Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


In recent years, research with both first and second language students has suggested that the standard nth word cloze -procedure could be improved as a measure of reading comprehension through the introduction of multiple-choice or matching cloze formats. In addition, research conducted mainly with first language students, has suggested that the every nth word deletion procedure should be restricted so as to delete only the lexical words in the passage. In this study, three different deletion systems, presented in a matching cloze format, were evaluated as measures of reading comprehension for seventh grade ESL students from Papua New Guinea. The possible interaction of the three deletion types with these students’ vernacular background was also investigated.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aitken, Kenneth G.
    1975 “Problems in cloze testing re-examined: A reply to Roger K. Williams.” TESL Reporter, 8, 9, 16–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1977 “Using cloze procedure as an overall language proficiency test.” TESOL Quarterly, 11, 59–67. doi: 10.2307/3585592
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3585592 [Google Scholar]
  3. 1978 “Constructing a multiple choice test of E.S.L..” RELC Journal, 9, 105–108. doi: 10.1177/003368827800900208
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827800900208 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, Jonathan
    1976Psycholinguistic Experiments in Foreign Language Testing. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Ivan K. Propst, Jr.
    1978 “Preliminary evidence regarding the validity of a modified cloze procedure for lower elementary ESL students.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 451–455. doi: 10.1177/001316447803800229
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800229 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Robert Morley
    1979 “Matching cloze as an evaluation procedure of slow learning children.” The Exceptional Child, 26, 23–26. doi: 10.1080/0156655790260103
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655790260103 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Ivan K. Propst, Jr.
    In Press. “Matching and multiple-choice cloze tests.” Journal of Educational Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. , Robert L.T. Dawson , John Prior , Ivan K. Propst, Jr.
    In Press. “Can matching cloze be used with secondary ESL pupils?” Journal of Reading.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blachowicz, Canille L.Z.
    1977 “Cloze activities for primary readers.” The Reading Teacher. 31, 300–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bormuth, John T.
    1970On the Theory of Achievement Test Items. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowers, Frederick and Phil L. Nacke
    1971-72 “Cloze, transformational theory and redundancy.” Journal of Reading Behaviour, 4, 20–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyce, Max W.
    1974 “The cloze procedure – Some methodological considerations.” Probe, 3, 17–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, Milton L. and Barbara Johnson
    1973 “Cloze procedures in measuring comprehension: Simple or complex.” Q.I.E.R. Journal, 2, 13–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Common Core Course for English. n.d. Port Moresby: Department of Education, 20, 17; 20, 18; 23, 1; 23, 45.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Connor, Ulla and Charles Read
    1978 “Passage dependency in ESL reading comprehension tests.” Language Learning, 28, 149–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1978.tb00311.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00311.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Darnell, Donald K.
    1968The Development of an English Language Proficiency Test of Foreign Students Using a Clozentropy Procedure, Final Report. Dept. of Speech and Drama, Colorado University Boulder, ERIC ED 024 039.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ebel, R. L.
    1961 “Must all tests be valid?” American Psychologist, 16, 640–647. doi: 10.1037/h0045478
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045478 [Google Scholar]
  18. Farr, R.
    1969Reading: What can be measured?Newark, Del: International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferguson, G. A.
    1976Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education (4th). New York: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Greene, Frank P.
    1965 “Modification of the cloze procedure and changes in reading test performance.” Journal of Education Measurement, 2, 213–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑3984.1965.tb00418.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1965.tb00418.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Heitzman, Andrew J. and Richard H. Bloomer
    1967 “The effect of non-overt reiforced cloze procedure upon reading comprehension.” Journal of Reading, 11, 213–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jongsma, Eugene
    1971The Cloze Procedure as a Teaching Technique. Newark, De.: International Reading Association, 40p.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jonz, Jon.
    1976 “Improving on the basic egg: The M-C cloze.” Language Learning, 26, 255–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1976.tb00276.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00276.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Klingbergs, Ed and Dan Doorn
    1977Marianas Test of English Achievement Reading Comprehension (Form B), Saipan: Department of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Louthan, Vincent
    1965 “Some systematic grammatical deletions and their effects on reading comprehension.” English Journal, 54, 294–299. doi: 10.2307/811113
    https://doi.org/10.2307/811113 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nystrand, Martin
    1976 “Ontological Aspects of Validity Concerns in Language Arts Assessment.” Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 32p. ERIC ED, 133 733.
  27. Ohnmacht, Fred W. , Wendell W. Weaver and Emmett T. Kohler
    1970 “Cloze and closure: a factorial study.” Journal of Psychology, 74, 205–217. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1970.9923731
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1970.9923731 [Google Scholar]
  28. Oiler, John W., Jr.
    1972 “Scoring methods and difficulty levels for cloze tests of proficiency in English as a second language.” Modern Language Journal, 56, 151–158. doi: 10.2307/324037
    https://doi.org/10.2307/324037 [Google Scholar]
  29. 1973 “Cloze tests of second language proficiency and what they measure.” Language Learning, 23, 104–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1976 “Language testing today: An interview with John Oiler.” English Teaching Forum, XIV, 22–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. O’Reilly, Robert P. and R. T. Schuder
    1977 “Some Issues in the Measurement of Basic Competence in Reading.” Paper presented at61st Annual AERA Meeting, New York, 51p. ERIC ED 148 897.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. O’Reilly, Robert P. and Ronald E. Streeter
    1977 “Report on the development and validation of a system for measuring literal comprehension in a multiple-choice cloze format: Preliminary analytic results.” Journal of Reading Behaviour, 9, 45–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ozete, Oscar
    1977 “The cloze procedure: A Modification.” Foreign Language Annals, 10, 565, 568. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1977.tb03033.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1977.tb03033.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Porter, D.
    1956 “Modified cloze procedure: A more valid reading comprehension test.” English Language Teaching Journal, 30, 151–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Propst, Ivan K., Jr. and Richard B. Baldauf, Jr.
    1979 “Use matching cloze tests for elementary ESL students.” The Reading Teacher, 32, 683–690.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rankin, Earl F.
    1958 “An evaluation of the cloze procedure as a technique for measuring reading comprehension.” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan 1957) Dissertation Abstracts, 19, 733–734.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schneyer, J. Wesley
    1965 “Use of the cloze procedure for improving reading comprehension.” The Reading Teacher, 19, 174–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shaw, John Robert and Janet Shaw
    1969The New Horizon Ladder Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Signet Bopks.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, Wilson L.
    1956 “Recent developments in the use of ‘cloze procedure’.” Journalism Quarterly, 33, 42–46, 99. doi: 10.1177/107769905603300106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905603300106 [Google Scholar]
  40. 1957 “‘Cloze’ readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and attitude.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 19–26. doi: 10.1037/h0040591
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040591 [Google Scholar]
  41. Thorndike, Robert L. and Elizabeth Hagan
    1969Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Trust Territory Government
    Trust Territory Government 1979Micronesian Achievement Test Series (MATS), Reading, Level I-III, Form A. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tuinman, J. Jaap and Gordon Gray
    1972 “The effect of reducing the redundancy of written messages by deletion of function words.” Journal of Psychology, 82, 299–306. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1972.9923820
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1972.9923820 [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams, Roger K.
    1974 “Problems in cloze testing.” TESL Reporter, 7, 7–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wurm, S. A.
    1970 “Indigenous languages.” In R. G. Ward and D. A. M. Lea , An Atlas of Papua and New Guinea. Glasgow: Collins Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error