1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 49, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 49, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper addresses issues related to the design and compilation of the first spoken corpus of youth talk in an under-represented language in corpus linguistics, Turkish. Designed to offer a maximally representative sample of Turkish youth talk, the Corpus of Turkish Youth Language (CoTY) is a 168,748-token specialised corpus within the single register of informal, naturally occurring and spontaneous interaction exclusively among friends. The speakers are Turkish-speaking youth aged 14 to 18 from diverse socio-economic backgrounds in Türkiye. In this paper, the issues that surfaced during corpus design and construction are presented, with a discussion and justification of the methodological choices in relation to the long-term project objectives. The corpus contributes to the field as a valuable resource and tool for cross-linguistic youth language research. As an overarching fundamental goal, the project also aims to expand on the cumulative linguistic and methodological knowledge in spoken corpus design and construction.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25007.efe
2025-07-28
2026-05-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.25007.efe
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adolphs, S., & Knight, D.
    (2010) Building a spoken corpus. InA. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp.38–52). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aijmer, K.
    (2020) That’s well good: A re-emergent intensifier in current British English. Journal of English Linguistics, 49(1), 18–38. 10.1177/0075424220979143
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424220979143 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ancarno, C.
    (2020) Corpus-assisted discourse studies. InA. de Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108348195.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348195.009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, G.
    (1997) They like wanna see like how we talk and all that. The use of like as a discourse marker in London teenage speech. InM. Ljung (Ed.), Corpus-based studies in English (pp.37–48). Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653641_005
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653641_005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Androutsopoulos, J.
    (2007) Style online: Doing hip-hop on the German-speaking Web. InP. Auer (Ed.), Style and social identities: Alternative approaches to linguistic heterogeneity (pp.279–317). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110198508.2.279
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198508.2.279 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, P. & Egbert, J.
    (Eds.) (2016) Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315724812
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724812 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., & Torgersen, E.
    (2011) Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 151–96. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00478.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Dorleijn, M., Mous, M., & Nortier, J.
    (2015) Urban youth styles in Kenya and the Netherlands. InJ. Nortier & B. A. Svendsen (Eds.), Language, youth and identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic practices across urban spaces (pp.271–89), Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061896.019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061896.019 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S.
    (2018) Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on- and offline. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑61955‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61955-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Drange, E.-M.
    (2009) Anglicisms in the informal speech of Norwegian and Chilean adolescents. InA.-B. Stenström, & A. M. Jørgensen (Eds.), Youngspeak in a multilingual perspective (pp.161–75). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.184.12dra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.184.12dra [Google Scholar]
  12. Drummond, R.
    (2016) (Mis)interpreting urban youth language: White kids sounding black?Journal of Youth Studies, 20(5), 640–60. 10.1080/13676261.2016.1260692
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1260692 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2018) Maybe it’s a grime [t]ing. TH-stopping in urban British youth. Language in Society, 47(2), 171–96. 10.1017/S0047404517000999
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000999 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2020) Teenage swearing in the UK. English World-wide, 41(1), 59–88. 10.1075/eww.00040.dru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00040.dru [Google Scholar]
  15. Enghels, R., De Latte, F., & Roels, L.
    (2020) El Corpus Oral de Madrid (CORMA): Materiales para el estudio (socio)lingüístico del español coloquial actual. Zeitschrift für Katalanistik, 331, 45–76. 10.46586/ZfK.2020.45‑76
     https://doi.org/10.46586/ZfK.2020.45-76 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flowerdew, L.
    (2008) Corpora and context in professional writing. InV. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp.115–127). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2008) ‘On MSN with buff boys’: Self- and other-identity claims in the context of small stories. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(5), 597–626. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00384.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00384.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Georgakopoulou, A., & Charalambidou, A.
