1887
Volume 47, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There are few published estimates of vocabulary sizes amongst students in tertiary education. Research does not offer estimates of the vocabulary size tertiary students might be expected to possess, though estimates exist for K-12 education, some EFL contexts, and the general population. Such research is important. For reading comprehension during tertiary education, a vocabulary of minimally 10,000 words is recommended, along with proficiency in academic vocabulary. A recent study of three universities in the United Kingdom concluded pedagogical intervention was required, since estimates indicated undergraduates knew fewer than 10,000 words. A subsequent study of a New Zealand university found students knew 16,000 words and pedagogical intervention was not required. The current study investigates 433 tertiary students at an Australian university to determine if students required vocabulary support. It contributes to a research record allowing for comparisons internationally, nationally, and over time. Methods employed included the Vocabulary Size Test/VST and Academic Vocabulary Test/AVT. Results indicate an average vocabulary size of 16,117 words, with academic vocabulary well-known.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21099.gre
2023-06-08
2025-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amorsen, A., & Miller, M.
    (2017) Children’s oral language development and early literacy practices. Educating Young Children: Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years, 23(1), 24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anglin, J. M.
    (1993) Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. With commentary by George A. Miller and Pamela C. Wakefield. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), i+iii+v-vi+1-186. 10.2307/1166112
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1166112 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N.
    (2001) Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520. 10.1037/0022‑0663.93.3.498
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourke, T., Mills, R., & Siostrom, E.
    (2020) Origins of primary specialisation in Australian education policy: What’s the problem represented to be?The Australian Educational Researcher, 471, 725–740. 10.1007/s13384‑019‑00370‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00370-y [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, D., Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., & McLean, S.
    (2021) The coming paradigm shift in the use of lexical units. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 950–953. 10.1017/S0272263121000668
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000668 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E.
    (2016) How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1116–1116. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clay, M. M.
    (1991) Introducing a new storybook to young readers. The Reading Teacher, 45(4), 264–273. 10.1598/RT.45.4.2
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.45.4.2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coxhead, A.
    (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. 10.2307/3587951
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coxhead, A., Nation, P., & Sim, D.
    (2014) Creating and trialling six versions of the Vocabulary Size Test. TESOLANZ Journal, 221, 13–27. 10.26686/wgtn.12543416.v1
    https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.12543416.v1 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2015) Measuring the vocabulary size of native speakers of English in New Zealand secondary schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 121–135. 10.1007/s40841‑015‑0002‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0002-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. DiCerbo, P. A., Anstrom, K. A., Baker, L. L., & Rivera, C.
    (2014) A Review of the Literature on Teaching Academic English to English Language Learners. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 446–482. 10.3102/0034654314532695
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314532695 [Google Scholar]
  12. Duff, D., & Brydon, M.
    (2020) Estimates of individual differences in vocabulary size in English: How many words are needed to ‘close the vocabulary gap’?Journal of Research in Reading, 43(4), 454–481. 10.1111/1467‑9817.12322
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12322 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M.
    (2007) Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT-4) (4th ed.). Pearson assessments.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, B., Sawyer, J., Gill, R., Medlin, J., & Wilson, D.
    (2005) Influences of the learning environment of a regional university campus on its international graduates. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(2), 65–85. 10.1007/BF03216820
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216820 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gardner, D., & Davies, M.
    (2014) A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327. 10.1093/applin/amt015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015 [Google Scholar]
  16. Graves, M. F.
    (2016) The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Green, C., & Lambert, J.
    (2018) Advancing disciplinary literacy through English for academic purposes: Discipline-specific wordlists, collocations and word families for eight secondary subjects. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 351, 105–115. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Green, C.
    (2022) Computing curriculum time and input for the incidental learning of academic vocabulary. Language, Learning and Technology, 26(1), pp.1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2021) The oral language productive vocabulary profile of children starting school: A resource for teachers. Australian Journal of Education, 65(1), 41–54. 10.1177/0004944120982771
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120982771 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gyllstad, H., McLean, S., & Stewart, J.
