1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Number marking in L2 English of the speakers of two classifier languages
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores the number marking challenges faced by L2 learners of English whose L1 is one of the classifier languages Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) or Bahasa Indonesia (henceforth Indonesian). It examines whether these groups differ in their marking of English number, and how the speaker’s level of proficiency, as well as linguistic factors including countability, concreteness, and determiner use, interact and influence their performance. The present study differs from previous studies in that it offers unique insights from authentic spoken data. The authors extracted 4000 tokens from the Chinese and Indonesian spoken monolog components in the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE), involving 150 Chinese-speaking and 100 Indonesian-speaking learners across beginner and intermediate proficiency; the tokens were part-of-speech tagged and annotated. Although the analysis, using mixed-effects binomial logistic regression, revealed no performance differences between the groups and no significant proficiency effects, the study found a strong relationship between ungrammatical number marking and count nouns, particularly abstract count nouns (e.g., ), as well as the absence of determiners (e.g., ). These findings confirm that learners from classifier languages face significant challenges with count nouns and that inaccurate number marking often occurs where nouns appear unmarked for number in their L1. The paper concludes with pedagogical suggestions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24006.yao
2025-03-18
2025-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.24006.yao
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/aral.24006.yao/aral.24006.yao.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24006.yao&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Athanasopoulos, P., & Kasai, C.
    (2008) Language and thought in bilinguals: The case of grammatical number and nonverbal classification preferences. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716408080053
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080053 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2011) Effects of second language on cognition in English users of L2 Japanese. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baisa, V. S.
    (2014) SkELL — Web interface for English language learning. InEighth Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing (pp.–). Tribun EU.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A.
    (2018) quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, (), . 10.21105/joss.00774
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickerton, D.
    (2015) Roots of language. Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603354
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603354 [Google Scholar]
  6. Burhansyah, B., & Whong, M.
    (2020) The acquisition of English L2 lexical and phrasal plural marking. International Journal of Language Studies, ().
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Calcagno, V.
    (2020) glmulti: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Made Easy (Version 1.0.8) [Computer software]. CRAN. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmulti
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chierchia, G.
    (2015) How universal is the mass/count distinction? Three grammars of counting. InA. Li & A. Simpson (Eds.), Chinese syntax: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0006
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chierchia, G., & Rothstein, S.
    (1998) Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter.” InS. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and Grammar (pp.–). Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Choi, S. H., & Ionin, T.
    (2021) Plural marking in the second language: Atomicity, definiteness, and transfer. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716420000569
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000569 [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi, S. H., Ionin, T., & Zhu, Y.
    (2018) L1 Korean and L1 Chinese L2 English learners’ acquisition of the count/mass distinction in English. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658317717581
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317717581 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chung, S.
    (2000) On reference to kinds in Indonesian. Natural Language Semantics, (), –. 10.1023/A:1026527925514
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026527925514 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cook, A., & Yao, D. C.
    (in press). Who says men can never change? A corpus-based study of recent changes in the use of the Chinese plural suffix men. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook, V., Bassetti, B., Kasai, C., Sasaki, M., & Takahashi, J. A.
    (2006) Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. The International Journal of Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1177/13670069060100020201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069060100020201 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crosthwaite, P. R.
    (2016) L2 English article use by L1 speakers of article-less languages A learner corpus study. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.2.1.03cro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.1.03cro [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalrymple, M., & Mofu, S.
    (2012) Plural Semantics, Reduplication, and Numeral Modification in Indonesian. Journal of Semantics, (), –. 10.1093/jos/ffr015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffr015 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deshors, S. C., & Gries, S. T.
    (2022) Using corpora in research on second language psycholinguistics. InA. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003018872‑16
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018872-16 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ekiert, M.
    (2004) Acquisition of the English article system by speakers of Polish in ESL and EFL settings. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, ().
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, N. C.
    (2006) Selective Attention and Transfer Phenomena in L2 Acquisition: Contingency, Cue Competition, Salience, Interference, Overshadowing, Blocking, and Perceptual Learning. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/aml015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2022) Second language learning of morphology. Journal of the European Second Language Association, (), –. 10.22599/jesla.85
     https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.85 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S.
    (2020) Usage-Based Approaches to L2 Acquisition. InB. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (3rd ed., pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429503986‑4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gil, D.
    (2013) Numeral classifiers. InM. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.7385533. Available online atwals.info/chapter/55 (accessed2024-06-26)
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gries, S. T.
    (2019) Ten Lectures on Corpus Linguistics with R. Brill. 10.1163/9789004410343
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410343 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall, E. T.
