1887
image of Evaluating stakeholders in information for parents of children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Parents of children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (D/HH) need clear and complete information about early intervention options. There is a body of research on parents’ reactions to, and perceptions of, information they encountered following their child’s diagnosis, but little research examining the information itself. This paper reports on a research project examining the evaluative meanings of information on the websites of the two early intervention providers in NSW, Australia. Both providers describe their services as “family-centered” on their websites. The appraisal framework from systemic functional linguistics was used to analyze each website. Specifically, evaluations regarding the ‘capacity’ of providers and D/HH children are reported here. Providers are consistently evaluated as altruistic and expert, while D/HH children are consistently evaluated as requiring the specific kind of intervention program offered by these organizations in order to live a “normal” or “successful” life. Coupled with the lack of information about alternative approaches to early intervention, the information provided appears to be inconsistent with principles of family-centered intervention.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.22036.kec
2023-10-23
2024-10-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2007) Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. https://www.infanthearing.org/resources/2007_JCIH.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Australian Government
    Australian Government (2005) Disability standards for education 2005. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/dse-fact-sheet-2-dse_0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednarek, M.
    (2007) Polyphony in appraisal: Typological and topological perspectives. Linguistics & the Human Sciences, (), –. 10.1558/lhs.v3i2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v3i2.107 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brookes, G., & Harvey, K.
    (2015) Peddling a semiotics of fear: A critical examination of scare tactics and commercial strategies in public health promotion. Social Semiotics, (), –. 10.1080/10350330.2014.988920
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.988920 [Google Scholar]
  5. Decker, K. B., & Vallotton, C. D.
    (2016) Early intervention for children with hearing loss: Information parents receive about supporting children’s language. Journal of Early Intervention, (), –. 10.1177/1053815116653448
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116653448 [Google Scholar]
  6. Division for Early Childhood
    Division for Early Childhood (2014) Recommended practices in early intervention and early childhood special education. www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Djonov, E.
    (2007) Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: A systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective. Information Design Journal, (), –. 10.1075/idj.15.2.07djo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.2.07djo [Google Scholar]
  8. Djonov, E., & Knox, J. S.
    (2014) How to analyze webpages. InS. Norris & C. D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, images and texts: A reader in multimodality (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511175.171
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511175.171 [Google Scholar]
  9. ECIA (Early Childhood Intervention Australia)
    ECIA (Early Childhood Intervention Australia) (2016) ECIA national guidelines on best practice in early intervention. www.ecia.org.au/resources/best-practice-guidelines
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferrell, K. A., Bruce, S., & Luckner, J. L.
    (2014) Evidence-based practices for students with sensory impairments (Document No. IC-4). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Friedner, M., & Block, P.
    (2023) Recuperating the bad outcome: Reimagining optimal futures beyond Auditory Verbal Therapy and Applied Behavioral Analysis. The Senses and Society, (), –. 10.1080/17458927.2022.2138090
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2022.2138090 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuoli, M., & Hommerberg, C.
    (2015) Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora, (), –. 10.3366/cor.2015.0080
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0080 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gale, E.
    (2021) Collaborating with deaf adults in early intervention. Young Exceptional Children, (), –. 10.1177/1096250620939510
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250620939510 [Google Scholar]
  14. Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. R.
    (2012) Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduction Journal, (). 10.1186/1477‑7517‑9‑16
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-9-16 [Google Scholar]
  15. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing
    Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (2007) Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics, , –. 10.1542/peds.2007‑2333
    https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2333 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kecman, E.
    (2017) Exploring ‘attitude’ in information for parents of newly identified deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH) children in NSW: An appraisal analysis of two early intervention websites [Unpublished Master thesis]. Macquarie University. 10.25949/19434020.v1
    https://doi.org/10.25949/19434020.v1 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2019) Old challenges, changing contexts: Reviewing and reflecting on information provision for parents of children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing. Deafness and Education International, (), –. 10.1080/14643154.2018.1506072
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2018.1506072 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kite, B. J.
