1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 34, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 34, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
PDF

Abstract

This study aims to identify the relationship between the developmental hierarchy in the acquisition of Arabic as a second language (Arabic L2) and formal classroom instruction. It provides a general presentation of the current debate on the influence of formal instruction in the acquisition of L2. Special attention is given to the subset of Processability Theory (PT) known as Teachability Theory, and its implications for teaching methods of L2 in general and Arabic L2 in particular. This study also provides descriptive information on teaching objectives and materials used by the participants to study Arabic L2. This information is presented in order to establish an explanation for the connection between the formal teaching of Arabic L2 and the processability hierarchy. Participants were nine students studying Arabic as a second language at the Australian National University (three Beginners, three Intermediates, and three Advanced). Interviews were conducted over a period of two teaching semesters during the year 2005. Both implicational and distributional analyses were conducted. The results of these analyses show that teachers and curriculum developers should consider the PT’s predicted developmental stages for Arabic L2 structures when developing teaching materials and syllabus.

© 2011 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.34.2.01als
2011-01-01
2024-10-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.34.2.01als
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Shatter, G.
    (2007) Implementation and evaluation of new learning approach in Arabic: Implications for translator training. Translation Watch Quarterly, 3 (1), 94–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. (2008) The development of verbal structures in L2 Arabic. In J.-U. Kessler , (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language sevelopment and second language learning (pp.267–299). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Pub.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. (2010) Acquisition and development of nominal and verbal structures in Arabic: Agreement morphology in second language acquisition. Saarbrücken: VDM, Verlag Dr. Müller.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook, M.
    (2006) The multidimentional model, processability pheory and the peachability/learnability hypothesis: Suggestions for the Japanese context. Journal of the Faculty of Global Communication, Siebold University of Negasaki, 7, 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Dekeyser, R.
    (2003) Implicit and explicit learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Biase, B.
    (Ed.) (2002a) Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish. Melbourne: Language Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. (2002b) Focusing strategies in second language development: A classroom-based study of Italian L2 in primary school. In B. Di Biase , (Ed.), Developing a second Language: acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (pp.95–120). Melbourne: Language Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S.
    (2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of processability theory: language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18 (3), 272–300. doi: 10.1191/0267658302sr204oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr204oa [Google Scholar]
  9. Doughty, C. J.
    (2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, R.
    (1990) Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. (1999) Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.17
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.17 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L.
    (1994) Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdal, New Jersey Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Håkansson, G.
    (2002) Learning and teaching of Swedish: a Processability perspective. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (Vol. 10) (pp.7–16). Melbourne: Language Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kawaguchi, S.
    (2002) Grammatical development in learning of Japanese as a second language. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (Vol. 10) (pp.17–29). Melbourne: Language Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (2005) Argument structure and syntactic development in Japanese as a second language. In M. Pienemann , (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp.253–298). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.10kaw
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.10kaw [Google Scholar]
  16. Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H.
    (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London; New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lenzing, A.
    (2008) Teachability and learnability: An analysis of primary school textbooks. In J. KeBler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp.221–241). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Long, M. H.
    (1988) Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe , (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp.115–141). New York: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M.
    (2004) Input versus transfer? - the role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of L2 preposition. In M. Achardand & S. Niemeier , (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.77–93). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199857.77
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.77 [Google Scholar]
  20. Macaro, E.
    (2003) Teaching and learning a second language: A review of recent research. London; New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Mansouri, F.
    (1997) From emergence to acquisition: Developmental issues in agreement marking among Australian learners of Arabic. The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 83–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (1999a) Interlanguage syntax in Arabic as a second language: A processability theory perspective. Languages and Linguistics, 4, 45–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (1999b) The acquisition of Arabic as a second language: From theory to practice. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. (2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp.117–154). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.06man
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.06man [Google Scholar]
  25. (Ed.) (2007) Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mansouri, F. & Håkansson, G.
    (2007) Intra-stage developmental order: Empirical evidence from Arabic and Swedish as second languages. In F. Mansouri , (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp.95–118). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Matthews, S. & Yip, V.
    (2003) Relative clauses in early bilingual development: Transfer and universals. In A. Giacalone Ramat , (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp.39–81). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. McLaughlin, B.
    (1987) Theories of second language learning. London; New York: Arnold, Edward.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. (1990) “Conscious” versus “unconscious” learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24 (4), 617–634. doi: 10.2307/3587111
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587111 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nielsen, H. L.
    (1997) On acquisition order of agreement procedures in Arabic learner language. Al-Arabiyya, 30, 49–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Odlin, T.
    (2003) Cross-linguistic influence. Malden: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch15
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pienemann, M.
    (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 52–79. doi: 10.1093/applin/10.1.52
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.15
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2005a) An introduction to processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp.ix–60). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.03pie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.03pie [Google Scholar]
  35. (Ed.) (2005b) Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rivers, W. M.
    (1991) Psychological validation of methodological approaches and foreign language classroom practices. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp.283–294). Lexington; Massachusetts; Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ur, P.
    (1996) A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, Y.
    (2005) Processing and formal Instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp.155–177). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.30.07zha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.07zha [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.34.2.01als
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Applied Linguistics; Arabic L2; Curriculum Design; Language Development; Teaching Methods

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error