1887
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper draws on insights and practices of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to explore routine talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit; that is, the place of pilots’ talk as they establish what is going on around them, what they are doing, who is doing what, when they have completed what they are doing, and what they are to do next. I am interested in features of talk as pilots develop and demonstrate to one another their situated and moment-to-moment understandings in order to perform and complete the tasks necessary to fly their plane. In particular, I examine how pilots coordinate their talk and non-talk activities with split-second precision. This paper shows how pilots precisely coordinate their talk with the placement and movement of their hands as they use various cockpit controls and displays. This precise coordination may be particularly germane in the sequentially task-oriented setting of the airline cockpit, and possibly other sociotechnical workplace settings. Such coordination contributes to what the pilots can ‘know’, moment-to-moment, about the progress of their flight and their conduct of it. The outcome of a precise coordination of talk and non-talk activity is a synchronisation of the pilots’ conduct of a task, and the progress of the flight, as these are represented in talk and as they really are. This paper goes a little way towards an understanding of what it is to be, accountably and recognisably, an airline pilot, and shows how every airline flight is simultaneously and necessarily both a technological triumph and an interactional accomplishment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25.1.07nev
2002-01-01
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brumfit, C.
    (1997) Theoretical practice: applied linguistics as pure and practical science. In A. Mauranen & K. Sajavaara (Eds) Applied Linguistics across disciplines. AILA Review, 12 1995/6 (pp.18–30). Milton Keynes: AILA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Coleman, H.
    (Ed.) (1989) Working with language: a multidisciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110849226
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110849226 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cushing, S.
    (1994) Fatal words: communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Drew, P. & Heritage, J.
    (Eds) (1992) Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D.
    Eds Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174077
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077 [Google Scholar]
  6. Faith, N.
    (1998, 2nd ed). Black box. London: Boxtree.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Firth, A.
    (Ed) (1995) The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodwin, C.
    (1981) Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1986) Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62, 1, 2, 9–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1995) Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237–274. doi: 10.1177/030631295025002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025002002 [Google Scholar]
  11. (1996) Transparent vision. In E. Ochs , Schegloff, E.A. & S. A. Thompson (Eds) Interaction and grammar (pp.370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M.H.
    (1996) Seeing as a situated activity: formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds) (pp.61–95).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heath, C. & Luff, P.
    (1996) Convergent activities: line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds) (pp.96–129).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Helmreich, R.L.
    (1994) Anatomy of a system accident: the crash of Avianca flight 052. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4 (3), 265–284. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0403_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0403_4 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hutchins, E.
    (1990) The technology of team navigation. In J. Galegher , R.E. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds), Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp.191–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1991) The social organization of distributed cognition. In L.B. Resnick , J.M. Levine , & S.D. Teasley (Eds) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.283–307). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10096‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-012 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1995) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hutchins, E. & T. Klausen
    (1996) Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engeström , & D. Middleton (Eds) (pp.15–34). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hutchins, E. & Palen, L.
    (1997) Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In L.B. Resnick et al. (Eds) (pp.23–40). doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03362‑3_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Job, M.
    (1994) Air disaster. Volume1. Canberra: Aerospace Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kendon, A.
    (1990) Conducting interaction: patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lave, J.
    (1988) Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511609268
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609268 [Google Scholar]
  23. MacPherson, M.
    (1998) The black box: cockpit voice recorder accounts of inflight accidents. London: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nevile, M.
    (forthcoming). Talk, text and task in the airline cockpit. In R. Horowitz Ed Talking texts: knowing the world through instructional discourse. International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2001a) Beyond the black box: talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.
  26. (2001b) Understanding who’s who in the airline cockpit: pilots’ pronominal choices and cockpit roles. In A. McHoul , & M. Rapley (Eds) How to analyse talk in institutional settings: a casebook of methods (pp. 57–71). London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Resnick, L.B. , Levine, J.M. & Teasley, S.D.
    (Eds) (1991) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10096‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-000 [Google Scholar]
  28. Resnick, L.B. , Säljö, Pontecorvo, R.C. & Burge, B.
    (Eds) (1997) Discourse, tools, and reasoning: essays on situated cognition. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03362‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sacks, H.
    (1984) Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis (pp.21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sarangi, S. & Roberts, C.
    (Eds) (1999) Talk, work and institutional order: discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208375
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schegloff, E.A.
    (1998) Body torque. Social Research, 65, 3, 535–596.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Suchman, L.
    (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1996) Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engeström , & D. Middleton (Eds) (pp.35–60). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077.003 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1997) Centers of coordination: a case and some themes. In L.B. Resnick et al. (Eds) (pp.41–62).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25.1.07nev
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error