1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Pragmatic flexibility in Australian learners’ Korean apology strategies
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

This study explores the pragmatic competence of Australian learners of Korean as a foreign language (KFL) by analysing their apology strategies across varying settings. While previous studies have examined Korean learners’ use of honorifics, few have focused on how L2 learners from non-honorific language backgrounds, such as Australian learners, pragmatically interpret and apply the Korean honorific system in context-specific speech acts like apologies. The current research focuses on KFL learners’ comprehension and expression of politeness in Korean by examining how they utilise honorifics and speech levels in the act of apologies for different interlocutors in the provided setting of role-plays. Findings indicate that learners tend to accommodate elevated speech levels and deferential first-person pronouns when apologising, even in contexts in which native speakers would only use the casual speech level and plain first-person pronoun. It suggests that L2 Korean learners understand the Korean honorific system as an extended and flexible pragmatic resource they can apply across contexts to achieve interpersonal goals, deviating from the sociopragmatic norms of native Korean speakers where honorific levels are strictly and invariably determined by interlocutors’ social relationships based on relative ages between speakers. By investigating how Australian KFL learners negotiate the use of honorifics according to their interpretation of politeness in Korean, this study aims to provide insights into the development of pragmatic competence and sociopragmatic awareness in L2 Korean learning and teaching within the Australian context.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25044.lee
2026-06-12
2026-07-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.25044.lee
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/aral.25044.lee/aral.25044.lee.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25044.lee&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
    (2010) Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barron, A.
    (2003) Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context (Vol.). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.108
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.108 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.
    (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E.
    (1984) Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/5.3.196
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, L.
    (2011) Korean honorifics and politeness in second language learning. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.206
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.206 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2013) Teaching ‘casual’ and/or ‘impolite’ language through multimedia: The case of non-honorific panmal speech styles in Korean. Language, Culture and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908318.2012.745551
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.745551 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2015a) Honorifics and politeness. InL. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp.–). Wiley. 10.1002/9781118371008.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118371008.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2015b) Revisiting “polite” –yo and “deferential” –supnita speech style shifting in Korean from the viewpoint of indexicality. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, L., & Yeon, J.
    (2015) Varieties of contemporary Korean. InL. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp.–). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/9781118371008.ch26
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118371008.ch26 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  11. Byon, A. S.
    (2004) Sociopragmatic analysis of Korean requests: Pedagogical settings. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, (), –. 10.1515/PR.2006.013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.013 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2015) Second language acquisition: Pragmatics. InL. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp.–). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118371008.ch22
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118371008.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cho, C.
    (1980) Pragmatics and rules of politeness. Language Research, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (1986) Kongsonuy coken [Conditions on politeness] Yengeyengmwunhak, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cho, T.
    (2011) Gender inequality of address terms and honorific usages in the conjugal relations. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Choi, H. K.
    (2002) A study of politeness in Korean requests. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen, A. D.
    (1997) Developing pragmatic ability: Insights from the accelerated study of Japanese. InH. M. Cook, K. Hijirida, & M. Tahara (Eds.), New trends and issues in teaching Japanese language and culture (pp.–). University of Hawaii Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Eun, J. O., & Strauss, S.
    (2004) The primacy of information status in the alternation between deferential and polite forms in Korean public discourse. Language Sciences, (), –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2003.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Europarat
    Europarat (Ed.) (2010) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (10th print). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.
    (2018) Role plays. InA. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110424928‑012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-012 [Google Scholar]
  22. Geçkin, V.
    (2025) The realization of apologies in a second language. Language and Dialogue, (), –. 10.1075/ld.00194.gec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00194.gec [Google Scholar]
  23. Goddard, C.
    (2009) Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics, () –. 10.1515/IPRG.2009.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hatfield, H., & Hahn, J.-W.
    (2011) What Korean apologies require of politeness theory. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.028
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.028 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haznedar, B.
    (2010) Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658310365780
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310365780 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hijirida, K., & Sohn, H.
    (1986) Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistic sensitivity to honorific variables: Evidence from English, Japanese, and Korean. Papers in Linguistics, (), –. 10.1080/08351818609389264
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818609389264 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hinkel, E.
    (2001) Building awareness and practical skills for cross-cultural communication in ESL/EFL. InM. Celce-Murica (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.–). Heinle & Heinle.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Holmes, J.
    (1990) Apologies in New Zealand English. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404500014366
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014366 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hur, S.
    (2010) Hankwuke kongsonphyohyenuy hwayongloncek yenkwu [A pragmatic study on expression of politeness in Korean]. Pusan National University.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ishihara, N.
    (2019) Understanding English language learners’ pragmatic resistance. InX. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp.–). Springer International Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D.
    (2021) Adapting textbooks for teaching pragmatics. InN. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen, Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (2nd ed., pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ishihara, N., & Tarone, E.
    (2009) Subjectivity and pragmatic choice in L2 Japanese: Emulating and resisting pragmatic norms. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp.–). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218558.101
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218558.101 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jeon, E.
    (2020) A study on impolite expressions in refusal speech acts from Korean learners. Journal of Korean Language Education, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jeon, J.
    (2007) The aspect of politeness strategy in the request speech act. Korean Language Research, , –. 10.16876/klrc.2007..21.247
     https://doi.org/10.16876/klrc.2007..21.247 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jeong, W., & Lee, N.
