (2007) Humour in business: A double-edged sword: A study of humour and style shifting in intercultural business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 391, 4–28. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  70. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W.
    (2001) Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 141. cade.athabascau.ca/vol14.2/rourke_et_al.html
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Rudd, D. P., & Rudd, D. P.
    (2014) The value of video in online instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 131, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Satar, H. M.
    (2015) Sustaining multimodal language learner interactions online. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 480–507. 10.1558/cj.v32i3.26508
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26508 [Google Scholar]
  73. Shin, N.
    (2002) Beyond interaction: The relational construct of transactional presence. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(2), 121–137. 10.1080/02680510220146887
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510220146887 [Google Scholar]
  74. Stevick, E. W.
    (1980) Teaching languages: A way and ways. Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Stojanov, K.
    (2016) Educational justice as respect egalitarianism. Critique and Humanism Journal, 46(2), 249–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sultana, S., & Dovchin, S.
    (2019) Relocalization in digital language practices of university students in Asian peripheries: Critical awareness in a language classroom. Linguistics and Education, 621, 100752. 10.1016/j.linged.2019.100752
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100752 [Google Scholar]
  77. Sultana, S., Dovchin, S., & Pennycook, A.
    (2013) Styling the periphery: Linguistic and cultural takeup in Bangladesh and Mongolia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(5), 687–710. 10.1111/josl.12055
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12055 [Google Scholar]
  78. Swan, K.
    (2003) Developing social presence in online course discussions. InS. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp.147–164). Kogan Page.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Thorpe, S.
    (2008) Enhancing the effectiveness of online groups: An investigation of storytelling in the facilitation of online groups [Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology]. Auckland University of Technology Open Repository. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/778
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Uttamchandani, S.
    (2020) Educational intimacy: Learning, prefiguration, and relationships in an LGBTQ+ youth group’s advocacy efforts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 52–75. 10.1080/10508406.2020.1821202
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1821202 [Google Scholar]
  81. Vakil, S., McKinney de Royston, M., Nasir, N. I. S., & Kirshner, B.
    (2016) Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 194–209. 10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817 [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang, S. S.
    (2015) More than words? The effect of line character sticker use on intimacy in the mobile communication environment. Social Science Computer Review, 34(4), 1–23. 10.1177/0894439315590209
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315590209 [Google Scholar]
  83. Wenger, E.
    (1998) Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Wood, J. T.
    (2002) Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Yin, Y., Chik, A., & Falloon, G.
    (2021) Understanding the translingual practices among international students in multilingual cities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. 10.1075/aral.20070.yin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20070.yin [Google Scholar]
  86. Your Dictionary
    Your Dictionary. (n.d). Testimony. Inyourdictionary.com. RetrievedDecember 31, 2021, fromhttps://www.yourdictionary.com/testimony

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): intimacy; linguaplay; material ecologies; online learning; personal testimonies
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error