1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

Research article introductions (RAIs) play a significant role in gaining publication, and therefore have been studied by many applied linguists. Research into RAIs published in Indonesia has begun to be developed (Adnan, 2009; Mirahayuni, 2001; Safnil, 2000), and generally conclude that Indonesian Humanities RAIs were structured differently from English RAIs. However, as these are early studies, their findings still awaits scrutiny, and little information on Indonesian RAIs especially in Education has been published. Several models describing discourse structure of research article introductions have been proposed, but they have been problematic when applied to analyse RAIs. This paper reports an examination of the applicability of two important models, the CARS (Swales, 1990) and the PJP model claimed to be an Indonesian model of Humanities RAIs (Safnil, 2000), using a selection of 21 Indonesian research article Introductions (RAIs) written by Indonesian academics in Education. It concentrates on the following questions: To what extent do these models fit the data and why? The examination found that none of the RAIs fit the CARS, and only less than half fit the PJP model for various reasons. Therefore a new model is proposed. This model fits most of the data. The paper claims that apart from national concerns, discourse patterns of RAIs are also affected by writing guides provided by the discipline.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.34.1.05adn
2011-01-01
2019-11-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adnan, Z.
    (2009) Some potential problems for research articles written by Indonesian academics when submitted to international English language Journals. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(1), 107–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad, U. K.
    (1997) Research article introductions in Malay: rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp.273–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110821048.273
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048.273 [Google Scholar]
  3. Australian Research Council
    Australian Research Council (2009) Linkage projects funding rules. RetrievedMarch 8, 2009fromwww.arc.gov.au/ncgp/lp/lp_fundingrules.htm.
  4. Connor, U. & Mauranen, A.
    (1999) Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47–62. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(97)00026‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00026-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Creswell, J.
    (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Golebiowski, Z.
    (1999) Application of Swales’ model in the analysis of research papers by Polish authors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 231–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gunnarsson, B.-L. , Linell, P. & Nordberg, B.
    (Eds) (1994) Text and talk in professional contexts. Selected papers from the international conference “Discourse and the Professions”, Uppsala, 26–29 August, 1992. Uppsala: ASLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoey, M.
    (1983) On the surface of discourse. London/Sydney: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mas’oed, M.
    (1983) The economic and political structure during the Early New Order, 1966–71. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mirahayuni, N. K.
    (2001) Investigating textual structure in native and non-native English research articles: strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Najjar, H. Y.
    (1990) Arabic as a Research Language: The Case Study of the Agricultural Sciences. University of Michigan, Ann Arbour.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nwogu, K. N.
    (1997) The medical research paper: structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119–138. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(97)85388‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4 [Google Scholar]
  13. Richards, J. & Schmidt, R.
    (2002) Longman dictionary of teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rifai, M.
    (1995) Pegangan Gaya Penulisan, Penyumtingan dan Penerbitan Karya Ilmiah Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Safnil
    (2000) Rhetorical structure analysis of the Indonesian research articles. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Samraj, B.
    (2002) Introductions in research articles: variations across the disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00023‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Soemardjan, S.
    (Ed.) (1994) Culture, development, and democracy: a tribute to Soedjatmoko. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Swales, J.
    (1981) Aspects of research article introductions. Birmingham, UK: Ashton University, the Languages Studies Unit.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2004) Research genres: exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  21. Winter, E.
    (1971) A clause-relational approach to English texts: a study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science, 6(1), 1–91. doi: 10.1007/BF00125597
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125597 [Google Scholar]
  22. Zappen, J.
    (1985) Writing the introduction to a research paper: an assessment of alternatives. The Technical Writing Teacher, 12, 93–101.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.34.1.05adn
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error