1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Implementing feedback literacy practices through self-assessment and peer feedback
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper draws on language socialization theory and uses narrative frames and interview to investigate an international student’s socialization into feedback literacy practices in an EAP classroom. The analysis of findings shows that using a narrative frame methodology is an effective assessment tool that helps students assess and reflect on their own learning because they help students develop an ability to: (1) learn to judge their own and their peers’ performance and develop evaluative judgment, (2) socialize themselves and be socialized into literacy norms of their academic context, and (3) follow up their own learning trajectories and learning to learn by reflecting on their current and possible future performance in familiar and unfamiliar work and life contexts. The study concludes that socialization into feedback practices becomes significant when the linguistic, literate, and cultural practices of students are recognized as resources and assets in their classroom community.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.23053.sol
2024-03-04
2024-10-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.23053.sol
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U.
    (1990) Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms. The Writing Instructor, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, T.
    (2021) The socialization of L2 doctoral students through written feedback. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, (), –. 10.1080/15348458.2020.1726758
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1726758 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barkhuizen, G.
    (2011) Narrative knowledging in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.5054/tq.2011.261888
     https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.261888 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2014) Revisiting narrative frames: An instrument for investigating language teaching and learning. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  5. Belachew, M., Getinet, M., & Gashaye, A.
    (2015) Perception and practice of self-assessment in EFL writing classrooms. Journal of Languages and Culture, (), –. 10.5897/JLC2013.0254
     https://doi.org/10.5897/JLC2013.0254 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, R. E.
    (2011) Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, (), –. 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biggs, J.
    (2016) Constructive alignment. Assessment@ Bond, , .
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boud, D.
    (1995) Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary. InP. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2015) Feedback: ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. Clinical Teacher, (), –. 10.1111/tct.12345
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12345 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, G.; Harris, Lois
    (2013) Student self-assessment. CQUniversity. Chapter. https://hdl.handle.net/10018/1024938
  11. Bucholtz, M., Casillas, D. I., & Lee, J. S.
    (2017) Language and culture as sustenance. InD. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp.–). Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Candlin, C. N., & Sarangi, S.
    (2003) Introduction: Trading between reflexivity and relevance: New challenges for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/24.3.271
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.271 [Google Scholar]
  13. Carless, D.
    (2012) Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. InD. Boud and E. Molly’sFeedback in higher and professional education (pp.–). New York, Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. (2022) From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1177/1469787420945845
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420945845 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carless, D., & Boud, D.
    (2018) The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 [Google Scholar]
  16. Carless, D., & Winstone, N.
    (2023) Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cassidy, S.
    (2007) Assessing ‘inexperienced’students’ ability to self-assess: exploring links with learning style and academic personal control. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602930600896704
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600896704 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chan, C. K. Y., & Luo, J.
    (2022) Exploring teacher perceptions of different types of ‘feedback practices’ in higher education: implications for teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2021.1888074
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888074 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chaparro, S. E.
    (2023) Martín and the pink crayon: peer language socialization in a kindergarten bilingual classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2020.1786495
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1786495 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chaudron, C.
    (1984) The effects of feedback on students’ composition revisions. RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/003368828401500201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828401500201 [Google Scholar]
  21. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K.
    (1994) Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?Journal of Second Language Writing, (), –. 10.1016/1060‑3743(94)90019‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Costa, P. I.
    (2015) Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315816937
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816937 [Google Scholar]
  23. Friedman, D. A.
    (2023) Language socialization and academic discourse in English as a Foreign Language contexts: A research agenda. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444821000422
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000422 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gall, M., Borg, W., & Gall, J.
    (2003) Educational research: An introduction. Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Garrett, P. B.
    (2020) Language socialization. The International Encyclopaedia of Linguistic Anthropology, –. 10.1002/9781118786093.iela0222
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0222 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hawe, E., & Dixon, H.
    (2017) Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
    (2006) Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. InK. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.013 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2019) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108635547
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547 [Google Scholar]
  29. Irizarry, J. G.
    (2017) For us, by us. InD. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp.–). Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ishii, D. N. & Soltani, B.