    (2011) Doing age and ageing- language, discourse and social interaction. InA. Aijmer & G. Andersen (Eds.), Pragmatics of Society (pp.31–52). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214420.31
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420.31 [Google Scholar]
  19. Goedertier, W., Goddijn, S., & Martens, J.
    (2000) Orthographic transcription of the Spoken Dutch Corpus. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation (pp.909–14). European Language Resources Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Groff, C., Hollington, A., Hurst-Harosh, E., Nassenstein, N., Nortier, J., Pasch, H. & Yannuar, N.
    (2022) Global Perspectives on Youth Language Practices. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501514685
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501514685 [Google Scholar]
  21. Harissi, M., Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A.
    (2012) The Performative Fixing and Unfixing of Subjectivities, Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 524–543. 10.1093/applin/ams053
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams053 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hasund, I. K., & Stenström, A.-B.
    (1997) Conflict talk: A comparison of the verbal disputes of adolescent females in two corpora. InM. Ljung (Ed.), Corpus-based studies in English (pp.119–33), Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653641_010
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653641_010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ilbury, C.
    (2022a) Discourses of social media amongst youth: An ethnographic perspective. Discourse, Context, and Media, 481. 10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100625
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100625 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2022b) U Ok Hun?: The digital commodification of white woman style. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(2), 159–164. 10.1111/josl.12563
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12563 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jasanoff, S. S.
    (2003) Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223–44. 10.1023/A:1025557512320
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jonsson, R.
    (2018) Swedes can’t swear: Making fun at a multiethnic secondary school. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 17(5), 320–35. 10.1080/15348458.2018.1469412
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2018.1469412 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jørgensen, A. M.
    (2007) COLA: Un corpus oral de lenguaje adolescente. Orali, 31, 225–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. (2013) Spanish teenage language and the COLAm-corpus. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 151–66. 10.15845/bells.v3i1.368
     https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v3i1.368 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jufri, S. & Sun, C.
    (2022) Keywords Analysis. v1.0. Australian Text Analytics Platform. Software. https://github.com/Australian-Text-Analytics-Platform/keywords-analysis
  31. Kerswill, P. & Williams, A.
    (2005) New towns and koineization: linguistic and social correlates. Linguistics, 43(5), 1023–1048. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.5.1023
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.5.1023 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kilgarriff, A., Rundell, M., & Dhonnchadha, E. U.
    (2006) Efficient Corpus Development for Lexicography: Building the New Corpus for Ireland. Language Resources and Evaluation, 40(2), 127–152. www.jstor.org/stable/30200564
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kotsinas, U.-B.
    (1988) Immigrant children’s Swedish: A new variety?Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 91, 129–140. 10.1080/01434632.1988.9994324
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1988.9994324 [Google Scholar]
  34. Love, R., & Stenström, A-B.
    (2023) Corpus-pragmatic perspectives on the contemporary weakening of fuck: The case of teenage British English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 2161, 167–181. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  35. Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V. & McEnery, T.
    (2017) The Spoken BNC2014: designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C.
    (1985) The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language (12)21, 271–269. 10.1017/S0305000900006449
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900006449 [Google Scholar]
  37. Madsen, L. M.
    (2015) Fighters, girls and other identities: Sociolinguistics in a martial arts club. Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.26932013
     https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26932013 [Google Scholar]
  38. Marchi, A. & Taylor, C.
    (2018) Introduction. InC. Taylor and A. Marchi (Eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp.1–15). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315179346‑1
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179346-1 [Google Scholar]
  39. McEnery, T., & Wilson, A.
    (2001) Corpus linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Moore, E.
    (2004) Sociolinguistic Style: A Multidimensional Resource for Shared Identity Creation. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 49(3), 375–396. 10.1017/S0008413100003558
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100003558 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nørreby, T. R., & Møller, J. S.
    (2015) Ethnicity and social categorization in on- and offline interaction among Copenhagen adolescents. Discourse, Context & Media, 81, 46–54. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nortier, J.
