1887
image of The path to professionalism

Abstract

Abstract

This paper outlines the changing functions of language testing and assessment from the era of the White Australia policy to the present day. Key contributors to the academic and professional status of the field are identified along with influential tests and assessment frameworks emerging from particular policy contexts. Attention is drawn to the expanding scope of the discipline, which now encompasses diverse domains of language use and demonstrates a growing social consciousness. Australian accomplishments in language testing and assessment are now recognized both locally and internationally as central to the field of applied linguistics and as playing a critical contribution to fairness and equity in the broader educational and political context.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25030.eld
2025-10-28
2025-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/aral.25030.eld/aral.25030.eld.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25030.eld&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Angelo, D.
    (2021) Countering misrecognition of Indigenous contact languages and their ecologies. PhD dissertation: Australian National University.
  2. Brindley, G. & Wigglesworth, G.
    (1997) Access: issues in language test design and delivery. National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brindley, G.
    (1998) Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning programmes: a review of the issues. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/026553229801500103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500103 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2001) Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/026553220101800405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800405 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, A.
    (2003) Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1191/0265532203lt242oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt242oa [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, A. & Hill, K.
    (1998) Interviewer style and candidate performance in the IELTS oral interview. InWoods, S. (Ed.) IELTS Research Reports, Volume. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/ielts-web-static/production/Research/interviewer-style-candidate
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, A., Iwashita, N., McNamara, T.
    (2005) An examination of rater orientations and test-taker performance on English-for-academic-purposes speaking tasks. ETS Research Report Series, Volume, Issue. 10.1002/j.2333‑8504.2005.tb01982.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2005.tb01982.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Creagh, S.
    (2016) Understanding the politics of categories in reporting national test results. National testing in schools: an Australia assessment. (pp.–) InLingard, B., Thompson, G. & Sellar, S. (Eds.) National Testing in Schools. Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315659312‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659312-9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, A.
    (1997) Introduction: the limits of ethics in language testing. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/026553229701400301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400301 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies, A. & Elder, C.
    (2005) Validity and validation in language testing. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.–). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Evans, R., Grove, E., Iwashita, N., O’Shannassy, C., Lumley, T., McNamara, T.
    (1996) Mark my Words: Assessing Second and Foreign Language Skills. 6-part video series. Multimedia Production Unit, The University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., McNamara, T.
    (1999) Dictionary of Language Testing. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Davison, C.
    (2021) Enhancing teacher assessment literacy: one approach to improving teacher knowledge and skills in Australia. InXhu, X. & Song, H. (Eds.) Envisioning teaching and learning of teachers for excellence and equity in education: Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education. Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑16‑2802‑3_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2802-3_3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dooley, K. & Moore, H.
    (2009) Penny McKay 1948–2009: A leader in English language educationTESOL in Context,: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Elder, C.
    (1997) What does test bias have to do with fairness?Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/026553229701400304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400304 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017) Language assessment in higher education. Language testing and assessment, –. InShohamy, E. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 7 Language testing and assessment. Third Edition. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02261‑1_35
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_35 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2016) Exploring the limits of authenticity in LSP testing: The case of a specific-purpose language test for health professionals. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532215607397
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215607397 [Google Scholar]
  18. Elder, C., McNamara, T., Woodward-Kron, R., Manias, E., McColl, G., Webb, G.
    (2013) Towards improved healthcare communication. Development and validation of language proficiency standards for non-native English-speaking health professionals. University of Melbourne: Language Testing Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Elder, C. & Read, J.
    (2015a) Post-entry language assessments in Australia. InRead, J.Assessing English Proficiency for University Study. Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9781137315694_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315694_2 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2015b) Post-entry language assessments in other countries. InRead, J.Assessing English Proficiency for University Study. Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Elder, C. & Zammit, S.
    (1992) Assessing performance in languages other than English: the contribution of the Australian Language Certificates. Vox: Journal of the Australian Advisory Council on Languages and Multicultural Education (ACCLAME), , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fan, J. & Knoch, U.
    (2019) Fairness in language assessment: What can the Rasch model offer?Papers in Language Testing and Assessment(). 10.58379/JRWG5233
    https://doi.org/10.58379/JRWG5233 [Google Scholar]
  23. Frost, K., & McNamara, T.
    (2018) Language tests, language policy, and citizenship. InJ. W. Tollefson & M. Pérez-MIlans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamp-Lyons & Lumley
    (2001) Assessing language for specific purposes. Language Testing(), –. 10.1177/026553220101800201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800201 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hawthorne, L.
    (1997) The political dimension of language testing in Australia. Language Testing():–. 10.1177/026553229701400303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400303 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hill, K., & McNamara, T.
