1887
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Measures of lexical richness aim at quantifying the degree to which L2 writers are using a varied and large vocabulary. One method for calculating lexical richness is the Lexical Frequency Profile, or LFP (Laufer & Nation, 1995). The LFP, calculated by a computer programme, provides a detailed picture of vocabulary use measured against several frequency lists of words. This paper reports on a small-scale study to investigate the effectiveness of calculating the LFP of written texts of German. This study formed part of a larger study to investigate the impact of dictionaries on students’ writing. Six subjects completed two timed writing tasks in examination conditions, one with and one without a bilingual dictionary. It was envisaged that the LFP might be helpful in determining if the presence of the bilingual dictionary made a difference to students’ lexical sophistication. A calculation of the LFP was carried out using two context-specific lists. Figures were calculated for the number of word tokens and word families. It was concluded that, although using the computer programme with German texts presented some difficulties not present when using the software with English frequency lists, the LFP showed itself to be a valuable diagnostic tool that was able to differentiate between proficiency levels in German and to provide useful information about lexical richness in German texts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.27.1.03eas
2004-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauer, L. , & Nation, P.
    (1993) Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253-279. doi: 10.1093/ijl/6.4.253
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/6.4.253 [Google Scholar]
  2. Coxhead, A.
    (1998) The development and evaluation of an academic word list. Unpublished MA thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
  3. (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. doi: 10.2307/3587951
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951 [Google Scholar]
  4. Heatley, A. , Nation, P. , & Coxhead, A.
    (2002) RANGE and FREQUENCY Programs. RetrievedJanuary 6, 2003, fromwww.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/Paul_Nation
  5. Heller, K.
    (2000) Rechtschreibung 2000 – die aktuelle Reform: Wörterliste der geänderten Schreibungen. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Laufer, B. , & Nation, P.
    (1995) Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.3.307
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307 [Google Scholar]
  7. Nation, P.
    (2002) Range and Frequency: Programs for Windows based PCs. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. NZQA.
    NZQA. (2000) School Certificate German (Second Language) 027. RetrievedJanuary 9, 2003, fromwww.nzqa.govt.nz/services/regulations/2001/pdfs/school_certificate/germ_027.pqf
  9. NZQA.
    NZQA. (2003) University Entrance, Bursaries and Scholarships German (Second Language) 227. RetrievedJanuary 17, 2003, fromwww.nzqa.govt.nz/services/regulations/2003/pdfs/ue_bursary_schoolarshipZgerm_227.pdf
  10. Oxford University Language Centre
    Oxford University Language Centre (2003) Online tests. RetrievedFebruary 3, 2003, fromwww.lang.ox.ac.uk/placement.html
  11. Terrell, P. , Schnorr, V. , Morris, W. V. A. , & Breitsprecher, R.
    (Eds.) (1997) The Collins German Dictionary – unabridged (Third ed.). Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Universität Leipzig
    Universität Leipzig (2001) Projekt Deutscher Wortschatz: Wortschatz-Lexikon – Wortlisten. RetrievedFebruary 3, 2003, fromwortschatz.uni-leipzig.de/
  13. West, M.
    (1953) A general service list of English words. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.27.1.03eas
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error