    (2021) Digital spaces of engagement: Perspectives on using Zoom and virtual spaces in online classrooms, inI. Fayed & J. Cummings (eds.), Teaching in the post COVID-19 era, (pp.–), Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑74088‑7_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74088-7_1 [Google Scholar]
  31. James, M., & Pedder, D.
    (2006) Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. The Curriculum Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09585170600792712
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170600792712 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kinginger, C.
    (2017) Language socialization in study abroad. InP. Duff & S. May (Eds.), Language Socialization (pp.–). Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Klenowski, V.
    (2009) Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, (), –. 10.1080/09695940903319646
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kulick, D., & Schieffelin, B. B.
    (2004) Language socialization. InA. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp.–). Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, F., & Carless, D.
    (2006) Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/13562510600680582
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582 [Google Scholar]
  37. Long, M.
    (1980) Input, Interaction and Second Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
  38. Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A.
    (1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3586827
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827 [Google Scholar]
  39. Malecka, B., Boud, D., & Carless, D.
    (2020) Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, –. 10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784 [Google Scholar]
  40. Matsuda, P. K.
    (2006) The myth of linguistic homogeneity in US college composition. College English, (), –. 10.2307/25472180
     https://doi.org/10.2307/25472180 [Google Scholar]
  41. McArthur, J.
    (2023) Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well-being, and society. Higher education, (), –. 10.1007/s10734‑022‑00822‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y [Google Scholar]
  42. Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E.
    (1994) Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587558
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587558 [Google Scholar]
  43. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J.
    (2018) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mittan, R.
    (1989) The peer review process: Harnessing students’ communicative power. InD. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp.–). Longman Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M.
    (2020) Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955 [Google Scholar]
  46. Morita, N.
    (2004) Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3588281
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588281 [Google Scholar]
  47. Morita, N., & Kobayashi, M.
    (2008) Academic discourse socialization in a second language. InN. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_210
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_210 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
    (2009) The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, (), –. 10.1007/s11251‑008‑9053‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x [Google Scholar]
  49. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D.
    (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/03075070600572090
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090 [Google Scholar]
  50. Norton, B.
    (2013) Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783090563
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090563 [Google Scholar]
  51. NZQA
    NZQA (2021) New Zealand Certificates in English Language (Levels 1–5). https://www.nzqa.govt.nz/qualifications-standards/qualifications/english-language-qualifications/
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ochs, E.
    (1988) Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Paris, D.
    (2012) Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, (), –. 10.3102/0013189X12441244
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244 [Google Scholar]
  54. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S.
    (Eds.) (2017) Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Pavlenko, A.
    (2007) Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amm008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm008 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pitt, E., & Norton, L.
    (2017) Now That’s the Feedback I Want! Students’ Reactions to Feedback on Graded Work and What They Do with It. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500 [Google Scholar]
  57. Poole, F. J. P.
    (1994) Socialization, enculturation and the development of personal identity. InT. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopedia of anthropology (pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Rassaei, E.
    (2021) Effects of dynamic and non-dynamic corrective feedback on EFL writing accuracy during dyadic and small group interactions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑0044
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0044 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rollinson, P.
    (2005) Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/cci003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003 [Google Scholar]
  60. Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L.
    (2013) Can We Meet Their Expectations? Experiences and Perceptions of Feedback in First Year Undergraduate Students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2011.629291
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.629291 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sadler, D. R.
    (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, (), –. 10.1007/BF00117714
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2009) Are we short changing our students? The use of preset criteria in assessment. TLA Interchange, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D., & van der Vleuten, C. P.
    (2021) A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, , . 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094 [Google Scholar]
  64. Seror, J.
    (2011) Alternative sources of feedback and second language writing development in university content courses. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Soltani, B.