    (2022) Understanding of Korean honorifics by L2 Korean learners in Australia: A socio-pragmatic perspective. Language Research, (), –. 10.30961/lr.2022.58.3.223
     https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2022.58.3.223 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R.
    (2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kecskés, I.
    (2014) Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kiaer, J., Choi, N., Driggs, D., & Park, M.-J.
    (2019) The roles of age, gender and setting in Korean half-talk shift. Discourse and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim, A. H.
    (2011) Politeness in Korea. InD. Z. Kadar & S. Mills (Eds.), Politeness in East Asia (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.010 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, H.
    (2008) The semantic and pragmatic analysis of South Korean and Australian English apologetic speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim, J.-Y.
    (2023) Korean speech styles and Finnish terms of address from the perspective of KFL learners. Korean Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/kl.20004.kim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.20004.kim [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, S.
    (2013) The realizations of politeness in Korean speech acts. Korean Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim, Y.
    (2012) Noun classes and subject honorification in Korean. Linguistic Research, (), –. 10.17250/khisli.29.3.201212.005
     https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.29.3.201212.005 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ko, Y., & Nam, K.
    (1985) Standard Korean grammar [Phyocwunkwukemwunpep]. Thapchwulphansa.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Koo, H. J.
    (2004) A study on aspects of politeness strategy. Discourse and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kwon, N., & Shin, G.-H.
    (2025) Overgeneralization of Korean subject honorification by English-speaking learners of Korean. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Lan, N. T. N., & Kim, K.
    (2022) A comparative analysis study on the use of Korean refusal speech acts strategies by Korean native speakers and Vietnamese Korean learners. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture, (), –. 10.15652/ink.2022.19.3.261
     https://doi.org/10.15652/ink.2022.19.3.261 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee, H.
    (2022) Suggestions for politeness theory based on Korean social culture. Korean Semantics, , –. 10.19033/sks.2022.12.78.383
     https://doi.org/10.19033/sks.2022.12.78.383 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, I., & Ramsey, S. R.
    (2000) The Korean language. State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee, J.
    (2006) On the studies of Korean honorifics from the sociolinguistic standpoint. Journal of Korea Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee, M., Huh, S., & O’Grady, W.
    (2017) Korean subject honorifics: An experimental study. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, N.
    (2022) The pragmatic understanding of subject expression in spoken Korean: Interpersonal effects of the alternation among reference forms for the expressed subject. East Asian Pragmatics, (). 10.1558/eap.18812
     https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.18812 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2024) Korean speaker’s perception of (im)politeness across speech acts of agreement, compliment, disagreement and criticism. Linguistic Research, (Special Edition), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. (2025) ‘What happened to the un-omitted subjects?’: Variation in referential choices for first and second person subjects in spoken Korean. Pragmatics and Society. 10.1075/ps.20022.lee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20022.lee [Google Scholar]
  55. Leech, G.
    (2014) The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  56. LoCastro, V.
    (2001) Individual differences in second language acquisition: Attitudes, learner subjectivity, and L2 pragmatic norms. System, (), –. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(00)00046‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00046-4 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mao, T., & He, S.
    (2021) An integrated approach to pragmatic competence: Its framework and properties. SAGE Open, (), . 10.1177/21582440211011472
     https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472 [Google Scholar]
  58. Norton, B.
    (2013) Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Park, S.
    (2017) A study on the issue of Korean politeness research -focusing on literature reviews-. The Language and Culture, (), –. 10.18842/klaces.2017.13.4.3
     https://doi.org/10.18842/klaces.2017.13.4.3 [Google Scholar]
  60. Park, S. Y.
    (2022) A theoretical inquiry into the possibility and direction of intercultural politeness research -focusing on the limitations of B&L(1987)’s politeness theory-. The Language and Culture, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Purpura, J. E.
    (2004) Assessing grammar (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733086
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733086 [Google Scholar]
  62. Robinson, J. D.
    (2004) The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rose, K. R.
    (1999) Teachers and students learning about requests in Hong Kong. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Shin, M.
    (2017) An exploratory study on politeness strategies in requests by Korean learners of English and American English speakers. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Papers, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Siegal, M.
    (1995) Individual differences and study abroad: Women learning Japanese in Japan. InB. F. Freed (Ed.), Studies in bilingualism (Vol., pp. –). John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/sibil.9.14sie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.9.14sie [Google Scholar]
  66. Sohn, H.
    (1981) Power and solidarity in the Korean language. Papers in Linguistics, (), –. 10.1080/08351818109370546
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818109370546 [Google Scholar]
  67. (1999) The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. (2001) The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Strauss, S., & Eun, J. O.
    (2005) Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.611
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.611 [Google Scholar]
  70. Thomas, J.
    (1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/4.2.91
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91 [Google Scholar]
  71. Weedon, C.
    (1997) Feminist practice & poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Weigand, E.
    (2010) Dialogue: The mixed game. John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  73. Yeon, J., & Brown, L.
    (2019) Korean: A comprehensive grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315160351
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315160351 [Google Scholar]
  74. Yoon, K.-J.
    (2004) Not just words: Korean social models and the use of honorifics. Intercultural Pragmatics, (). 10.1515/iprg.2004.1.2.189
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2004.1.2.189 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25044.lee
Loading
Pragmatic flexibility in Australian learners’ Korean apology strategies
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25044.lee
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25044.lee
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.25044.lee
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: apology strategies ; pragmatic competence ; L2 Korean ; speech levels ; Korean honorifics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error