1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this paper we address the issue of the evaluation of feminist language planning in Australia. Through case studies of some self-identified linguistic reformers and non-sexist language users we present a ‘trajectory’ framework for the exploration of evaluation as part of the language planning cycle. We map the users’ trajectories of change through documenting their ‘first contact’ with gender bias in language ( their responses, practices and actions in relation to this ( and their perceived roles in bringing about, facilitating and spreading change ( This documentation reveals narratives of resistance and empowerment through engagement with change in the context of dominant discourses but sometimes also of powerlessness and oppression through rejection and opposition. The outcomes of this analysis suggest multiple and complex interpretations and iterations of feminist linguistic reform evidenced through the mapping of trajectories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.26.1.03win
2003-01-01
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbott, G.
    (1984) Unisex ‘they’. English Language Teaching Journal, 38, 45–8. doi: 10.1093/elt/38.1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/38.1.45 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, D. L.
    (1987) Names and titles: maiden name retention and the use of Ms.Women and Language, 10, 37.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baranowski, M.
    (2002) Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6 (3), 378–97. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00193
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00193 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, D.
    (1985) Feminism and linguistic theory. London: Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑17727‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17727-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1995) Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper, R. L.
    (1984) The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50, 5–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper. R. L.
    (1989) Language planning and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ehrlich, S. & King, R.
    (1992) Gender-based language reform and the social construction of meaning. Discourse and Society, 3 (2), 151–66. doi: 10.1177/0957926592003002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fasold, R.
    (1984) The sociolinguistics of society. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Frank, F. W.
    (1989) Language planning, language reform and language change : a review of guidelines for nonsexist usage. In F. W. Frank & P. Treichler (pp.105–36).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Frank, F. W. , Treichler, P.
    with contributions by Gershuny, H.L. , McConnell-Ginet, S. & Wolfe, S. (1989) Language, gender and professional writing. New York: MLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gastil, J.
    (1990) Generic pronouns and sexual politics: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 23, 629–43. doi: 10.1007/BF00289252
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289252 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hellinger, M.
    (1990) Kontrastive feministische Linguistik. [Contrastive feminist linguistics]. Ismaning: Hueber.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Henley, N.
    (1987) The new species that seeks a new language: on sexism in language and language change. In J. Penfield , (Ed.) Women and language in transition (pp.3–27). Albany: State University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmes, J.
    (2001) A corpus-based view of gender in New Zealand. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.) Gender across languages. Volume1 (pp.115–36). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.9.10hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.9.10hol [Google Scholar]
  16. Irigaray, L.
    (Ed.) (1987) Le sexe linguistique. Langages85 (entire volume).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (Ed.) (1990) Sexes et genres à travers les langages. [Sex and gender across languages]. Paris: Bernard Grasset.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kurzon, D.
    (1989) Sexist and nonsexist language in legal texts: the state of the art. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 80, 99–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyers, M.W.
    (1993) Forms of they with singular noun phrase antecedents: Evidence from current educated English usage. Word, 44, 181–92. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1993.11435898
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1993.11435898 [Google Scholar]
  20. Newman, M.
    (1992) Pronominal disagreements: The stubborn problem of singular epicene antecedents. Language in Society, 21, 447–75. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500015529
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015529 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1997) Epicene pronouns: The linguistics of a prescriptive problem. New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pauwels, A.
    (1987) Language in transition: a study of the title ‘Ms ‘ in contemporary Australian society. In A.Pauwels (Ed.) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society (pp.129–54). Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1989) Feminist language change in Australia: changes in generic pronoun use. Paper presented at theTagung der deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Osnabrück, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1996) Feminist language planning and titles for women: some crosslinguistic perspectives. In U. Ammon , & M. Hellinger (Eds.) Contrastive Sociolinguistics (pp.251–69). Berlin: Mouton-De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110811551.251
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811551.251 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1997) Of handymen and waitpersons: a linguistic evaluation of job classifieds. Australian Journal of Communication, 24 (1), 58–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (1998) Women changing language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2001a) Non-sexist language reform and generic pronouns in Australian English. English World-Wide, 22 (1), 105–19. doi: 10.1075/eww.22.1.06pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.22.1.06pau [Google Scholar]
  28. (2001b) Spreading the feminist word: The case of the new courtesy title Ms in Australian English. In M. Hellinger , & H. Bussmann , (Eds.) Gender across languages. International perpectives of language variation and change. Volume1. Amsterdam: Benjamins, (pp. 137–51). doi: 10.1075/impact.9.11pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.9.11pau [Google Scholar]
  29. (2002a) The sociolinguistics of generic pronouns: women and men’s use of gender-inclusive, gender-neutral and masculine generic pronouns. Paper presented at theInternational Sociological Association Congress, RC Sociolinguistics, Brisbane, July 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (2002b) Men Msbehaving? The role of men in the adoption and spread of a linguistic innovation. Paper presented at theSociolinguistics Symposium, University of Gent, Belgium, March 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Romaine, S.
    (2001) A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.) (pp.153–75). doi: 10.1075/impact.9.12rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.9.12rom [Google Scholar]
  32. Rubin, D. , Greene, K. & Schneider, D.
    (1994) Adopting gender-inclusive language reforms: Diachronic and synchronic variation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 91–114. doi: 10.1177/0261927X94132001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Stringer, J.L. & Hopper, R.
    (1998) Generic he in conversation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, 209–21. doi: 10.1080/00335639809384214
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639809384214 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.26.1.03win
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error