    (2020) How the medical professionals impact ASL and English families’ language planning policy. Psychology in the Schools, (), –. 10.1002/pits.22324
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22324 [Google Scholar]
  19. Knoors, H., & Marschark, M.
    (Eds.) (2015) Educating deaf learners: Creating a global evidence base. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215194.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215194.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lane, H.
    (1995) Constructions of deafness. Disability & Society, (), –. 10.1080/09687599550023633
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599550023633 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lane, H. L.
    (1992) The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf community. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Leigh, G., & Marschark, M.
    (2016) Recognizing diversity in deaf education: From Paris to Athens with a diversion to Milan. InM. Marschark, V. Lampropoulou, & E. Skordilis (Eds.), Diversity in deaf education (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190493073.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190493073.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Marschark, M., & Spencer, P.
    (2010) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R.
    (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave/Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  25. Matthijs, L., Hardonk, S., Sermijn, J., Van Puyvelde, M., Leigh, G., Van Herreweghe, M., & Loots, G.
    (2017) Mothers of deaf children in the 21st century. Dynamic positioning between the medical and cultural–linguistic discourses. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (), –. 10.1093/deafed/enx021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx021 [Google Scholar]
  26. Matthijs, L., Loots, G., Mouvet, K., Van Herreweghe, M., Hardonk, S., Van Hove, G., & Leigh, G.
    (2012) First information parents receive after UNHS detection of their baby’s hearing loss. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (), –. 10.1093/deafed/ens020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens020 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mauldin, L.
    (2016) Made to hear: Cochlear implants and raising deaf children. University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816697243.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816697243.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Moeller, M. P., Carr, G., Seaver, L., Stredler-Brown, A., & Holzinger, D.
    (2013) Best practices in family-centered early intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: An international consensus statement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (), –. 10.1093/deafed/ent034
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ent034 [Google Scholar]
  29. Perlmutter, D.
    (2003) The internet: Big pictures and interactors. InL. Gross, J. Katz, & R. Jay (Eds.), Image ethics in the digital age (pp.–). University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Porter, A., Creed, P., Hood, M., & Ching, T. Y.
    (2018) Parental decision-making and deaf children: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (), –. 10.1093/deafed/eny019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eny019 [Google Scholar]
  31. Snoddon, K.
    (2021) “It seemed like if you chose sign language you were going to be punished”: A narrative case study of participant experiences with supporting a deaf child in Ontario early childhood education and care. Deafness & Education International, (), –. 10.1080/14643154.2020.1840763
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2020.1840763 [Google Scholar]
  32. Soo-Guan Khoo, C., Nourbakhsh, A., & Na, J.-C.
    (2012) Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory. Online Information Review, (), –. 10.1108/14684521211287936
    https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211287936 [Google Scholar]
  33. Su, H.
    (2016) How products are evaluated? Evaluation in customer review texts. Language Resources and Evaluation, (), –. 10.1007/s10579‑015‑9323‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-015-9323-6 [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoshinaga-Itano, C.
    (2014) Principles and guidelines for early intervention after confirmation that a child is deaf or hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (), –. 10.1093/deafed/ent043
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ent043 [Google Scholar]
  35. Young, A., Carr, G., Hunt, R., McCracken, W., Skipp, A., & Tattersall, H.
    (2006) Informed choice and deaf children: Underpinning concepts and enduring challenges. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (), –. 10.1093/deafed/enj041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enj041 [Google Scholar]
  36. Young, A., Jones, D., Starmer, C., & Sutherland, H.
    (2005) Issues and dilemmas in the production of standard information for parents of young deaf children: Parents’ views. Deafness & Education International, (), –. 10.1179/146431505790560400
    https://doi.org/10.1179/146431505790560400 [Google Scholar]
  37. Young, A., & Temple, B.
    (2014) Approaches to social research: The case of deaf studies. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199929535.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199929535.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.22036.kec
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.22036.kec
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error