1887
Volume 26, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Since the early 1980s, SLA research has been exploring the contribution of negotiated interaction to second language learning. Attention has been and continues to be given to the conditions that are necessary for L2 acquisition, the relationship between negotiated interaction and language learning, and factors that may facilitate the process. This article reports on a study which investigated the extent to which two individual learner variables (ethnocultural pairing and gender) and certain types of task (free conversation and decision-making tasks) have an effect on negotiation opportunities provided for and by advanced Japanese and Korean male and female ESL learners. Data from 24 dyads found that neither of the individual learner variables affected the amount of negotiation that occurred but that free conversation generated a significantly higher amount of negotiation than decision-making tasks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.26.2.05bit
2003-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bitchener, J.
    (1999) The negotiation of meaning by advanced ESL learners: The effects of individual learner factors and task type. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Coughlan, P. & Duff, P.
    (1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Crookes, G. & Rulon, K.
    (1988) Topic and feedback in native speaker/non-native speaker conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 675–681. doi: 10.2307/3587274
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587274 [Google Scholar]
  4. Day, R. , Chenoweth, N. , Chun, A. & Luppescu, S.
    (1984) Corrective feedback in native-normative discourse. Language Learning, 34, 19–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1984.tb01002.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb01002.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Doughty, C. & Pica, T.
    (1986) Information gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition?TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Duff, P.
    (1986) Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp.147–181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis, R.
    (2000) Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4 (3), 193–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellis, R. & He, X.
    (1999) The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285–301. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199002077
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002077 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, R. , Tanaka, Y & Yamazaki, A.
    (1994) Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01114.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Foster, P.
    (1998) A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Foster, P. & Skehan, P.
    (1997) Modifying the task: The effects of surprise, time and planning type on task based foreign language instruction. Thames Valley Working Papers in English Language Teaching, 4, 19–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Freed, A. & Greenwood, A.
    (1996) Women, men, and type of talk: What makes the difference?Language in Society, 25, 1–26. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500020418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020418 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gass, S.
    (1997) Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gass, S. , & Varonis, E.
    (1986) Sex differences in NNS-NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.) Talking to learn: Conversations in second language acquisition (pp.327–351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gumperz, J.
    (1978) The conversational analysis of interethnic communication. In E. Lamar Ross (Ed.) Interethnic communication (pp.25–43). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lantolf, J. & Appel, G.
    (Eds.) (1994) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Long, M.
    (1983) Native speaker/normative speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition, Volume II: Second language acquisition (pp.413–468). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mackey, A.
    (1995) Stepping up the pace: Input, interaction and interlanguage development: An empirical study of questions in ESL. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1999) Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199004027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004027 [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakahama, Y. , Tyler, A. & Van Lier, L.
    (2001) Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 377–405. doi: 10.2307/3588028
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028 [Google Scholar]
  22. Okamoto, S.
    (1995) “Tasteless” Japanese. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.) Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp.297–325). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pica, T.
    (1991) Do second language learners need negotiation?Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 10, 1–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1992) The textual outcomes of native speaker-normative speaker negotiation: What do they reveal about language learning?In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.) Text in context: Cross disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp.198–237). Lexington, MA: Heath.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?Language Learning, 44, 493–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x [Google Scholar]
  26. (1996) The essential role of negotiation in the communicative classroom. JALT Journal, 18, 241–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pica, T. , Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J.
    (1993) Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.) Task-based learning in a second language (pp.9–34). London: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pica, T. , Holliday, L. , Lewis, N. , Berducci, D. & Newman, J.
    (1991) Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343–376. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100010020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010020 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pica, T. , Holliday, L. , Lewis, N. & Morgenthaler, L.
    (1989) Comprehensible out- put as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63–90. doi: 10.1017/S027226310000783X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000783X [Google Scholar]
  30. Pica, T. , Lincoln-Porter, F. , Paninos, D. & Linnell, J.
    (1996) Language learners interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59–84. doi: 10.2307/3587607
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587607 [Google Scholar]
  31. Plough, I. , & Gass, S.
    (1993) Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.) Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp.35–56). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Reynolds, K.
    (1990) Female speakers of Japanese in transition. In S. Ide & N. McGloin (Eds.) Aspects of Japanese women’s language (pp.129–146). Tokyo: Kuroshio.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, L.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sadow, S.
    (1982) Idea bank: Creative activities for the language class. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmidt, R.
    (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
  36. (1994) Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 206–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Scollon, R. , & Scollon, S.
    (1981) Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Song, K.
    (1993) An interactional sociolinguistic analysis of argument strategies in Korean conversational discourse: Negotiating disagreement and conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sparenta, L.
    (Ed.) (1980) Towards the creative teaching of English. London: George, Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Varonis, E. & Gass, S.
    (1985) Nonnative/nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71–90. doi: 10.1093/applin/6.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.1.71 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.26.2.05bit
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error