1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of A study on the developmental features and stance construction of shell nouns by Chinese EFL learners
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The unique semantic characteristics of shell nouns (SNs) endow them with a rich interpersonal function in academic discourse. However, little attention has been paid to the developing features of SNs and their lexico-grammatical patterns in Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. This study bridges these gaps by tracking the progression of 15 English postgraduate students in terms of their use of SNs in academic writing across three stages. Key findings reveal: (1) objective SNs remained the prevailing choice, but significant longitudinal increase was only observed in the use of ‘meta-text’ SNs; (2) stance expressions involved fewer object nouns, which highlighted the interactive and evaluative feature of academic papers; (3) the use of anaphoric shell-noun patterns increased, reflecting an emphasized author-centric stance formation; (4) learners had a preference for the use of objective premodifiers, revealing a divergent trend from SNs. Moreover, the study exposed features in learners’ stance construction, characterized by simplicity in use, limited interactivity, and imbalance in development.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24080.wei
2025-06-02
2025-06-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.24080.wei
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V.
    (2008) Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z.
    (2014) Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0741088314527055
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baratta, A. M.
    (2010) Nominalization development across an undergraduate academic degree program. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, H. D.
    (2014) Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Charalles, M.
    (1999) Associative anaphora and its interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00070‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00070-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Charles, M.
    (2003) “This mystery…”: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/S1475‑1585(03)00048‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00048-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2007) Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the noun “that” pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, S., & Hu, Z.
    (2018) A comparative study of shell noun use in English and Chinese research articles of applied linguistics. Foreign Language Education, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chiang, Y.
    (2012) Perfectionism and EFL writing anxiety in mathematics-and-science-gifted senior high school girls. English Teaching and Learning, , –. 10.6330/ETL.2012.36.1.02
     https://doi.org/10.6330/ETL.2012.36.1.02 [Google Scholar]
  10. Crosthwaite, P., & Jiang, K.
    (2017) Does EAP affect written L2 academic stance? A longitudinal learner corpus study. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2017.06.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.010 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong, M., & Fang, A. C.
    (2021) Shell nouns as grammatical metaphor revealing disparate construals: Investigating the differences between British English and China English based on a comparable corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt‑2018‑0047
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0047 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fang, A. C., & Dong, M.
    (2021) Shell nouns as register-specific discourse devices. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.19059.fan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19059.fan [Google Scholar]
  13. Flowerdew, J.
    (2003) Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00017‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00017-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2015) Revisiting metadiscourse: Conceptual and methodological issues concerning signalling nouns. Iberica, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Flowerdew, J., & Forest, R.
    (2015) Signalling nouns in English: A corpus-based discourse approach. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139135405
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135405 [Google Scholar]
  16. Francis, G.
    (1986) Anaphoric nouns. English Language Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) Labelling discourse: An aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion. InM. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gao, Y., Li, L., & Lü, J.
    (2001) Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00015‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00015-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gray, B.
    (2010) On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gray, B., & Cortes, V.
    (2011) Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of this and these in academic prose. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (2001) Cohesion in English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hu, X., & Huang, Y.
    (2021) A comparative study on interpersonal functions of shell nouns in different moves of English abstracts of Chinese and English scientific papers. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, Y., & Rose, K.
    (2018) You, our shareholders: Metadiscourse in CEO letters from Chinese and Western banks. Text & Talk, (), –. 10.1515/text‑2017‑0041
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0041 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
    (2000) Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hunston, S., & Thompson, G.
    (2003) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyland, K.
    (2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445605050365
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
    (2005) Evaluative ‘that’ constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, (), –. 10.1075/fol.12.1.03hyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.12.1.03hyl [Google Scholar]
  28. Işık-Taş, E. E.
    (2018) Nominal stance construction in IELTS tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ivanic, R.
    (1991) Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open and close-system characteristics. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral.1991.29.2.93
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1991.29.2.93 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jiang, F.
    (2015) Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2017) Stance and voice in academic writing: The “noun+that” construction and disciplinary variation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.22.1.04jia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.1.04jia [Google Scholar]
  32. Jiang, F., & Hyland, K.
    (2015) “The fact that”: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445615590719
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615590719 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2018) Nouns and academic interactions: a neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/amw023
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw023 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2021) “The goal of this analysis …”: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing. Lingua, (), . 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lancaster, Z.
    (2016) Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin, J., & White, P. R.
    (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  37. Martı́nez, A. C. L.
    (2002) Empirical examination of EFL readers’ use of rhetorical information. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00029‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00029-6 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mauranen, A., & Marina, B.
    (2003) Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/S1475‑1585(03)00045‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00045-6 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ozkan, K., & Kirmizi, G. D.
    (2022) Nominal stance in cross-disciplinary academic writing of L1 and L2 speakers in noun+that constructions. Journal of Language and Education, (), –. 10.17323/jle.2022.12252
     https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12252 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmid, H.
    (1998) Constant and ephemeral hypostatization: Thing, problem and other shell nouns. InB. Caron (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, CD-ROM. Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. (2000) English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
  42. Selinker, L.
    (1992) Rediscovering interlanguage. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sukthanker, R., Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Thirunavukarasu, R.
    (2020) Anaphora and coreference resolution: A Review. Information Fusion, , –. 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tadros, A.
    (1994) Predictive categories in expository text. InM. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Vendler, Z.
    (1967) Linguistics in philosophy. Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501743726
     https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743726 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, Y., & Hu, G.
    (2023) Shell noun phrases in scientific writing: A diachronic corpus-based study on research articles in chemical engineering. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2023.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Winter, E. O.
    (1982) Towards a contextual grammar of English. George Allen & Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Yu, Y., & Zhou, D.
    (2022) Understanding Chinese EFL learners’ anxiety in second language writing for the sustainable development of writing skills. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010010
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010010 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhao, C. G.
    (2013) Measuring authorial voice strength in L2 argumentative writing: The development and validation of an analytic rubric. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532212456965
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456965 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zipf, G. K.
    (1949) Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24080.wei
Loading
A study on the developmental features and stance construction of shell nouns by Chinese EFL learners
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24080.wei
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24080.wei
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.24080.wei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: academic writing ; Chinese EFL learners ; shell nouns ; longitudinal study ; stance construction

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error