    (2016) International students’ language socialization in New Zealand Tertiary institutions: A spatial analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. (2018) Academic socialization as the production and negotiation of social space. Linguistics and Education, , –. 10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  67. (2021a) International students’ socialization and transition experinces in high school. InT. Pham & B. Soltani (Eds.), Enhancing student education transitions and employability: From theory to practice. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003168737‑4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168737-4 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2021b) Transitioning to vocational education. InT. Pham & B. Soltani (Eds.), Enhancing student education transitions and employability: From theory to practice. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003168737‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168737-6 [Google Scholar]
  69. Soltani, B., & Loret, J. P.
    (2018) Developing capabilities at a New Zealand tertiary institution: From foreign learners to socialised international students. Scope, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Soltani, B., & Tran, L. T.
    (2021) From imagined community to imagined social space: The case of three international students. Transitions: Journal of Transient Migration, (), –. 10.1386/tjtm_00036_1
     https://doi.org/10.1386/tjtm_00036_1 [Google Scholar]
  71. Soltani, B., & Tran, L.
    (2023) Examining space, silence, and agency in language socialization of an international student in the EAP and mainstream courses. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.3164
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3164 [Google Scholar]
  72. Soltani, B., Tran, L., & Reza, A.
    (2022) Being and becoming an international student: the inter-relation between language socialization and identities. Educational Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/eduling‑2022‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2022-0004 [Google Scholar]
  73. Soltani, B., & Zhang, L. J.
    (2021) International students’ language socialization in an English-medium university: A socio-spatial lens. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, (),  – . 10.1075/aral.21035.sal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21035.sal [Google Scholar]
  74. Sung, C. C. M.
    (2023) Agency and feedback-seeking: Academic English socialization of L2 students in Hong Kong. Language and Education, (), –. 10.1080/09500782.2022.2085048
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2085048 [Google Scholar]
  75. Sutton, P.
    (2012) Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, (), –. 10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.647781 [Google Scholar]
  76. Talmy, S.
    (2010) Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics, ,  – . 10.1017/S0267190510000085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000085 [Google Scholar]
  77. Tai, J., Bearman, M., Gravett, K., & Molloy, E.
    (2023) Exploring the notion of teacher feedback literacies through the theory of practice architectures. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2021.1948967
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1948967 [Google Scholar]
  78. Tai, J. H. M., Canny, B. J., Haines, T. P., & Molloy, E. K.
    (2017) Implementing peer learning in clinical education: a framework to address challenges in the “real world”. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, (), –. 10.1080/10401334.2016.1247000
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1247000 [Google Scholar]
  79. Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M.
    (2006) Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. InK. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.004 [Google Scholar]
  80. Wette, R., & Furneaux, C.
    (2018) The academic discourse socialisation challenges and coping strategies of international graduate students entering English-medium universities. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2018.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  81. Winstone, N. E., Balloo, K., & Carless, D.
    (2022) Discipline-specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design. Higher Education, (), –. 10.1007/s10734‑020‑00632‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00632-0 [Google Scholar]
  82. Wood, J.
    (2023) Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2022.2089973
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2089973 [Google Scholar]
  83. Wu, X. M., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R.
    (2021) EFL teachers’ understanding of assessment for learning (AfL) and the potential challenges for its implementation in Chinese university EFL classes. System, , , –. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102589
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102589 [Google Scholar]
  84. Yan, Z., & Boud, D.
    (2021) Conceptualising assessment-as-learninginZ. Yan & L. Lyan (ed). Assessment as Learning: Maximising Opportunities for Student Learning and Achievement. 10.4324/9781003052081‑2
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003052081-2 [Google Scholar]
  85. Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T.
    (2017) A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091 [Google Scholar]
  86. Yan, Z., & Carless, D.
    (2022) Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431 [Google Scholar]
  87. Yin, R. K.
    (2017) Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. L.
    (2021) Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043 [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang, X. S., Zhang, L. J., Parr, J. M., & Biebricher, C.
    (2022) Exploring teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs for implementing student self-assessment of EFL writing. Frontiers in Psychology, , , –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.23053.sol
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: self-assessment ; peer feedback ; feedback literacy practices ; narrative frames ; language socialization

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error