    (2016) Characterizing urban youth speech styles in Utrecht and on the Internet. Journal of Language Contact, 9(1), 163–85. 10.1163/19552629‑00901007
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-00901007 [Google Scholar]
  43. Nortier, J. & Svendsen, B.
    (Eds.) (2015) Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061896
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061896 [Google Scholar]
  44. Palacios Martínez, I. M.
    (2018) ‘Help me move to that, blood’. A corpus-based study of the syntax and pragmatics of vocatives in the language of British teenagers. Journal of Pragmatics, 1301, 33–50. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Palacios Martínez, I. M., & Núñez Pertejo, P.
    (2014) Strategies used by English and Spanish teenagers to intensify language: A contrastive corpus-based study. Spanish in Context, 11(2), 175–201. 10.1075/sic.11.2.02pal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.11.2.02pal [Google Scholar]
  46. Partington, A.
    (2004) Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. InA. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.) Corpora and Discourse (pp.11–20). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Pharao, N., Maegaard, M., Møller, J. S., & Kristiansen, T.
    (2014) Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society, 43(1), 1–31. 10.1017/S0047404513000857
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000857 [Google Scholar]
  48. Quist, P., & Svendsen, B. A.
    (2010) Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New linguistic practices. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847693143
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693143 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rampton, B.
    (1995) Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. (2006) Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2011) From ‘Multi-ethnic adolescent heteroglossia’ to ‘Contemporary urban vernaculars’. Language & Communication, 31(4), 276–94. 10.1016/j.langcom.2011.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2015) Contemporary urban vernaculars. InJ. Nortier, & B. A. Svendsen (Eds.), Language, youth and identity in the 21st century. Linguistic practices across urban spaces (pp.25–44). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061896.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061896.003 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rehbein, I., Schalowski, S., & Wiese, H.
    (2014) The KiezDeutsch Korpus (KiDKo) Release 1.0. InProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp.367–375). European Language Resources Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Rehbein, J., Schmidt, T., Meyer, B., Watzke, F. & Herkenrath, A.
    (2004) Handbuch für das computergestützte Transkribieren nach HIAT. In: Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit, Folge B (56). www1.uni-hamburg.de/exmaralda/files/azm_56.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Rodríguez-González, F., & Stenström, A.-B.
    (2011) Expressive devices in the language of English and Spanish-speaking youth. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 241, 235–56. 10.14198/raei.2011.24.10
     https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2011.24.10 [Google Scholar]
  56. Roels, L., & Enghels, R.
    (2020) Age-based variation and patterns of recent language change: A case-study of morphological and lexical intensifiers in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 1701, 125–38. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  57. Roels, L., De Latte, F., & Enghels, R.
    (2021) Monitoring 21st-Century real-time language change in Spanish youth speech. Languages, 6(4), 162. 10.3390/languages6040162
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040162 [Google Scholar]
  58. Roulet, E.
    (1980) Interactional markers in dialogue. Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 224–33. 10.1093/applin/1.3.224
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.3.224 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ruhi, Ş.
    (2013) Interactional markers in Turkish: A corpus based perspective. Journal of Linguistics and Literature, (10)21, 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Ruhi, Ş., Hatipoğlu, Ç., Işık-Güler, H., & Eröz-Tuğa, B.
    (2010a) A guideline for transcribing conversations for the construction of Spoken Turkish Corpora using EXMARaLDA and HIAT. Setmer Yayıncılık.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruhi, Ş., Hatipoğlu, Ç., Eröz-Tuğa, B., Işık-Güler, H., Acar, G., Eryılmaz, K., Can, H., Karakaş, Ö. and Çokal-Karadaş, D.
    (2010b, May). Sustaining a Corpus for Spoken Turkish Discourse: Accessibility and Corpus Management Issues. [Paper presentation] Language Resources: From Storyboard to Sustainability and LR Lifecycle Management Workshop, Malta.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Rymes, B., & Leone, A. R.
    (2014) Citizen Sociolinguistics: A new media methodology for understanding language and social life. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 29(2), 25–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K.
