1887
Literacies: Tertiary contexts
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

General academic writing and discipline specific academic writing, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/aral.25.2.04kal-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25.2.04kal
2002-01-01
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buckingham, J. & Nevile, M.
    (1997) Comparing the citation choices of experienced academic writers and first year students. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice, (pp.96–107). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cadman, K.
    (1997) Thesis writing for international students: a question of identity?English for Specific Purposes, 16 (1), 3–14. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00029‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00029-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, W.
    (1985) Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. Olson , N. Torrance & A. Hildyard (Eds) Literacy, language and learning: the nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp.105–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chanock, K.
    (1997) Never say ‘I’?: the writer’s voice in essays in the humanities. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.54–63). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, H. H. & Haviland, S. E.
    (1977) Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R.O. Freedle (Ed.) Discourse production and comprehension (pp.1–40). New Jersey: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper, M. M. & Holzman, M.
    (1988) Cohesion, coherence and incoherence. In M. Cooper & M. Holzman (Eds.) Writing as social action (pp.94–108). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crompton, P.
    (1992) Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (4), 71–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Elliott, M.
    (1997) The teaching of academic discourse: collaboration between discipline lecturers and academic support staff at RMIT. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.77–87). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferguson, G.
    (1997) Literacy in the disciplines: giving academics a language to talk about language. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.161–166). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Garner, M.
    (1997) Some questions about integrated communication skills programs. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.37–41). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hallet, R.
    (1997) Promoting language skills through collaboration between content lecturers and language specialists. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.88–102). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1989) Some grammatical problems in scientific English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Genre & Systemic Functional Studies, Series5 (6), 13–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday M.A.K. & Hasan R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamp-Lyons, L.
    (1991) Writer’s knowledge and our knowledge of the writer. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp.51–67). New Jersey: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Horning, A. S.
    (1993) The psycholinguistics of readable writing. New Jersey: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Howarth, P.
    (1996) How conventional is academic writing?Review of ELT, 6 (1), 192–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ivanic, R. & Simpson, J.
    (1992) Who’s who in academic writing?In N. Fairclough (Ed.) Critical language awareness (pp.141–1730.New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaldor, S. , Herriman, M. & Rochecouste, J.
    (1997) Cross-disciplinary and discipline-specific discourse features in student academic writing. In Z. Golebiowski & H, Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.198–208). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1998) Tertiary student writing. A reportfor the collaborative ARC project ‘Framing Student Literacy: Aspects of cross-cultural communication in Australian universities’. Macquarie University, NSW: NCELTR.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff, G.
    (1972) Hedges: a study of meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. InPapers forthe Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, Vol.8. (pp.183–228). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin, J.
    (1993) Literacy in science: learning to handle texts as technology. In M.A.K. Halliday & J. R. Martin Writing science (pp.166–202). London: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Skelton, J.
    (1997) The representation of truth in academic and medical writing. Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 121–140. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.2.121
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.121 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sodowsky, R. E. & Witte, S. P.
    (1983) Topical chains in high and low-quality informative texts of college freshman. Paper presented atthe Conference on College Composition and Communication, Detroit.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Silyn-Roberts, H.
    (1997) The report and the essay: Are we muddling science and engineering undergraduates by asking them to write in two different genres?In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.) Academic communication across disciplines and cultures. Selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: research and practice (pp.240–247). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Swales, J. & Feak. C.B.
    (1994) Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills: a course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Vande Kopple, W.
    (1986) Given and new information and some aspects of the structures, semantics, and pragmatics of written texts. In C. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.) Studying writing: linguistic approaches (pp.72–111). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25.2.04kal
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error