    (1977) Beyond culture. Anchor Press/Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hiki, M.
    (1991) A study of learners’ judgments of noun countability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.
  27. Hua, D., & Lee, T. H.-T.
    (2005) Chinese ESL learners’ understanding of the English count-mass distinction. Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp.–). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
    (2017) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Huebner, T.
    (1983) A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English. Karoma.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (1985) System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1985.tb01022.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01022.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Iljic, R.
    (1994) Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: two markers of plurality. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.91
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.91 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ishikawa, S.
    (2014) Design of the ICNALE Spoken: A new database for multi-modal contrastive interlanguage analysis. Learner Corpus Studies in Asia and the World, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jarvis, S.
    (2016) Clarifying the Scope of Conceptual Transfer. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12154
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12154 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
    (2008) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203935927
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935927 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiang, L. J.
    (2017) Mandarin associative plural -men and NPs with -men. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia [Google Scholar]
  36. Kirjavainen, M., Kite, Y., & Piasecki, A. E.
    (2020) The Effect of Language-Specific Characteristics on English and Japanese Speakers’ Ability to Recall Number Information. Cognitive Science, (), e12923–n/a. 10.1111/cogs.12923
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12923 [Google Scholar]
  37. Krashen, S. D.
    (1977) Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. InH. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. H. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’77: Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp.–). TESOL.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Langacker, R. W.
    (1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110800524
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, E., & Lardiere, D.
    (2019) Feature reassembly in the acquisition of plural marking by Korean and Indonesian bilinguals: A bidirectional study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.16018.lee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16018.lee [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, S. K.
    (2007) Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00400.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Leow, R. P., & Mercer, J. D.
    (2015) Depth of processing in L2 learning: theory, research, and pedagogy. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1080/23247797.2015.1026644
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2015.1026644 [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, Y.-H. A.
    (1999) Plurality in a Classifier Language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, (), –. 10.1023/A:1008306431442
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431442 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lucas, M.
    (2020) Cross-linguistic influence and plural marking: enhancing error recognition and written accuracy among Japanese EFL learners through web-based awareness-raising. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2020.1737096
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1737096 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lucy, J. A.
    (1992) Language diversity and thought: a reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620843
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620843 [Google Scholar]
  45. Luk, Z. P., & Shirai, Y.
    (2009) Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles, and possessive ’s. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00524.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00524.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Lyons, C.
    (1999) Definiteness. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  47. Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T.
    (2016) L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263115000352
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. S.
    (2011) Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203850961
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850961 [Google Scholar]
  49. Perdue, C.
    (Ed.) (1993) Adult language acquisition: Volume 2, The results: Cross-linguistic perspectives (Vol.). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Quirk, R.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Radden, G., & Dirven, R.
    (2007) Cognitive English Grammar. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/clip.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  53. Schweinberger, M.
    (2023) The Language Technology and Data Analysis Laboratory (LADAL) (Version2023.09.14). The University of Queensland, School of Languages and Cultures. https://slcladal.github.io/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Simard, D.
    (2022) Psycholinguistic processes in L2 oral production. InT. M. Derwing, M. J. Munro, & R. I. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003022497‑4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022497-4 [Google Scholar]
  55. Slobin, D. I.
    (1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” InJ. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Snape, N.
    (2008) Resetting the Nominal Mapping Parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count–mass distinction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728907003215
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003215 [Google Scholar]
  57. Tomioka, S.
    (2021) Japanese -tati and generalized associative plurals. InP. Cabredo Hofherr & J. Doetjes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammatical number. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795858.013.22
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795858.013.22 [Google Scholar]
  58. Tsang, A.
    (2017) Judgement of countability and plural marking in English by native and non-native English speakers. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2017.1410553
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1410553 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, J., & Schwartz, B. D.
    (2022) Detecting definiteness: On the L2 acquisition of the Mandarin plural marker -men. InYing Gong and Felix Kpogo (eds.) Proceedings of the 46th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, , –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Wijaya, D.
    (forthcoming). Promoting embodied pedagogy for instructing English number marking to speakers of classifier languages. InB. J. White & N. Dolgova Eds. Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Activities for the English Language Classroom. Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Wijffels, J.
    (2023) udpipe: Tokenization, Parts of Speech Tagging, Lemmatization and Dependency Parsing with the ‘UDPipe’ ‘NLP’ Toolkit (Version 0.8.11) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=udpipe
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24006.yao
Loading
Number marking in L2 English of the speakers of two classifier languages
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24006.yao
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24006.yao
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24006.yao
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: learner corpus ; classifier languages ; English number marking ; L1 influence ; usage-based approaches

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error