1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The impact of an online doctoral writing group
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

Challenges with writing have been identified as a key factor in the timely completion of PhD programs. Doctoral writing groups, where students provide peer feedback on drafts, are increasingly being implemented as a potential solution to support and develop student writing. This paper presents an exploration of the impact of an online doctoral writing group program at a large Australian university. The group supports students in writing a research article for publication in an academic journal and includes both facilitator-led instruction and peer feedback. We explored the group’s impact on the participants’ writing ability, feedback literacy, and general well-being. Data were drawn from two doctoral writing groups and derived from several sources: session transcripts, focus groups, anonymous surveys, student drafts, and published samples of students’ academic journal articles. We found that instruction was key to demystifying the writing process and developing feedback literacy. Furthermore, the online delivery mode provided access to support for cohorts traditionally excluded from these opportunities, as well as a safe space that fostered a sense of well-being. This approach suggests a sustainable and effective model for implementation in graduate programs.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24012.gar
2024-08-27
2024-09-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.24012.gar
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/aral.24012.gar/aral.24012.gar.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24012.gar&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aitchison, C.
    (2009) Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/03075070902785580
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902785580 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2014) Learning from multiple voices: Feedback and authority in doctoral writing groups. InC. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing Groups for Doctoral Education and Beyond (0 ed., pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203498811‑13
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203498811-13 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aitchison, C., & Lee, A.
    (2006) Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/13562510600680574
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574 [Google Scholar]
  4. Álvarez, G., Colombo, L. M., & Difabio, H.
    (2021) Peer Feedback in an Online Dissertation Writing Workshop. Signum: Estudos Da Linguagem, (), Article 1. 10.5433/2237‑4876.2021v24n1p80
     https://doi.org/10.5433/2237-4876.2021v24n1p80 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T.
    (2012) The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/03075079.2010.510182
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.510182 [Google Scholar]
  6. Badenhorst, C., & Guerin, C.
    (2015) Research Literacies and Writing Pedagogies for Masters and Doctoral Writers. BRILL. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usyd/detail.action?docID=4082138
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bao, J., & Feng, D. (William)
    (2023) Supervisory feedback and doctoral students’ academic literacy development: The case of writing for publication. Teaching in Higher Education, –. 10.1080/13562517.2023.2283727
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2283727 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beasy, K., Emery, S., Dyer, L., Coleman, B., Bywaters, D., Garrad, T., Crawford, J., Swarts, K., & Jahangiri, S.
    (2020) Writing together to foster wellbeing: Doctoral writing groups as spaces of wellbeing. Higher Education Research & Development, (), –. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1713732
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1713732 [Google Scholar]
  9. Breitenbach, E., Adler, K., & Pazdernik, V.
    (2022) Writing self-efficacy and performance among students in an online doctoral program: International Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, (), –. 10.4018/IJITLHE.304080
     https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITLHE.304080 [Google Scholar]
  10. Caffarella, R., & Barnett, B. G.
    (2000) Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Calle-Arango, L., & Ávila Reyes, N.
    (2023) Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review. Studies in Continuing Education, (), –. 10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cannell, C., Silvia, A., McLachlan, K., Othman, S., Morphett, A., Maheepala, V., McCosh, C., Simic, N., & Behrend, M. B.
    (2023) Developing research-writer identity and wellbeing in a doctoral writing group. Journal of Further and Higher Education, –. 10.1080/0309877X.2023.2217411
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2217411 [Google Scholar]
  13. Carless, D., & Boud, D.
    (2018) The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 [Google Scholar]
  14. Catterall, J., Ross, P., Aitchison, C., & Burgin, S.
    (2011) Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, (), –. 10.53761/1.8.2.7
     https://doi.org/10.53761/1.8.2.7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chakma, U., Li, B., & Kabuhung, G.
    (2021) Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues in Educational Research, (), .
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Doody, S., McDonnell, M., Reid, E., & Marshall, S. C.
    (2017) Doctoral Peer Writing Groups as a Means of Promoting Well-Being. LEARNing Landscapes, (), Article 2. 10.36510/learnland.v10i2.807
     https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v10i2.807 [Google Scholar]
  17. Flowerdew, J.
    (2015) John Swales’s approach to pedagogy in Genre Analysis: A perspective from 25 years on. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gravett, K., & Carless, D.
    (2024) Feedback literacy-as-event: Relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2023.2189162
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2189162 [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (Fourth Edition.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hands, A. S., & Tucker, V. M.
    (2022) Fostering doctoral student socialization and research expertise through writing pedagogy. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, (), –. 10.3138/jelis‑2020‑0115
     https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2020-0115 [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1985) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Deakin University.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kozar, O., & Lum, J. F.
    (2013) Factors likely to impact the effectiveness of research writing groups for off-campus doctoral students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, (), .
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (2015) Online doctoral writing groups: Do facilitators or communication modes make a difference?Quality in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/13538322.2015.1032003
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1032003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Little, T., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Tai, J.
    (2024) Can students’ feedback literacy be improved? A scoping review of interventions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2023.2177613
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2177613 [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, F., Du, J., Zhou, D. Q., & Huang, B.
    (2021) Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups. Assessing Writing, , 100482. 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lonka, K.
    (2014) How to measure PhD students’ conceptions of academic writing — and are they related to well-being?Journal of Writing Research, (), –. 10.17239/jowr‑2014.05.03.1
     https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Maher, M., Fallucca, A., & Mulhern Halasz, H.
    (2013) Write On! Through to the Ph.D.: Using writing groups to facilitate doctoral degree progress. Studies in Continuing Education, (), –. 10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381 [Google Scholar]
  28. Micciche, L. R., & Carr, A. D.
    (2011) Toward graduate-level writing instruction. College Composition and Communication, (), –. 10.58680/ccc201113457
     https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc201113457 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mullen, C. A.
    (2001) The Need for a Curricular Writing Model for Graduate Students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/03098770020030551
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770020030551 [Google Scholar]
  30. Negretti, R., & McGrath, L.
    (2020) English for specific playfulness? How doctoral students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics manipulate genre. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  31. Palmer, B., & Major, C. H.
    (2008) Using Reciprocal Peer Review to Help Graduate Students Develop Scholarly Writing Skills. Journal of Faculty Development, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., & McAlpine, L.
    (2009) The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings. InC. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a Changing World (pp.–). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press. 10.37514/PER‑B.2009.2324.2.09
     https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.09 [Google Scholar]
  33. Premawardhena, N. C.
    (2020) Defying learning traditions: From teacher-centred to student-centred foreign language education through digital transformation at Sri Lankan universities. InM. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education (Vol., pp.–). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑11932‑4_23
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_23 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rose, M., & McClafferty, K. A.
    (2001) A call for the teaching of writing in graduate education. Educational Researcher, (), –. 10.3102/0013189X030002027
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002027 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sverdlik, A. C., Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K.
    (2018) The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-Being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, , –. 10.28945/4113
     https://doi.org/10.28945/4113 [Google Scholar]
  36. Torka, M.
    (2020) Change and continuity in Australian doctoral education. ().
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang-Wu, Q.
    (2023) Exploring multilingual students’ feedback literacy in an asynchronous online writing course. Assessing Writing, , 100718. 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100718
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100718 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24012.gar
Loading
The impact of an online doctoral writing group
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24012.gar
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24012.gar
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24012.gar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: writing instruction ; doctoral writing ; academic writing ; peer feedback literacy ; wellbeing

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error