1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Chunk reading strategy training improves multiword processing by Japanese English learners
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

The Chunk-and-Pass model suggests that language acquisition involves learning to appropriately chunk language input into multiword sequences and to form more abstract linguistic representations. While the theoretical model has gained widespread attention in the language sciences, there are limited studies that adopt this model, particularly in the context of second language (L2) learning and teaching research. This study examines the effects of Chunk Reading Strategy Training (CRST), which was developed based on the model, on multiword processing in low-proficiency Japanese learners of English. A treatment group received CRST, while a control group underwent standard block-format reading training. A phrasal decision test assessed online multiword processing at pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest stages. The results indicated improvement in response times post-intervention for the treatment group, and only in the delayed posttest for the control group. This study, therefore, discusses the theoretical implications and limitations of CRST.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24019.kos
2025-02-24
2026-08-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.24019.kos
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/aral.24019.kos/aral.24019.kos.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24019.kos&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abney, S. P.
    (1991) Parsing by chunks. InR. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney, & C. Tenny (Eds.), Princople-based parsing. Springer, pp.–. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3474‑3_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3474-3_10 [Google Scholar]
  2. Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y.
    (2007) The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnon, I. & Snider, N.
    (2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language(), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, C. T., & Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. C.
    (2015a) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H.
    (2015b) Parsimonious mixed models. arXivpreprint arXiv:1506.04967. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.04967
  6. Brehm, L., & Alday, P. M.
    (2022) Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, , . 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104334
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104334 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, M., Savova, V., & Gibson, E.
    (2012) Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension. Journal of memory and language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brysbaert, M., & Debeer, D.
    (2023) How to run linear mixed effects analysis for pairwise comparisons? A tutorial and a proposal for the calculation of standardized effect sizes. PsyArXive. 10.31234/osf.io/esnku
     https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/esnku [Google Scholar]
  9. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N.
    (2016) The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, . . 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500031X [Google Scholar]
  10. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
    (2018) Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. (), –. 10.1017/S0272263117000250
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000250 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowan, N.
    (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Science, (), –. 10.1017/S0140525X01003922
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922 [Google Scholar]
  12. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2023, October6). Global scale-Table 1 (CEFR 3.3): Common reference levels. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR).
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies, M.
    (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online athttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fender, M.
    (2003) English word recognition and word integration skills of native Arabic-and Japanese-speaking learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S014271640300016X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640300016X [Google Scholar]
  16. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G.
    (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
    (2002) Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263102002097
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002097 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to arguments structure. The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (2019) Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hilpert, M.
    (2014) Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jeong, H., & DeKeyser, R.
    (2023) Development of automaticity in processing L2 collocations: The roles of L1 collocational knowledge and practice condition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, –. 10.1017/S0272263122000547
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000547 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jin, H., Ji, L., Cheung, O. S., & Hayward, W. G.
    (2024) Facilitation and interference are asymmetric in holistic face processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, –. 10.3758/s13423‑024‑02481‑9
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02481-9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jolsvai, H., McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H.
    (2020) Meaningfulness beats frequency in multiword chunk processing. Cognitive Science, (), . 10.1111/cogs.12885
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12885 [Google Scholar]
  24. Juffs, A., & Fang, S.
    (2022) A generative approach to the instructed second language acquisition of Spanish se. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12483
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12483 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jurafsky, D.
    (1996) A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1207/s15516709cog2002_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2002_1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, H., Shin, G. H., & Hwang, H.
    (2020) Integration of verbal and constructional information in the second language processing of English dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263119000743
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000743 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kosaka, T.
    (2023) The Effects of Chunk Reading Training on the Syntactic Processing Skills and Reading Spans of Japanese Learners of English. Reading in a Foreign Language, (). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/67450
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2024) The multiword processing by low-proficiency Japanese English learners: Meaningfulness and constructions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/ijal.12528
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12528 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A.
    (2013) Fluency: Developmental and Remedial Practices-Revisited. InD. A. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp.–). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2015) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315775661
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775661 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, J. C., Lovibond, P. F., Hayes, B. K., & Navarro, D. J.
    (2019) Negative evidence and inductive reasoning in generalization of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (), –. 10.1037/xge0000496
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000496 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lenth, V. R.
    (2023) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. (Version 1.8.8) [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
  33. Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I.
    (2015) The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12117
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12117 [Google Scholar]
  34. Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L.
    (2016) An A–Z of applied linguistics research methods. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑40322‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3 [Google Scholar]
  35. Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D.
    (2017) Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. McMaster, K. L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., Pinto, V., Janda, B., Lam, E., … & van Boekel, M.
    (2015) Developing a reading comprehension intervention: Translating cognitive theory to educational practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, , –. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller, G. A.
    (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, (), –. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0043158. 10.1037/h0043158
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitsugi, S., & MacWhinney, B.
    (2010) Second language processing in Japanese scrambled sentences. Research in second language processing and parsing, (), –. 10.1075/lald.53.07mit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.53.07mit [Google Scholar]
  39. Murakami, A., & Ellis, N. C.
    (2022) Effects of availability, contingency, and formulaicity on the accuracy of English grammatical morphemes in second language writing. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12500
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12500 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nagle, C.
    (2018) Motivation, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: Investigating motivation as a time-varying predictor of pronunciation development. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12461
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12461 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ortega, L.
    (2014) Understanding second language acquisition. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203777282
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203777282 [Google Scholar]
  42. Park, Y., & Warschauer, M.
    (2016) Syntactic enhancement and second language literacy: An experimental study. Language Learning & Technology, (), –. 10125/44488
     https://doi.org/10125/44488 [Google Scholar]
  43. Park, Y., Xu, Y., Collins, P., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M.
    (2019) Scaffolding learning of language structures with visual-syntactic text formatting. British Journal of Educational Technology, (), –. 10.1111/bjet.12689
     https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12689 [Google Scholar]
  44. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.1) [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computinghttps://www.R-project.org/
  45. Saito, K., Hanzawa, K., Petrova, K., Kachlicka, M., Suzukida, Y., & Tierney, A.
    (2022) Incidental and multimodal high variability phonetic training: Potential, limits, and future directions. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12503
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12503 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stoet, G.
    (2010) PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior research methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2017) PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/0098628316677643
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tate, T. P., Collins, P., Xu, Y., Yau, J. C., Krishnan, J., Prado, Y., … & Warschauer, M.
    (2019) Visual-syntactic text format: Improving adolescent literacy. Scientific Studies of Reading, (), –. 10.1080/10888438.2018.1561700
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1561700 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Treffers-Daller, J., & Calude, A.
    (2015) The role of statistical learning in the acquisition of motion event construal in a second language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2015.1027146
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1027146 [Google Scholar]
  51. Walker, S., Schloss, P., Fletcher, C. R., Vogel, C. A., & Walker, R. C.
    (2005) Visual-syntactic text formatting: A new method to enhance online reading. Reading Online, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Yamashita, J., & Ichikawa, S.
    (2010) Examining reading fluency in a foreign language: Effects of text segmentation on L2 readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Yi, W., & Zhong, Y.
    (2023) The processing advantage of multiword sequences: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, –. 10.1017/S0272263123000542
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000542 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, X., & Dong, X.
    (2019) Input frequency and construction interference interactions in L2 development. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658318791651
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318791651 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24019.kos
Loading
Chunk reading strategy training improves multiword processing by Japanese English learners
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24019.kos
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24019.kos
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24019.kos
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: multiword processing ; Chunk-and-Pass model ; construction grammar ; chunk reading strategy training ; second language

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error