1887
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Whole Class Text Response Discussions (WCTRD) are pervasive in secondary English and represent one site in which students can learn to adopt the habits of critical thought that are promoted in state and national Curriculum documents. In this study, the phasal structures (Gregory and Malcolm 1981) of a variety of such WCTRDs in Australian secondary English classrooms were examined. It was found that teachers in such WCTRDs regularly made limited selections from the available pool of phases, such selections regularly scaffolding a narrow range of literate and moral skills, but offering little support for the development of critical and analytical response. Such results suggest that despite a shift at an academic and professional development level towards more critically-oriented models of text response, day-to-day discursive practice in some secondary English classrooms in Australia is still very much grounded in Reader Response practices (Iser 1978) that contribute to the development of morally compliant citizens. One WCTRD was selected for closer analysis of how the textual, experiential and interpersonal meanings (Halliday 1994) operated to privilege students’ ‘personal response’ over critical response. Through the examination of Transitivity and Conversational Structural choices in particular, a picture was provided of how this WCTRD was structured to encourage students to rehearse previously appropriated ideologies, rather than to critically or analytically interrogate these ideologies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.23.1.03lov
2000-01-01
2018-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, C.
    (1997) Literacy practices and classroom order. In S. Muspratt , A. Luke , and P. Freebody (eds), Constructing critical literacies, 243–261. St. Leonards, N.S.W., Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benton, M. and Fox, G.
    (1985) Teaching literature: nine to fourteen. Melbourne, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Christie, F.
    (1995) The Teaching of English literature in secondary school English: a case study (ARC Report Number 1 into the Pedagogic Discourse of Secondary School English). The University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1999) The pedagogic device and the teaching of English. In F. Christie (ed.) Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness, 156–184. London, Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Corcoran, B.
    (1987) Teachers creating readers. In B. Corcoran (ed.) Readers, texts, teachers, 41–74. New Jersey, Boynton Cook.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1992) The making and remaking of readers and writers: a retrospect and prospect. In J. Thomson (ed.), Reconstructing literature teaching: new essays on the teaching of literature, 71–82. Norwood, S.A., AATE.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cranny-Francis, A.
    (1991) The value of genre in English literature teaching. In F. Christie , B. Devlin , P. Freebody , A. Luke , J. Martin , T. Threadgold , and C. Walton (eds) Teaching English literacy: a project of national significance on the preservice preparation of teachers for teaching English literacy, 159–174. Darwin, Centre for Studies of Language in Education, Darwin University.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1996) Technology and/or weapon: the discipline of reading in the secondary English classroom. In R. Hasan and G. Williams (eds), Literacy in society, 172–190. London, Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, B.
    (1993) Beyond dualism and towards multiple subjectivities. In L. Christian-Smith (ed.) Texts of desire: essays on fiction, femininity and schooling, 145–173. London, Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilbert, P.
    (1987) Post reader-response: the deconstructive critique. In B. Corcoran (ed.), Readers, texts, teachers, 234–250. New Jersey, Boynton Cook.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gregory, M. and Malcolm, K.
    (1981) Generic situation and discourse phase. Mimeo: Applied Linguistics Research Working Group. Glendon College, York University, Toronto, Canada
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, M.A.K.
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M.A.K. , and Hasan, R.
    (1985) Language, context and text. Melbourne, Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heap, J.
    (1985) Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: reading lessons. Curriculum Enquiry15, 3: 245–279. doi: 10.1080/03626784.1985.11075966
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1985.11075966 [Google Scholar]
  15. Horowitz, R.
    (1994) Classroom talk about text. Journal of Reading31, 7: 532–538.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunter, I.
    (1988) Culture and government: the emergence of literary education. London, Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑07867‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07867-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) Four anxieties about English. Interpretations27, 3: 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Iser, W.
    (1978) The act of reading. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kamler, B.
    (1992) The social construction of free writing topic choice in the process writing classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy15, 2: 105–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Love, K.
    (1996) Talk around text: acquiescence or empowerment in secondary English?Australian Review of Applied Linguistics19, 2: 1–26 doi: 10.1075/aral.19.2.01lov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19.2.01lov [Google Scholar]
  21. (1999) The whole class text response discussion genre in secondary English: a case study. Unpublished Ph.D, The University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Love, K. , and Suherdi, D.
    (1996) The negotiation of knowledge in an adult ESL class. Linguistics and Education8, 3: 229–267. doi: 10.1016/S0898‑5898(96)90023‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90023-6 [Google Scholar]
  23. Luke, A. , P. Freebody , and P. Gilbert
    (1991) What counts as reading in the secondary school classroom – selective traditions of reading practices and positions. In F. Christie et al. (eds), Teaching English literacy, a project of national significance on the preservice preparation of teachers to teach English literacy. Vol 2: Readings, 113–124. Darwin: Centre for Studies in Language Education, Northern Territory University.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin, J.R.
    (1992) English text: system and structure. Philadelphia, John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  25. Macken-Horarik, M.
    (1996) Constructing the invisible: specialized literacy practices in junior secondary English. Ph.D., University of Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mellor, B. , A. Patterson , and M. O’Neill
    (1991) Reading fictions. Scarborough, Western Australia, Chalkface Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mellor, B. , and A. Patterson
    (1994) The reading lesson. Interpretations27, 3: 20–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Merriam, S.B.
    (1998) Qualitative research and case-study: applications in education. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Misson, R.
    (1996) What’s in it for me?: teaching against homophobic discourse. In L. Laskey and C. Beavis (eds), Schooling and sexualities: teaching for a positive sexuality, 117–129. Geelong, Deakin Centre for Education and Change.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Morgan, W.
    (1994) Resisting reading within/against post-structuralisms. English in Australia109: 7–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Morris, A. and N. Stewart-Dore
    (1984) Learning to learn from text: effective readings in the content areas. Sydney, Addison Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pallotta-Chiarolli, M.
    (1995) “Only your labels split me”: interweaving ethnicity and sexuality in English studies. English in Australia112: 33–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomson, J.
    (1987) Understanding teenagers’ reading. Adelaide, AATE.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1992) (ed.) Reconstructing literature teaching: new essays on the teaching of literature. Norwood, S.A., AATE.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ventola, E.
    (1987) The structure of social interaction. London, Frances Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.23.1.03lov
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error