Understanding signals and reading comprehension

References

1. Allison, D. , S. Varghese , and S.M. Wu
   (1999) Local coherence and its limits: a second look at second sentences. Journal of Second Language Writing8,1: 77–97. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(99)80113‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80113-1 [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, J.R.
   (1983) The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. De Beaugrande, R.
   (1997) New foundation for a science of text and discourse: cognition, communication, and the freedom of access to knowledge and society. Norwood, N.J., Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
4. De Beaugrande, R. and W. Dressier
   (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London, Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Britton, B.K. , S.M. Glynn , B.J F. Meyer and M.J. Penland
   (1982) Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology74:51–61. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.74.1.51
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.1.51 [Google Scholar]
6. Charrow, V.R. and J.C. Redish
   (1980) A study of standardized headings for warranties. (Technical Report No.6, Document Design Project). Washington, D.C., National Institute of Education.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Connor, U. and A.M. Johns
   (1990) Coherence in writing: research and pedagogical perspectives. U.S.A., Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Davidson, J.E. , R. Deuser , and R.J. Sternberg
   (1994) The role of metacogntion in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe and A.P. Shimamura (eds) Metacognition; knowing about knowing, 207–226. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Evensen, L.S.
   (1985) Connectors in student writing: a methodological note. NORDTEXTNewsletter4: 1–6.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Evensen, L.S.
    (1990) Pointers to superstructure in student writing. In U. Connor and A.M. Johns (eds) Coherence in writing; research and pedagogical perspectives. U.S.A., Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Geva, E.
    (1992) The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly26,4: 731–747. doi: 10.2307/3586871
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586871 [Google Scholar]
12. Geva, E. and E.B. Ryan
    (1985) Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behaviour17:331–345.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Glaser, R. and J.W. Pellegrino
    (1987) Aptitudes for learning and cognitive processes. In F.E. Weinert and R.H. Kluwe (eds) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, 267–288. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Halliday, M.A.K.
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2ndedition). London, Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan,
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London, Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hartley, J. , J. Kenely , G. Owen , and M. Trueman
    (1980) The effect of headings on children’s recall from prose text. British Journal of Educational Psychology50:304–307. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8279.1980.tb00816.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1980.tb00816.x [Google Scholar]
17. Heath, R.L. and J. Bryant
    (1992) Human communication theory and research. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hoey, M.
    (1983) On the surface of discourse. Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hoey, M.
    (1991) Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Holley, C. D. , D.F. Dansereau , S.H. Evans , K.W. Collins , L. Brooks and D.Larson
    (1981) Utilizing intact and embedded headings as processing aids with nonnarrative text. Contemporary Educational Psychology6:227–236. doi: 10.1016/0361‑476X(81)90003‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(81)90003-5 [Google Scholar]
21. Irwin, J.W.
    (1982) The effects of coherence explicitness on college readers’ prose comprehension. Journal of Reading Behaviour14:275–284.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Johns, A.M.
    (1986) Coherence and academic writing: some definitions and suggestions for teaching. TESOL Quarterly20,2: 47–265. doi: 10.2307/3586543
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586543 [Google Scholar]
23. Kintsch, W. and T.A. van Dijk
    (1978) Towards a model of discourse comprehension and production. Psychological Review85:363–394. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.85.5.363
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363 [Google Scholar]
24. Kintsch, W.
    (1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension. The Construction-Integration model of text comprehension. Psychological Review95: 163–182. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.95.2.163
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163 [Google Scholar]
25. Loman, N.L. and R.E. Mayer
    (1983) Signalling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology75:402–412 doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.75.3.402
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.402 [Google Scholar]
26. Marshall, N. and M.D. Glock
    (1978) Comprehension of connected discourse: a study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled. Reading Research Quarterly14:10–56. doi: 10.2307/747293
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747293 [Google Scholar]
27. Meyer, B.J.F.
    (1975) The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Meyer, B.J.F.
    (1979) Organizational patterns in prose and their use in reading. In M.L. Kamil and A.J. Moe (eds) Reading research: studies and applications. Clemson, S.C., National Reading Conference, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Meyer, B.J.F. , D.M. Brandt , and G.J. Bluth
    (1980) Use of top-level structure in text: key for reading comprehension of ninth grade students. Reading Research Quarterly16:72–101. doi: 10.2307/747349
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747349 [Google Scholar]
30. Otero, J.
    (1998) Influence of knowledge activation and context on comprehension monitoring of science texts. In D.J. Hacker , J. Dunlosky , and A.C. Grasser (eds) Metacognition in educational theory and practice, 145–164. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Reid, J.
    (1996) U.S. academic readers, ESL writers, and second sentences. Journal of Second Language Writing5:129–161. doi: 10.1016/S1060‑3743(96)90022‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90022-3 [Google Scholar]
32. Spyridakis, J.H.
    (1986) Headings, logical connectives, and previews: effects on reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Spyridakis, J.H. and T.C. Standal
    (1986) Headings, previews, logical connectives; effects on reading comprehension. Journal of Technical Writing And Communication16,4: 343–354.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Spyridakis, J.H.
    (1989) Signalling effects: a review of the research, Part I. Journal of Technical Writing And Communication19,3; 227–240. doi: 10.2190/UA49‑PQ9K‑H1MN‑DYK9
    https://doi.org/10.2190/UA49-PQ9K-H1MN-DYK9 [Google Scholar]
35. van Dijk, T.A.
    (1980) Macrostructures. Hillsdale N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
36. van Dijk, T.A.
    (1981) Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. The Hague, Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110826142
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110826142 [Google Scholar]
37. van Dijk, T.A.
    (1995) In C.A. Weaver III , S. Mannes and C.R. Fletcher (eds) Discourse comprehension: essays in honour of Walter Kintsch, 383–410. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
38. van Dijk, T.A. and W. Kintsch
    (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, Academic Press
    [Google Scholar]