1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 3, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Questions used in reading comprehension tests have been discussed in terms of the forms they take, the kind of overt response required, and the level of comprehension they evoke. But very little has been said about the kinds of textual functions such questions involve. This paper explores the kinds of textual relations that must be understood in order to respond to various questions.

An understanding of what textual relations must be comprehended has ramifications for both the measurement of reading ability and of readability. The study of readability is concerned with the question: What makes one text more difficult to read (comprehend) than another? Traditionally the assessment of readability level has been based on formal linguistic factors. However, much of the information required for comprehending a written text is not encoded explicitly but is left implicit. It is suggested that implicitness may be a source of reading ease or difficulty.

© 1980 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
1980-01-01
2024-09-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Clymer, T. C.
    “What is Reading? Some Current Concepts”, in Robinson, H. M. (Ed.) Innovation and Change in Reading Instruction, 67th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Elley, Warwick , B.
    1975 Assessing the difficulty of Reading Materials: The Noun Frequency Method. Wellington. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldsweig, B.
    (Assoc. Ed.) “The Lumpy Nose”, inSprint, Scope/Skills Book. New York: Scholastic Book Services 1970.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1977 “Text as Semantic Choice in Social Contexts”. In Dijk, T. van , and Petofi, J. S. , (Eds), Grammar and Descriptions, Berlin: W. de Gruyter, RTTI.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Halliday, M. A. K. , and Hasan, R.
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Lorge, I.
    1949 “Reading and readability”. Teacher’s College Record, 51.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. McCall, W. A. , and Crabbs, L. M.
    1961 Standard Test Lessons in Reading. New York: Teachers’ College Press, Teachers’ College, Columbia University.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Progressive Achievement Tests: Reading Comprehension, Form A, Australian Council for Educational Research (in cooperation with the NZCER),Frederick Street, Hawthorn: Victoria 1973.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.3.2.07ger
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error