Focus on learnable form in a communicative context

References

1. Boss, B.
   (1996) German grammar for beginners - the Teachability Hypothesis and its relevance in the classroom. In C. ArbonesSola , J. Rolin-Ianzit & R. Sussex (Eds). Who’s afraid of teaching grammar? Papers in Language and Linguistics, 1, 93–103.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bresnan, J.
   (1982) The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Clahsen, H. , Meisel, J. & Pienemann, M.
   (1983) Deutsch als zweitsprache: der spracherwerb auslandischer arbeiter. Tubingen: Narr.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Collins, P. , Hollo, C. & Mar, J.
   (1997) English grammar in school textbooks: a critical survey. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 33–51.
   [Google Scholar]
5. DeKeyser, R.
   (1995) Learning second language grammar rules: an experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 249–297. doi: 10.1017/S027226310001425X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310001425X [Google Scholar]
6. Di Biase, B.
   (in press). L’acquisizione della morfologia dell’ italiano L2. Italiano e Scuola. 3.1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Doughty, C. & Varela, E.
   (1998) Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty . & J. Williams (Eds) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Doughty, C. & Williams, J.
   (1998a) Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty . & J. Williams (Eds) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Doughty, C. & Williams, J.
   (1998b) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty . & J. Williams (Eds) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dyson, B.
    (1996) The debate on form-focused instruction: a teacher’s perspective. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 59–77.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ellis, N.
    (1993) Rules and instances in foreign language learning: interactions of implicit and explicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 289–319. doi: 10.1080/09541449308520120
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449308520120 [Google Scholar]
12. Ellis, R.
    (1993) Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113. doi: 10.2307/3586953
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586953 [Google Scholar]
13. Fernandez, S.
    (1996) Room for two: a study of bilingual education at Bayswater South Primary School. Belconnen, ACT: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Forster, M.
    (1999) Developmental assessment principles and practice. Australian Language Matters, 7, 3, 7–9.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hakansson, G.
    (1998) Modern times in L2 Swedish: on the acquisition of Swedish morphology and syntax in formal and informal settings. In L. Diaz & C. Perez (Eds). EuroSLA 7 Proceedings (pp.39–50). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harley, B.
    (1998) The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty . & J. Williams (Eds) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Johnston, M.
    (1985) Syntactic and morphological progressions in learner English. NSW: Adult Migrant Education Service.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Johnston, M.
    (1994a) Second language acquisition: a classroom perspective. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Johnston, M.
    (1994b) Stages of the acquisition of Spanish as a Second Language. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 4.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Johnston, M.
    (2000) Stages of the acquisition of English as a Second Language. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 9.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kawaguchi, S.
    (1996) Referential choice in native speakers and learners of Japanese. MA Thesis, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M.H.
    (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition theory and research. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1989) Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lightbovvn, P , & Spada, N.
    (1990) Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (4), 429–448 doi: 10.1017/S0272263100009517
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009517 [Google Scholar]
25. Lightbovvn, P.
    (1993) Input, instruction and feedback in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 7, 2, ii–iv. doi: 10.1177/026765839100700201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700201 [Google Scholar]
26. Lightbown, P.
    (1998) The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.177–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Long, M.
    (1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds) Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Long, M.
    (1991) Focus on Form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot , D. Coste , C. Kramsch & R. Ginsberg (Eds) Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
29. Long, M. & Robinson, P.
    (1998) Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lyster, R.
    (1994) The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 263–287. doi: 10.1093/applin/15.3.263
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.3.263 [Google Scholar]
31. Mansouri, F.
    (1995) The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in Arabic as a second language. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 62–84.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Meisel, J. M. , Clahsen, C & Pienemann, M.
    (1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109–135. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004137
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004137 [Google Scholar]
33. Peterson, P.G.
    (1998) Past time reference in learner English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21 (2), 21–43.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pienemann, M.
    (1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (2), 186–214. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100005015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005015 [Google Scholar]
35. Pienemann, M.
    (1985) Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam . Pienemann, M. (Eds). Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pienemann, M.
    (1988) Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. In G. Kasper (Ed) AILA Review, 5, 40–72.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pienemann, M.
    (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 1, 52–79. doi: 10.1093/applin/10.1.52
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52 [Google Scholar]
38. Pienemann, M.
    (1995) Second language acquisition: a first introduction. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 2.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pienemann, M.
    (1998) Language processing and second language development -Processability Theory. Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
40. Pienemann, M. , Johnston, M. and Brindley, G.
    (1988) Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217–224. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007324
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007324 [Google Scholar]
41. Robinson, P.
    (1996) Learning simple and complex language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (1), 27–68. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100014674
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014674 [Google Scholar]
42. Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.
    (1993) Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205–221. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011967
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011967 [Google Scholar]
43. White, J.
    (1998) Getting the learner’s attention: a typographic input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. White, L.
    (1991) Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 12 (3), 133–161. doi: 10.1177/026765839100700205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700205 [Google Scholar]
45. Williams, J. & Evans, J.
    (1998) What kind of focus and on which forms?In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]