1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper reports on a project (funded by a small Australian Research Council grant) investigating levels of metalinguistic knowledge of English and other languages amongst first-year undergraduate learners of French, Chinese and Italian and the relationship between this knowledge and success in studying a language at university. The study is a partial replication of research undertaken by Alderson, Clapham and Steel (1977) in relation to learners studying French at a number of British universities.

The findings offer no support for the widely-held view that there is a strong connection between learners’ knowledge about language and their success in foreign language study. Results show that, while undergraduate language learners have serious lacunae in their knowledge about language, those who have studied a language other than English (LOTE) at school do better on some measures of metalinguistic knowledge than those who are beginning language study from scratch. However, the results also show that for all three languages there is a weak relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and second language ability. The study points to areas of further research, including a more detailed examination of the relationship between metalinguistic awareness in L1 and L2 and an investigation of those areas of grammar that may be more amenable to explicit grammar teaching.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.22.1.04eld
1999-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson J. C. , C. Clapham and D. Steel
    (1997 forthcoming) Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language in Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderson, J. C.
    (1995) Metalinguistic awareness and second language proficiency. Paper presented at BAAL, September 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloor, T.
    (1986a) What do language students know about grammar?British Journal of Language teaching, 24: 157–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1986b) Variation and prescriptivism in English: Modern language students attitudes to some sociolinguistic issues. CLIE Working PapersNumber7. British Association for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1986c) University students’ knowledge about language. CLIE Working PapersNumber8. British Association for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll, J. B. and S. M. Sapon
    (1959) The Modern Language Aptitude Test. Cleveland, Ohio: Harcourt, Brance, Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carroll, J. B.
    (1962) The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (ed.) Training research and education (pp.87–136). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chapelle, C. and P. Green
    (1992) Field dependence/independence in second language acquisition research. Language Learning42: 47–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb00700.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00700.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Clapham, C.
    (forthcoming) The assessment of metalinguistic knowledge. Language testing: social and research perspectives. Essays in honour of Alan Davies. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Coleman, J.
    (1996) Studying languages: the proficiency, background attitudes and motivation of students of foreign languages in the United Kingdom and Europe. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Donmall, B. G.
    (ed.) (1985) Language awareness. NCLE reports and papers6. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dornyei, Z.
    (1998) Motivation in second and foreign language learningLanguage Teaching31, 117–135. doi: 10.1017/S026144480001315X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001315X [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies, A.
    (1971) Language aptitude in the first year of the UK secondary school. RELC Journal2, 1: 4–19. doi: 10.1177/003368827100200102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827100200102 [Google Scholar]
  14. Davies, A. , C. Elder , J. Hajek , D. Manwaring and J. Warren
    (1996) What do they know? Language awareness amongst tertiary students of LOTE. Australian Language Matters5, 1: 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Elder, C. , A. Davies , J. Hajek , D. Manwaring and J. Warren
    (1996) Is grammar good for you? The relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and success in studying a language at university. Melbourne Papers in Testing5, 1: 35–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis R.
    (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. James, C. and P. Garrett
    (eds) (1991) Language awareness in the classroom. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lando, J.
    (1996) These students were taught grammar: was it worthwhile?In C. Arbonés-Sola , J. Rolin-Ianziti and R. Sussex (eds.) Who’s afraid of teaching grammar?Centre for Language Teaching and Research. Papers inLanguage Teaching and Linguistics Linguistics 1: 27–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lightbown, P.
    (1992) What have we here? Some observations of the influence of instruction on second language learning. In R. Phillipson , E. Kellerman , L. Selinker , M. Sharwood-Smith and M. Swan (eds) Foreign/second language pedagogy research. Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, 197–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lowe, M. and L. Wales
    (1996) Language awareness in L1 and its impact upon progress in L2. In C. Arbonés-Sola , J. Rolin-Ianziti and R. Sussex (eds) Who’s afraid of teaching grammar?Centre for Language Teaching and Research. Papers inLanguage Teaching and Linguistics Linguistics 1: 121–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McKay, P.
    (1996) How communicative are we, how communicative should we be?In C. Arbonés-Sola , J. Rolin-Ianziti and R. Sussex (eds.) Who’s afraid of teaching grammar?Centre for Language Teaching and Research. Papers inLanguage Teaching and Linguistics Linguistics 1: 11–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McLaughlin, B.
    (1978) The monitor model: some methodological considerations. Language Learning28: 309–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1978.tb00137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00137.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitchell, R.
    (1988) Communicative language teaching in practice. London: CILT.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Richmond, J.
    (1990) What do we mean by knowledge about language?In Ronald Carter (ed.) Knowledge about language and the curriculum: the LINC Reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rutherford, W.E.
    (1987) Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharwood Smith, M.
    (1981) Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics 2:159–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sorace. A.
    (1985) Metalinguistic knowledge and use of the language in acquisition poor environments. Applied Linguistics6: 239–54. doi: 10.1093/applin/6.3.239
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.3.239 [Google Scholar]
  28. Steel, D. and J.C. Alderson
    (1994) Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. In D. Graddol and S. Thomas (eds) Language in a changing Europe. Clevedon: BAAL and Multilingual Matters. 92–103.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.22.1.04eld
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error