    (2014) EXMARaLDA. InT. Schmidt (Ed.), Handbook on Corpus Phonology (pp.402–19). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Schneider, C., Brittan, D., Hodel, T., Hess, D. & Linder, A.
    (2021) JuBe — Jugendsprache Schweiz Korpus (1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.5648157
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5648157 [Google Scholar]
  65. Selvi, A. F.
    (2011) World Englishes in the Turkish sociolinguistic context. World Englishes, 30(2), 182–199. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2011.01705.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01705.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B. V., Krasny, M. E., & Bonney, R.
    (2012) Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). 10.5751/ES‑04705‑170229
     https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M.
    (1992) Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Sinclair, J.
    (1996) Corpus typology: Guidelines for encoding and documentation of linguistic corpora. https://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/corpustyp/node12.html
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2020) Corpus linguistics: A guide to the methodology. Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Steingrímsson, S., Helgadóttir, S., Rögnvaldsson, K., Barkarson, S., & Guðnason, J.
    (2018) Risamálheild: A Very Large Icelandic Text Corpus. InProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp.4361–66). European Language Resources Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G., & Hasund, I. K.
    (2002) Trends in teenage talk. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scl.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.8 [Google Scholar]
  72. Stenström, A.-B.
    (1997) Can I have a chips please? — Just tell me what one you want: Nonstandard grammatical features in London teenage talk. InJ. Aarts (Ed.), Studies in English language and teaching (pp.141–52). Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653351_011
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653351_011 [Google Scholar]
  73. (1998) From sentence to discourse: Cos (because) in teenage talk. InA. Jucker & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (pp.127–46). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.08ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.08ste [Google Scholar]
  74. (2005) It is very good eh– Está muy bien eh. Teenagers’ use of tags — London and Madrid compared. InK. McCafferty, Tove Bull, & K. Killie (Eds.), Contexts — historical, social, linguistic. Studies in celebration of Toril Swan (pp.279–91). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. (2014) Teenage talk: From general characteristics to the use of pragmatic markers in a contrastive perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137430380
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137430380 [Google Scholar]
  76. Stenström, A.-B., & Jørgensen, A. M.
    (2008) A question of politeness? A contrastive study of phatic language in teenage conversation. Pragmatics, 18(4), 636–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G., & Hasund, I.-K.
    (2002) Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus compilation, analysis and findings. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.8 [Google Scholar]
  78. Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G., Hasund, K., Monstad, K., & Aas, H.
    (1998) User’s Manual to Accompany The Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language (COLT). University of Bergen.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Strenström, A.-B.
    (2013) Youngspeak: Spanish vale and English okay. InK. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), Advances in Corpus-based Contrastive Linguistics (pp.127–139). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.54.08ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.54.08ste [Google Scholar]
  80. Svendsen, B. A.
    (2018) The dynamics of citizen sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 22(2), 137–60. 10.1111/josl.12276
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12276 [Google Scholar]
  81. Svendsen, B. A., & Røyneland, U.
    (2008) Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(1–2), 63–83. 10.1177/13670069080120010501
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069080120010501 [Google Scholar]
  82. TÜAD
    TÜAD (2012) Ses 2012 Lansman Toplantısı. TÜAD.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. TurkStat
    TurkStat (2023) Youth in Statistics. RetrievedApril 1, 2024. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Youth-in-Statistics-2022-49670&dil=2
  84. Tüzün, S.
    (2000) Kentsel Türkiye hane ve bireyleri için bir tabakalaşma modeli olarak veri sosyo ekonomik statü indeksi. InF. Atacan, F. Ercan, H. Kurtuluş, & M. Türkay (Eds.), Mübeccel Kıray için yazılar (pp.371–85). Bağlam.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25007.efe
Loading
Compiling the first spoken corpus for Turkish youth talk
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 49, 58 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25007.efe
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25007.efe
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25007.efe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): corpus construction; corpus design; spoken corpus; Turkish; youth talk

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error