1887
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

English interlanguage interrogative structures examined with regard to two implicational universals were found to be supportive of predictive validity of the universals (Eckman, Moravcsik & Wirth, 1989). This study further tests the extent to which the two universals could hold for English interlanguage in a different setting. The two implicational universals at issue were formulated by Greenberg (1963) who claimed that subject-verb inversion occurs in questions only if it also occurs in questions, and that subject-verb inversion in -questions occurs only if wh-words/phrases are fronted. Unlike Eckman et al’s study, the present study used interview and role-play tasks to collect data from fifty-two ESL learners at the Monash University English Language Centre; however, findings of this study are comparable to those of Eckman et al (1989) in that they also strongly support the observed universals. A tentative explanation in terms of fossilisation, though, seems to account more appropriately for the exception in this study.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.27.1.07zha
2004-01-01
2018-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brines, V.
    (1990) Learning yes-no questions under different academic conditions. IRAL, 28 (3), 234-247.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Comrie, B.
    (1981) Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Eckman, F.
    (1977) Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27 (2), 315-330. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Eckman, F. , Moravcsik, E. & Wirth, J.
    (1989) Implicational universals and interrogative structures in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Language Learning, 39 (2), 173-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1989.tb00421.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00421.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Gass, S.
    (1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29 (2), 327-344. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1979.tb01073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01073.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenberg, J.
    (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.) Universals of language (pp.73-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hawkins, J. A.
    (1987) Implicational universals as predictors of language acquisition. Linguistics, 25 (3), 453-473. doi: 10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.453
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.453 [Google Scholar]
  8. (1990) Seeking motives for change in typological variation. In W. Croft , K. Denning and S. Kemmer (Eds.) Studies in typology and diachrony: papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th birthday (pp.95-128). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.20.08haw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.20.08haw [Google Scholar]
  9. (1999) Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75 (2), 244-285. doi: 10.2307/417261
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417261 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hsia, S.
    (1986) The role of L1 influence on the learning of a target language in a non target language environment. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics, 74, 63-105.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyltenstam, K.
    (1984) The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: the case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. Andersen (Ed.) Second languages: a cross-linguistic perspective (pp.39-58). Rowley, Mass: Newbury House Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson, H.
    (1992) Defossilizing. English Language Teaching Journal, 46 (2), 180-189. doi: 10.1093/elt/46.2.180
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.2.180 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, S.
    (1999) The subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of WH-questions by Korean learners of English. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 3, 1-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Krashen, S.
    (1977) Some issues relating to the monitor model. In H. D. Brown , C. A. Yorio and R. H. Crymes (Eds.) Teaching and learning English as a second language: trends in research and practice, on TESOL ‘77 (pp.144-158). Washington D. C.: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1980) The input hypothesis. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.) Current issues in bilingual education (pp.168-180). Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mukattash, L.
    (1981) Wh-questions in English: a problem for Arab students. IRAL, 19 (4), 317-332.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saunders, N. J.
    (1983) “Will you get off this plane somewhere?“ Form and function in the L2 acquisition of English by adult Japanese. Occasional Papers Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, 6, 66-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Seliger, H. W. & Shohamy, E.
    (1989) Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Selinker, L. & Lakshamanan, U.
    (1992) Language Transfer and fossilization: the multiple effects principle. In S. M Gass and L. Selinker (Eds.) Language transfer in language learning (pp.197-216). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/lald.5.13sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.5.13sel [Google Scholar]
  20. Tarone, E.
    (1983) On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 142-164. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.142
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.142 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1985) Variability in interlanguage use: a study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35, 373-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1985.tb01083.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01083.x [Google Scholar]
  22. (1988) Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, W.
    (2000) Fossilization in interlanguage and oral language teaching. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 9 (137), 33-35.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.27.1.07zha
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error