1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Analysis of a series of seminars given by CSIRO computer scientists indicates that the use of the discourse marker: is not random; rather, it plays an important role in orienting the listener to the overall structure of the seminar. This paper shows how occurs in specific environments, with specific prosodic features, and how its role and function vary according to where it occurs within the talk. occurs most frequently at the boundary of one section of talk and the next, although its function varies according to whether it is associated with the beginning or with the end of a section of talk. This paper highlights the close interaction between talk and action, with special emphasis on the precise way in which saying is co-ordinated with placing the overhead slide on the screen.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.22.2.02ren
1999-01-01
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, J.M. and J. Heritage
    (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversational Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beach, W.
    (1990) Language as and in technology: Facilitating topic organisation in a videotex focus group meeting. In M.J. Medhurst , A. Gonzalez and T.R. Peterson (eds) Communication and the Culture of Technology. Pullman (WA), Washington State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1993) Transitional regularities for ‘causal’ ‘okay’ usages. Journal of Pragmatics19: 325–352. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90092‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, G and G. Yule
    (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226 [Google Scholar]
  5. Button, G.
    (1987) >Moving out of closings. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1990) On varieties of closing. In G. Psathas (ed.) Interaction Competence: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Washington, DC, International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Button, G. and J.R.E. Lee
    (eds) (1987) Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chafe W.L.
    (1979) The flow of thought and the flow of language. In T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax Vol 12. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaudron, C. and J. Richards
    (1986) The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics7, 2: 113–127. doi: 10.1093/applin/7.2.113
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.2.113 [Google Scholar]
  10. Condon, S.
    (1986) The discourse functions of OK. Semiotica60: 73–101. doi: 10.1515/semi.1986.60.1‑2.73
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.60.1-2.73 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dorr-Bremme, D.W.
    (1990) Contextualisation cues in the classroom: Discourse regulation and social control functions. Language in Society19: 379–402. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500014561
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014561 [Google Scholar]
  12. Flowerdew, J. and S. Tauroza
    (1995) The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition17: 435–458. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100014406
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014406 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraser, B.
    (1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics14: 383–395. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90096‑V
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner, R.
    (1994) Conversation analysis transcription. In Rod Gardner (ed.) Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia (Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S No. 11). ALAA, Canberra, pp.185–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, E.
    (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hatch, E.
    (1992) Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hinds, J.
    (1979) Organizational patterns in discourse. In T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jucker, A.H.
    (1993) The discourse marker well: a relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics19: 435–452. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90004‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90004-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Merritt, M.
    (1984) On the use of O.K. in service encounters. In J. Baugh and J. Sherzer (eds) Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rendle-Short, J.
    (1998) Discourse Markers in Computer Science Seminar Talk. MA Thesis, Department of Linguistics, ANU.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sacks, H.
    (1984) On doing “being ordinary”. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversational Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff , G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest sematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language50, 4: 695–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schegloff, E.A.
    (1979) Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnometh-odology. New York, Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies9: 111–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00148124
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1995) Sequence Organization. Manuscript, Department of Sociology, UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schegloff, E.A. and H. Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8: 289–327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  27. Schiffrin, D.
    (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  28. Segel, E.M. , J.F. Duchan , and P.J. Scott
    (1991) The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes14: 27–54. doi: 10.1080/01638539109544773
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544773 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sinclair, J. and M. Coulthard
    (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.22.2.02ren
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error