1887
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Many studies of telephone interaction have concentrated on the opening sequences of telephone calls using the model developed by Schegloff (1968, 1979, 1986) using North American data as a starting point. This study uses this model as a starting point to examine telephone openings in Samoa. A comparison between Samoan telephone calls shows many similarities with Schegloff’s model, but also shows that some features of the interaction are culturally variable. These variations are primarily variations in the frequency and distribution of activities within the opening section, rather than a difference in type. In particular, Samoan telephone openings are typified by a reduced use of greetings, different types of phatic moves and less reciprocity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.23.1.06soo
2000-01-01
2019-08-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Duranti, A.
    (1992) Language and bodies in social spaces: Samoan ceremonial greetings. American Anthropologist94,3: 657–691. doi: 10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00070
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00070 [Google Scholar]
  2. Duranti, A. and E. Ochs
    (1986) Literacy instruction in a Samoan village. In B.B. Schieffelin and P. Gilmore (eds) The acquisition of literacy: ethnographic perspectives. Norwood, N.J., Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Godard, D.
    (1977) Same setting, different norms: phone call beginnings in France and the United States. Language in Society6:209–219. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500007259
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007259 [Google Scholar]
  4. Goffman, E.
    (1963) Behaviour in public places. New York, MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1967) Interaction ritual: essays in face to face behaviour. Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1971) Relations in public. New York, Basic.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goody, E.
    (1972) "Greeting", "begging" and the presentation of respect. In J.S. La Fontaine (ed.) The interpretation of ritual, 37–71. London, Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hopper, R.
    (1989) Speech in telephone openings: emergent interaction vs routines. Western Journal of Speech Communication53:178–194. doi: 10.1080/10570318909374299
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374299 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1991) Telephone conversation. Bloomington, University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hopper, R. and N.K. Doany
    (1989) Telephone openings and conversational universals: a study in three languages. In S. Ting-Toomey and F. Korzenny (eds) Language, communication and culture, 157–179. Newbury Park, Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hopper, R. , N. Doany , M. Johnson and K. Drummond
    (1991) Universals and particulars in telephone openings. Research in Language and Social Interaction25,367–385.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.
    (1991) Opening sequences in Dutch telephone conversation. In D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and social structure, 232–250. Berkeley, University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Imaishi, S.
    (1992) Denvva no kaiwa no sutoratejii. (Strategies for telephone conversations). Nihongogaku11:65–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumatoridani, T.
    (1992) Denwa kaiwa no kaishi to shuuketsu ni okeru ‘hai’ to ‘moshi moshi’ to ‘ja’ no danwa bunseki. (Discourse analysis of ‘hai’, ‘moshi moshi’ and ‘ja’ in telephone conversation openings and closings. Nihongogaku11:14–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lindstrom, A.
    (1994) Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. Language in Society23:231–252. doi: 10.1017/S004740450001784X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001784X [Google Scholar]
  16. Malinowski, B.
    (1959) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards (eds), The meaning of meaning, 296–336. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Moerman, M.
    (1988) Talking culture: ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812200355
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200355 [Google Scholar]
  18. Mosel, U. and E. Hovdhaugen
    (1992) Samoan reference grammar. Oslo, Scandinavian University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nofsinger, R.
    (1975) The demand ticket: a conversational device for getting the floor. Speech monographs42:1–9. doi: 10.1080/03637757509375871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757509375871 [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Loughlin, K.
    (1990) Telephone openings in Australia. Melbourne Papers in Applied Linguistics1,2: 27–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Onodera, N.
    (1992) Esunometadorojii ni akeru denwa kaiwa no kenkyuu to nihongo deeta e no ooyoo. (The study of telephone conversations in ethnomethodology and its application to data in Japanese). Nihongogaku11:26–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sacks, H.
    (1975) Everyone has to lie. In B. Blount and M. Sanches (eds) Sociocultural dimensions of language use, 57–80. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1992) Lectures on conversation. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language50:696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schegloff, E.A.
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropology70,6; 1075–1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1979) Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York, Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies. 9,2–3: 111–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00148124
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124 [Google Scholar]
  28. Sifianou, M.
    (1989) On the telephone again! Differences in behaviour: England versus Greece. Language in Society18:527–544. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500013890
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013890 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.23.1.06soo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error