Complexities in describing and using standards in languages education in the school setting

References

1. Bachman, L.F.
   (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bachman, L.F. and A. Palmer
   (1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ball, S.
   (2000) Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards the performative society?Australian Educational Researcher27, 2: 1–23. doi: 10.1007/BF03219719
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219719 [Google Scholar]
4. Board of Studies of Victoria
   Board of Studies of Victoria (2000) Curriculum Standards Framework (CSFII). Melbourne Board of Studies.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brindley, G.
   (1998) Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning programs: a review of the issues. Language Testing15, 1: 45–85.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Canale, M. and M. Swain
   (1981) A theoretical framework for communicative competence. In A. Palmer et al. (eds) The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Washington, Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Department of Education, Training and Employment
   Department of Education, Training and Employment (2000) The South Australian Curriculum Standards and Accountability (SACSA) FrameworkUnpublished final draft, November 2000 available online atwww.sacsa.nexus.edu.au
8. Lantolf, J. and W. Frawley
   (1992) Proficiency: understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10, 2: 181–196. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007300
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007300 [Google Scholar]
9. Lantolf, J. and W. Frawley
   (1988) Rejecting the OPI - again. ADFL Bulletin23, 2: 34–37.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Larter, S.
    (1991) Benchmarks. The development of a new approach to student evaluation. Toronto, Toronto Board of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
11. MCEETYA
    MCEETYA (1999) Australia’s common and agreed national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Ministerial Council for Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
12. McKay. P.
    (2000) Are some standards more effective than others?Paper presented atthe XXth World Congress of the Féderation Internationale de Professeurs de Languages Vivantes (FIPLV), Paris, 22-26 July 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
13. McNamara, T.
    (1996) Measuring second language performance. London and New York, Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Messick, S.
    (1989) Validity. In R. Linn (ed) Educational measurement (3rd edition). New York, American Council on Education, Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Reardon, S.F.
    (1994) Introduction to Symposium: Equity in Educational Assessment. Harvard Educational Review64, 1: 1–4. doi: 10.17763/haer.64.1.30t3h163v1327230
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.64.1.30t3h163v1327230 [Google Scholar]
16. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Spolsky, B.
    (1993) Testing and examinations in a national foreign language policy. In K. Sajavaara ( et al., eds). National foreign language policies, practices and prospects, 194–214. University of Jyväskyla.
    [Google Scholar]