    (2012) Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroom-based assessment. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532211428317
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211428317 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hudson, C., & Angelo, D.
    (2014) Concepts underpinning innovations to second language proficiency scales inclusive of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander learners: a dynamic process in progress. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, (), –. 10.58379/WLRV4810
    https://doi.org/10.58379/WLRV4810 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ingram, D. E.
    (1976) The ASLPR: Its origins and current developments. (p.) Paper presented at theNLLIA Language Expo ’96, Brisbane. 10.3316/ielapa.970302944
    https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.970302944 [Google Scholar]
  29. Knoch, U.
    (2011) Investigating the effectiveness of individualized feedback to rating behavior — a longitudinal study. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532210384252
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210384252 [Google Scholar]
  30. Knoch, U., & Chapelle, C. A.
    (2018) Validation of rating processes within an argument-based framework. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532217710049
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710049 [Google Scholar]
  31. Knoch, U. & Elder, C.
    (2009) Development and validation of the Academic English Screening Test (AEST). University of Melbourne: Language Testing Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2013) A framework for validating post-entry language assessments (PELAs). Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, , , –. https://www.altaanz.org/uploads/5/9/0/8/5908292/4_knoch_elder.pdf. 10.58379/YZLQ8816
    https://doi.org/10.58379/YZLQ8816 [Google Scholar]
  33. Knoch, U., Elder, C., Woodward-Kron, R., Flynn, E., Manias, E., McNamara, T., Zhang, B., Huisman, A.
    (2017) Towards improved quality of written patient records: development and validation of language proficiency standards for writing for non-native English speaking health professionals. Melbourne: Language Testing Research Centre, University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Knoch, U., McNamara, T., Elder, C.
    (2017) Submission to the Australian Government Department of Immigration and Border Protection on the discussion paper ‘Strengthening the test for the Australian citizenship’. Melbourne: Language Testing Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Knoch, U. & Macqueen, S.
    (2017) Assessment in the L2 classroom. InLoewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-11 [Google Scholar]
  36. Knoch, U. & Macqueen
    (2019) Assessing English for Professional Purposes: Language and the workplace. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429340383
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340383 [Google Scholar]
  37. Iwashita, N., McNamara, T. and Elder, C.
    (2001) Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information-processing approach to task design. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00160
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00160 [Google Scholar]
  38. LoBianco, J.
    (1987) National Policy on Languages. Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, pp.–, –, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lumley, T.
    (2002) Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: what do they really mean to the raters?Language Testing, (), –. 10.1191/0265532202lt230oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt230oa [Google Scholar]
  40. McKay, P.
    (1995) Developing ESL proficiency descriptions for the school context: The NLLIA ESL Bandscales. InG. Brindley (Ed.), Language assessment in action (pp.–). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. McKay, P., & Scarino, A.
    (1992) The ESL Framework of Stages. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. McNamara, T.
    (1990) Assessing the second language proficiency of health professionals. Unpublished PhD thesis: The University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (1996) Measuring second language performance. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2009) Australia: the dictation test redux?Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434300802606663
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300802606663 [Google Scholar]
  45. McNamara, T., Knoch, U., Fan, J.
    (2019) Fairness, Justice and Language Assessment. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. McNamara, T. & Roever, C.
    (2006) Language testing: the social dimension. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. McNamara, T., & Ryan, K.
    (2011) Fairness versus justice in language testing: the place of English literacy in the Australian citizenship test. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2011.565438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565438 [Google Scholar]
  48. O’Hagan, S.
    (2014) Variability in Assessor Responses to Undergraduate Essays An Issue for Assessment Quality in Higher Education. Peter Lang Gmbh, Internationaler Verlag Der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Loughlin, K.
    (2011) The interpretation and use of proficiency test scores in university selection: how valid and ethical are they?Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2011.564698
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.564698 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pill, J.
    (2016) Drawing on indigenous criteria for more authentic assessment in a specific-purpose language test: Health professionals interacting with patients. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532215607400
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215607400 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pill, J., & Harding, L.
    (2013) Defining the language assessment literacy gap: Evidence from a parliamentary inquiry. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532213480337
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480337 [Google Scholar]
  52. Roever, C. & Wigglesworth, G.
    (Eds.) (2019) Social perspectives on language testing. Peter Lang. 10.3726/b15199
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b15199 [Google Scholar]
  53. Scarino, A., Vale, P., McKay, P., & Clark, J.
    (1988) Australian Language Levels. Canberra: Curriculum Development Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Scarino, A., & Elder, C.
    (Eds.) (2012) Describing school achievement in Asian languages for diverse learner groups [Special issue]. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, ().
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wigglesworth, G., Simpson, J., Loakes, D.
    (2010) Naplan language assessments for indigenous children in remote communities: issues and problems. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/aral.34.3.04wig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.3.04wig [Google Scholar]
  56. York, B.
    (1996) White Australia and the dictation test. Voices: The Quarterly Journal of the National Library of Australia, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25030.eld
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error