    (2020) Using confidence intervals to determine adequate item sample sizes for vocabulary tests: An essential but overlooked practice. Language Testing, Advanced online publication, 1–22. 10.1177/0265532220979562
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220979562 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hart, B., & Risley, T.
    (1995) Meaningful differences in everyday parenting and intellectual development in young American children. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L.
    (2018) Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 1231, 138–149. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  23. Krashen, S. D.
    (2004) The power of reading: Insights from the research. (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited; Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McLean, S.
    (2021) The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(1), 126–140. 10125/67396
    https://doi.org/10125/67396 [Google Scholar]
  25. McLean, S., & Kramer, B.
    (2015) The creation of a new vocabulary levels test. Shiken, 19(2), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McLean, S., Kramer, B., & Beglar, D.
    (2015) The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 741–760. 10.1177/1362168814567889
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814567889 [Google Scholar]
  27. McLean, S., Stewart, J., & Batty, A. O.
    (2020) Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach. Language Testing, 37(3), 389–411. 10.1177/0265532219898380
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219898380 [Google Scholar]
  28. McQuillan, J.
    (2020) Harry Potter and the prisoners of vocabulary instruction: Acquiring academic language at Hogwarts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 32(2), 122–142. 10125/67377
    https://doi.org/10125/67377 [Google Scholar]
  29. Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J.
    (2013) Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 151–172. 10.1515/applirev‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59 – 81. 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D.
    (2007) A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nation, P., & Coxhead, A.
    (2021) Measuring native-speaker vocabulary size. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.233
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.233 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., & Malmström, H.
    (2019) Developing a new academic vocabulary test. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 391, 59–71. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pantelich, M.
    (2021) A student-centred approach: The English Language Support Service for international students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 15(1), 72–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D.
    (2017) How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226. 10.1017/S0261444815000075
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000075 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmitt, N., Nation, P., & Kremmel, B.
    (2020) Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation. Language Teaching, 53(1), 109–120. 10.1017/S0261444819000326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000326 [Google Scholar]
  37. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C.
    (2008) Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., Nation, P., & Pinchbeck, G. G.
    (2021) What the research shows about written receptive vocabulary testing: A reply to Webb. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 462–471. 10.1017/S0272263121000437
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000437 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stoeckel, T., Bennett, P., & McLean, S.
    (2016) Is “I Don’t Know” a viable answer choice on the Vocabulary Size Test?TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 965–975. 10.1002/tesq.325
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.325 [Google Scholar]
  40. Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Nation, P.
    (2021) Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 181–203. 10.1017/S027226312000025X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312000025X [Google Scholar]
  41. Stoeckel, T., Stewart, J., McLean, S., Ishii, T., Kramer, B., & Matsumoto, Y.
    (2019) The relationship of four variants of the Vocabulary Size Test to a criterion measure of meaning recall vocabulary knowledge. System (Linköping), 871, 102161. 10.1016/j.system.2019.102161
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102161 [Google Scholar]
  42. Thomas, D. P.
    (2020) Rapid decline and gender disparities in the NAPLAN writing data. Australian Educational Researcher, 47(5), 777–796. 10.1007/s13384‑019‑00366‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00366-8 [Google Scholar]
  43. Townsend, D., Filippini, A., Collins, P., & Biancarosa, G.
    (2012) Evidence for the importance of academic word knowledge for the academic achievement of diverse middle students. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 497–518. 10.1086/663301
    https://doi.org/10.1086/663301 [Google Scholar]
  44. Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O.
    (2017) The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33–69. 10.1075/itl.168.1.02web
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.02web [Google Scholar]
  45. Wingate, U.
    (2011) A comparison of ‘additional’ and ‘embedded’ approaches to teaching writing in the disciplines. InM. Deane & P. O’Neil (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines. (pp.65–87). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑34451‑8_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34451-8_5 [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, S., & Zhang, X.
    (2022) The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 696–725. 10.1177/1362168820913998
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913998 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21099.gre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.21099.gre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): academic vocabulary; corpus linguistics; tertiary education; vocabulary size
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error